Outrage grows after South Carolina officer throws student in classroom

[PaintMyHouse]

It's called Excessive Use of Force, AKA, Police Brutality:


"Excessive force. The frequency of police use-of-force events that may be defined as justified or excessive is difficult to estimate [2]. There is no national database of officer-involved shootings or incidents in which police use excessive force. Most agencies keep such records, but no mechanism exists to produce a national estimate.

A Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) analysis of national data on citizen complaints about use of force found that in large departments (those with 100 or more sworn officers), the complaint rate for police use of force was 6.6 complaints per 100 sworn officers. Of these complaints, 8 percent had sufficient evidence to take disciplinary action against the officer [3]. NIJ is currently funding a study of the validity and reliability of the BJS data. Read an abstract and see award details"

Police Use of Force | National Institute of Justice

None of that was alleged and he certainly isn't facing any charges for it. Sounds like the sack is empty.

Dummy, that's what he was fired for, and that and racism are what the potential Civil Rights violation are based on.

There wasn't enough evidence to charge him, what he did wrong was never specified, all of this is great fodder for the upcoming lawsuit. They should charge him with a crime just for liability sake, but when they lose in his criminal trial, it will boost his civil lawsuit all the more, so they won't.

They don't have to charge with a damn thing in order to fire him and be fully within their rights for his use of excessive force.

They won't charge him because there's no evidence of a crime.

Proof is in the pudding, pop.

There doesn't have to be a crime, dumbass. Excessive Use of Force is a cause for termination, just one of many, most of which are not crimes.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The Leftists here think that a desk can be moved even if the occupant pushes their feet down. They're not known for intelligence, that's for sure.

But there is no weight on your feet if you're sitting professor. You could also lean her back so her feet are off the floor.
You fools are taking this argument to pretty retarded lenghths.

Not retarded at all. You can put enough weight on your feet to destroy any mobility in moving that desk. She would have EVENTUALLY been pulled out of it and onto the floor.

Don't know HOW LONG you folks would allow this drama to go on with no response from the student. There's another confrontation every hour to resolve. And ONE cop. Only thing dragging her out into the hallway would have done ---- is DESTROYED THE VIDEO RECORD OF WHAT HAPPENED..

Talk about not thinking clearly...

OMG! You could also carry the entire desk.
Lean her back one guy grabs the chair legs while the other has the back. This doesn't need to be a criminal issue. She didn't rob a freak'n bank. Most kids act out because they have an issue. Putting charges on her does nothing to resolve that issue.
And yes it is retarded to continue arguing about this in this detail.

Really? Is that the police procedure? And what if she starts rocking side to side violently and falls over and injures herself. You twats have yet to actually think any of these "solutions" through.

We know for you, there is only one solution when an officer deals with a 14 yr old black girl.

Had to take that next step down the retard trail huh.

She's 18. Apparently you fucks have been lying about that this whole time.

 

[Hancock]

She was 18 years old. Or in legal terms, an adult. Yeah that changes the narrative a little, doesn't it?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[Tank]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

None of that was alleged and he certainly isn't facing any charges for it. Sounds like the sack is empty.

Dummy, that's what he was fired for, and that and racism are what the potential Civil Rights violation are based on.

There wasn't enough evidence to charge him, what he did wrong was never specified, all of this is great fodder for the upcoming lawsuit. They should charge him with a crime just for liability sake, but when they lose in his criminal trial, it will boost his civil lawsuit all the more, so they won't.

They don't have to charge with a damn thing in order to fire him and be fully within their rights for his use of excessive force.

They won't charge him because there's no evidence of a crime.

Proof is in the pudding, pop.

There doesn't have to be a crime, dumbass. Excessive Use of Force is a cause for termination, just one of many, most of which are not crimes.

Excessive use of force is assault. He isn't being charged with assault because it didn't happen. Hard to disprove that.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

Planning for that big Race War eh? Well, you're in good company here, at Stormfront-lite.

 

[Asclepias]

The Leftists here think that a desk can be moved even if the occupant pushes their feet down. They're not known for intelligence, that's for sure.

The cons here think a teenage girl is stronger than a full grown man. They are known for their fear and obedience to anyone they are told to obey.

And then there is the liberal guy who thinks disrupting a class full of students is acceptable. Oh well, I believe in education you believe in violence bubba.

I have seen this idea repeatedly on here.
I don't usually speak for everyone but I haven't seen anyone make that case except those who are supporting the officer.

I would guess that everyone believes the girl's behavior was unacceptable and some sort of discipline is warranted. What is unacceptable is the way the officer conducted himself. Seeing as how his employer and the district agree, it makes sense.

But none of you supporting the thug are suggesting what should have been done. The adult wouldn't get up. (18 years old is an adult. Sorry, not sorry) She was ask to leave and she refused everyone down the line, to the point the administrators call on the officer to get involved. What should he have done? Just stood behind her desk and pushed it out into the hall!?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

She was an adult? Not a 14 year old girl like the Leftists are claiming?

That changes a lot.

Who claimed she was 14?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

That's exactly what will happen. When criminal thug "children" are vindicated while police officers are punished, they feel empowered to do more. I'm going to blame the next 20 shootings of blacks on this very event.

 

[Vandalshandle]

None of that was alleged and he certainly isn't facing any charges for it. Sounds like the sack is empty.

Dummy, that's what he was fired for, and that and racism are what the potential Civil Rights violation are based on.

There wasn't enough evidence to charge him, what he did wrong was never specified, all of this is great fodder for the upcoming lawsuit. They should charge him with a crime just for liability sake, but when they lose in his criminal trial, it will boost his civil lawsuit all the more, so they won't.

They don't have to charge with a damn thing in order to fire him and be fully within their rights for his use of excessive force.

They won't charge him because there's no evidence of a crime.

Proof is in the pudding, pop.

There doesn't have to be a crime, dumbass. Excessive Use of Force is a cause for termination, just one of many, most of which are not crimes.

I am a Sheriff's Auxiliary volunteer, and I would get fired if I walk into a grocery store in my uniform and buy a bottle of wine. We are under the exact same P&P 's as the deputies.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Excessive use of force is assault.

No, but it can be. They don't have to wait until he commits a crime to fire him, dumbass.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The cons here think a teenage girl is stronger than a full grown man. They are known for their fear and obedience to anyone they are told to obey.

And then there is the liberal guy who thinks disrupting a class full of students is acceptable. Oh well, I believe in education you believe in violence bubba.

I have seen this idea repeatedly on here.
I don't usually speak for everyone but I haven't seen anyone make that case except those who are supporting the officer.

I would guess that everyone believes the girl's behavior was unacceptable and some sort of discipline is warranted. What is unacceptable is the way the officer conducted himself. Seeing as how his employer and the district agree, it makes sense.

But none of you supporting the thug are suggesting what should have been done. The adult wouldn't get up. (18 years old is an adult. Sorry, not sorry) She was ask to leave and she refused everyone down the line, to the point the administrators call on the officer to get involved. What should he have done? Just stood behind her desk and pushed it out into the hall!?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

She was an adult? Not a 14 year old girl like the Leftists are claiming?

That changes a lot.

Who claimed she was 14?

Hutch Starskey

 

[Asclepias]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

You will only love it if you can have a video. If you were there you would have peed yourself.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

That's exactly what will happen. When criminal thug "children" are vindicated while police officers are punished, they feel empowered to do more. I'm going to blame the next 20 shootings of blacks on this very event.

Now there's a shock, you using any excuse possible to blame the ******* for whatever the hell happens, no matter what.

 

[Asclepias]

And then there is the liberal guy who thinks disrupting a class full of students is acceptable. Oh well, I believe in education you believe in violence bubba.

I have seen this idea repeatedly on here.
I don't usually speak for everyone but I haven't seen anyone make that case except those who are supporting the officer.

I would guess that everyone believes the girl's behavior was unacceptable and some sort of discipline is warranted. What is unacceptable is the way the officer conducted himself. Seeing as how his employer and the district agree, it makes sense.

But none of you supporting the thug are suggesting what should have been done. The adult wouldn't get up. (18 years old is an adult. Sorry, not sorry) She was ask to leave and she refused everyone down the line, to the point the administrators call on the officer to get involved. What should he have done? Just stood behind her desk and pushed it out into the hall!?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

She was an adult? Not a 14 year old girl like the Leftists are claiming?

That changes a lot.

Who claimed she was 14?

Hutch Starskey

No quote?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Excessive use of force is assault.

No, but it can be. They don't have to wait until he commits a crime to fire him, dumbass.

But according to you, he did commit a crime. Why isn't he being charged? His lawyer already has his lawsuit won based in inescapable logic.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I am a Sheriff's Auxiliary volunteer, and I would get fired if I walk into a grocery store in my uniform and buy a bottle of wine. We are under the exact same P&P 's as the deputies.

Yeppers...

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

We are going to see more blacks being out of control and I love it

That's exactly what will happen. When criminal thug "children" are vindicated while police officers are punished, they feel empowered to do more. I'm going to blame the next 20 shootings of blacks on this very event.

Now there's a shock, you using any excuse possible to blame the ******* for whatever the hell happens, no matter what.

Very credible line of causation, yes.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

I have seen this idea repeatedly on here.
I don't usually speak for everyone but I haven't seen anyone make that case except those who are supporting the officer.

I would guess that everyone believes the girl's behavior was unacceptable and some sort of discipline is warranted. What is unacceptable is the way the officer conducted himself. Seeing as how his employer and the district agree, it makes sense.

But none of you supporting the thug are suggesting what should have been done. The adult wouldn't get up. (18 years old is an adult. Sorry, not sorry) She was ask to leave and she refused everyone down the line, to the point the administrators call on the officer to get involved. What should he have done? Just stood behind her desk and pushed it out into the hall!?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

She was an adult? Not a 14 year old girl like the Leftists are claiming?

That changes a lot.

Who claimed she was 14?

Hutch Starskey

No quote?

I just called him on it. Read it your damn self, lazy!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

But according to you, he did commit a crime. Why isn't he being charged? His lawyer already has his lawsuit won based in inescapable logic.

No, he used Excessive Force, which can get you canned in a hurry, obviously.

Works like this, dumbass: fired for excessive use of force - Google Search

 

[Asclepias]

But none of you supporting the thug are suggesting what should have been done. The adult wouldn't get up. (18 years old is an adult. Sorry, not sorry) She was ask to leave and she refused everyone down the line, to the point the administrators call on the officer to get involved. What should he have done? Just stood behind her desk and pushed it out into the hall!?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

She was an adult? Not a 14 year old girl like the Leftists are claiming?

That changes a lot.

Who claimed she was 14?

Hutch Starskey

No quote?

I just called him on it. Read it your damn self, lazy!

You say a lot of dumb shit. Where do I start?