OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,607
TN, taking those goddamned military style weapons out of civilian hands is not taking away anyone's rights to be armed. Those are inappropriate for civilian use and they are misused in a spectacular way by nutcases that our country won't take steps to keep unarmed. Whatever geniuses at Colt decided to design and sell those AR's ought to burn in hell and I hope they are.Then you fell off your family tree because you justify GIVING rights away.? Really? I moved here first and I bet my people were broker and more anarchistic than your people by a long shot.I forgot i cant talk to you about this because you are so dishonest about it.Oh relax, Oregonians can still blast the shit out of each other with shotguns.Military personnel, law enforcement and members of the government could be exempt from the ban.
Well, thats good.. the elite and the guys that wont protect you will still be able to protect themselves. amirite OldLady or what?
Yell yippy for stripping away the peons rights!!
You NEVER comment on the point. Just justify throwing away rights.
You make me sick. We moved from europe to get away from people like you.
LOL
My folks "elites." That's a good one.
EXCUSE me for skipping a retarded point raised by a guy who's getting his spittle all over my computer screen. Just stop it, TN.
The politicians will still have armed guards but we cant? Leave the protection to the police who dont have to protect you? The same cowards that stood idle while some crazy kid shot up a school? And that doesnt bother you a bit?
Holy fucking shit OL. Im sorry, but i just cant understand that level of ignorance and cowardice. I just cant.
I can understand your argument and I hear where you are coming from. I sometimes think about it fairly seriously. You can call me whatever names you want, but I can't for the life of me see how that ban would violate your rights or keep you from protecting yourself and your family.