DaGoose
Gold Member
- Nov 16, 2010
- 4,347
- 666
Telling yourself that it was about the blow job allows you to howl hypocrisy.The Cons can say what they want but yes, it was about the blowjob. And now they want to turn a blind eye to Newt's philandering and desire for an open marriage?
Pure hypocrisy.
Yeah, its a classic libtard dodge, isnt it?
Make up what you think your opponents *really* mean and then slam them for it.
Facing the truth of the matter, that he treated women like dirt and that if a woman had the courage to say no to him she had better shop the resume is beyond you.
We critisize Clinton for being a philanderer who used his power to get sex and the libtards just assume that we really dont have a problem with that but it *must* be something else.
Wonder why that is?
But we still face the question of what is more important to us as citizens. Voting for incompetent and uxorious like Carter and Obama, or voting for comptent slime like Clinton and Gringrich.
The fact is that some of the best leaders throughout history have been philandering drunkards.
When you need a leader, you can be forgiven for over-looking a few things.
Rape isnt one of them.
Ok.....now we're back to the blowjob again. I wish you bastards would make up your mind.