Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

“Administrative Detention Order of Khalida Jarrar Confirmed”

 

[P F Tinmore]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

 

[USAF 2023]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

 

[P F Tinmore]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

 

[USAF 2023]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

 

[P F Tinmore]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

 

[USAF 2023]

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

So you agree they didn’t agree with the “ Two State Solution “ Israel can’t “ kill” what wasn’t there in the first place. GOOD WORK !!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

So you agree they didn’t agree with the “ Two State Solution “ Israel can’t “ kill” what wasn’t there in the first place. GOOD WORK !!!

Arafat was duped into thinking that Oslo was a stepping stone to statehood. Boy was he fooled.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel killed the two state solution.

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

 

[USAF 2023]

Not according to your post. Oslo “ Sold us out” because it didn’t address PRIOR to 1948.

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

You are conflicting your own post.

 

[USAF 2023]

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

You are conflicting your own post.

No I’m not. They are in mourning because the Accords did not address the land prior to 48

 

[Shusha]

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

In September 1993 the world celebrated what it thought was the beginning of the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Oslo Accords was supposed to lead to a “comprehensive peace agreement” by 1999, and eventually, a Palestinian state, with the then newly-founded Palestinian Authority (PA) serving as an interim self-government.

The Oslo Accords signified, as Abu Shakdim put it, “a decision made by a few members of the Palestinian elite” that did not represent the desires of the Palestinian people.

“The whole idea of Oslo is giving the elite Palestinians the power to control a few areas in the West Bank,” she said, “it was created to have shared benefits between the Israelis and a few Palestinians. A few Palestinians got positions of power, and Israel consolidated its control over us.”

Meras al-Azza, a 25-year-old Palestinian refugee living in the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, expressed similar sentiments to Mondoweiss as he sat in his family’s modest courtyard.

“They sold out the Palestinian people,” he said matter of factly, when asked what he thought of the Accords. “Oslo was a great deal for Israel, and Israel alone.”

“Oslo signified the Palestinians giving up the rights to all the lands of pre-1948 Palestine to Israel. That’s two-thirds of our historic lands,” al-Azza, a third generation refugee, said.

‘Oslo sold us out’: Young Palestinians on the moment that shaped their generation

Excellent Post ! Lol. Am I reading this Right; They are objecting to the “ occupation “ in 1948???? They have NO interest in “ The Two State Solution “ Don’t you realize that the more you post the more you make Israel’s position on this matter stronger?
Remember these words; “ Live at Peace with your Neighbor” !!!!

Israel is not a neighbor. It is a colonial project.

Starting in 1948? Just more proof they have no interest in “ The Two State Solution” Keep up the good work

Israel killed the two state solution.

By existing?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Oslo was a shit agreement signed behind the backs of the Palestinians.

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

There is no relevant international law and there never was a two state solution, just a two state illusion.

 

[P F Tinmore]

lol Behind the backs of which Palestinians? It was signed by Arafat, who had the unwavering support of the vast majority of those who called themselves Palestinians.

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

There is no relevant international law and there never was a two state solution, just a two state illusion.

Indeed, there is no legal requirement for a two state solution.

 

[toomuchtime_]

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

There is no relevant international law and there never was a two state solution, just a two state illusion.

Indeed, there is no legal requirement for a two state solution.

I agree with you that Oslo never should have been signed, and in fact, Israel should never have allowed the PLO to return from Tunisia.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In other words, you agree that Arafat legitimately represented the Palestinian people when he signed Oslo and that you were wrong in asserting it was signed behind their backs. On the other hand, Rabin clearly did not represent the majority of Israelis when he signed Oslo, and was only bowing down to US pressure from the infamous Clintons. It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It only passed the Knesset by one vote and without Clinton's boot on its neck, Israel would never have signed it.

It was never ratified by the Palestinians.

Translation ; They don’t accept the “ Two State Solution “ which meame they have no interest in “ International Law “.

There is no relevant international law and there never was a two state solution, just a two state illusion.

Indeed, there is no legal requirement for a two state solution.

I agree with you that Oslo never should have been signed, and in fact, Israel should never have allowed the PLO to return from Tunisia.

Israel thought it was the best way to dismantle the First Intifada.