Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has as I have said before to others continue to deny it if it makes you happy it won't change anything . Oh and what it also won't do is give NBC a justification to bring Brian Williams back from the six month suspension which I suspect is part of the reason behind this given the far left did not start pushing this till after the Williams suspension.He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Not in liberal land.He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?
He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?
Not in liberal land.He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?
He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
O"Reilly has invited his accuser any of them to come on his show and back up their claims all have refused I suspect the far lefties are good with that.
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?
How can someone prove where Bill O was without Bill O telling anyone? Should they hire a detective to dig through records? Ooooorrrr, yanno, ask the person themselves?
Bill O Reilly Responds. We Annotate. Mother Jones
Rather than answer directly to the accuser, O'Reilly takes his defense to the air on his FOX. Conveniently, no one could ask him additional questions. Conveniently, no one could cross examine his portrayal of his "war zone" statements.
O'Reilly knows where he is safe. And FOX is craning their necks looking the other way. AMAZING! The other journalist who covered the riots in Argentina are angry that O'Reilly portrayed them as cowering in their room. But he will get away with his lies and fabrications, because FOX...with the blessings of the Australian, will swear he has been soiled by a politically motivated hack job.
ANSWER MOTHER JONES, BILL! QUIT HIDING BEHIND FOX AND YOUR LOW INFORMATION AUDIENCE.
he's earned that right. He's a brilliant man that can't be debated, and has an honorable history and should be commended for his hard work and bravery. Everybody else needs to burn in hell.
He's provided documentation. All the left has is David Korn's mouth and imagination.
And eight witnesses that say Bill is lying.
the fact that pooper troll clicked on alike for this post is proof I am right.hee heeAre you posting from a mental institute? You believe Bill is taking his orders from the CIA?Bill O Reilly Responds. We Annotate. Mother Jones
Rather than answer directly to the accuser, O'Reilly takes his defense to the air on his FOX. Conveniently, no one could ask him additional questions. Conveniently, no one could cross examine his portrayal of his "war zone" statements.
O'Reilly knows where he is safe. And FOX is craning their necks looking the other way. AMAZING! The other journalist who covered the riots in Argentina are angry that O'Reilly portrayed them as cowering in their room. But he will get away with his lies and fabrications, because FOX...with the blessings of the Australian, will swear he has been soiled by a politically motivated hack job.
ANSWER MOTHER JONES, BILL! QUIT HIDING BEHIND FOX AND YOUR LOW INFORMATION AUDIENCE.
plant O'reily is doing what his handlers at the CIA have instructed him to do.evade,lie and insult which is the norm for him.
Dear GOD!
I'll hang around for some more of your posts so I can forward them to the planet Uranus where YOUR handlers will NOT be happy you have 'outed' Bill. That was a VERY stupid thing for you to do.
Now you will have your secret 'Moonbeam' powder reduced as punishment!
But if you don't smarten up I will instruct the boys on Uranus to 'vanish' you. When you wake up you'll be Al Sharpton's bikini thong!
Bill O Reilly Responds. We Annotate. Mother Jones
Rather than answer directly to the accuser, O'Reilly takes his defense to the air on his FOX. Conveniently, no one could ask him additional questions. Conveniently, no one could cross examine his portrayal of his "war zone" statements.
O'Reilly knows where he is safe. And FOX is craning their necks looking the other way. AMAZING! The other journalist who covered the riots in Argentina are angry that O'Reilly portrayed them as cowering in their room. But he will get away with his lies and fabrications, because FOX...with the blessings of the Australian, will swear he has been soiled by a politically motivated hack job.
ANSWER MOTHER JONES, BILL! QUIT HIDING BEHIND FOX AND YOUR LOW INFORMATION AUDIENCE.
he's earned that right. He's a brilliant man that can't be debated, and has an honorable history and should be commended for his hard work and bravery. Everybody else needs to burn in hell.
He's provided documentation. All the left has is David Korn's mouth and imagination.
And eight witnesses that say Bill is lying.
Oh good, what do you want done? Suspended? Banned? Electric Chair? What do you want?
Yes, but they did not destroy 7 hard drives "accidentally" and did not take the 5th fifty times in front of congressional hearing like Lois Lerner and IRS. I bet that O'Reilly matter has you liberals even more incensed about the gravity of that falklands scandal.
That is one of the dumber responses of the night only in the liberal mind do you accuse someone of something then demand they prove you wrong.Not in liberal land.He has backed up his claims he's going to again tonight last I checked the burden of proof was on the accuser. So far they have provided none as far as edits go that's the MO of the gang at MSNBC.Sure, sure..thats the story
He's the one that needs to back up the claims lol. He wants to invite them on his show...I BET...so he can control the mics and edits
If he was there he can prove it...you cant prove a negative.
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser?
Liberal Land as in police? Because they usually ask for an Alibi. And that information is then checked.
Your bad
He's provided documentation. All the left has is David Korn's mouth and imagination.
And eight witnesses that say Bill is lying.
Oh good, what do you want done? Suspended? Banned? Electric Chair? What do you want?
He needs to put on his big boy pants and admit he lied. FOX can do whatever they will with him, which knowing FOX, would be a big promotion.
Typical liberal play. Find one sin on the right and you think you just won the war.Yes, but they did not destroy 7 hard drives "accidentally" and did not take the 5th fifty times in front of congressional hearing like Lois Lerner and IRS. I bet that O'Reilly matter has you liberals even more incensed about the gravity of that falklands scandal.
Typical repub play....."let's change the subject!"
He's provided documentation. All the left has is David Korn's mouth and imagination.
And eight witnesses that say Bill is lying.
Oh good, what do you want done? Suspended? Banned? Electric Chair? What do you want?
He needs to put on his big boy pants and admit he lied. FOX can do whatever they will with him, which knowing FOX, would be a big promotion.
