we DO know that Palin never actually tried to ban ANY book, this woman has admitted thatSo we don't know the truth then ...
so that blows "chris" theory out of the water and makes him look like the moron he is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we DO know that Palin never actually tried to ban ANY book, this woman has admitted thatSo we don't know the truth then ...
nice way to avoid my actual question
your question was not a specific question it was general, thus my response was also general
Fair 'nuff.
To answer your question, I say it's a case by case basis.
For instance, if The Catcher in the Rye on a 5th grade reading list I could understand taking it off that list. But at the same time i would be against "banning" it from the school system.
same hereFair 'nuff.
To answer your question, I say it's a case by case basis.
For instance, if The Catcher in the Rye on a 5th grade reading list I could understand taking it off that list. But at the same time i would be against "banning" it from the school system.
another one i can agree withNot only that but they wouldn't understand the significance or value of it.
Personally, I think Catcher in the Rye should be a requirement on any high school list of books to cover in the school year.
another one i can agree with
I'd put Harrison Bergeron on any high school's required reading list.
High school reading list?
Don't forget The Scarlet Letter
sorry kirk, thats a fail
asking about the procedure is not actually wanting to ban books
did you not read the rest of the thread before posting that?o i beg to disagree, why ask about the procedure then? If you ask professionals the way to do something...it does show a clear intent.
I do not trust book banners...there is no negoiciation to this...its very simple to me....no book banning ...period....of any kind ...for any reason.....i dont care if we got 2 mommies 2 daddies....or seil heil or what the hell aryans read nows...i do not support banning any of it.
we have seen the results of this type of actions before. I know we know what spines are for this time,....no book banning of any type.
o i beg to disagree, why ask about the procedure then? If you ask professionals the way to do something...it does show a clear intent.
I do not trust book banners...there is no negoiciation to this...its very simple to me....no book banning ...period....of any kind ...for any reason.....i dont care if we got 2 mommies 2 daddies....or seil heil or what the hell aryans read nows...i do not support banning any of it.
we have seen the results of this type of actions before. I know we know what spines are for this time,....no book banning of any type.
o i beg to disagree, why ask about the procedure then? If you ask professionals the way to do something...it does show a clear intent.
I do not trust book banners...
maybe she wanted to know how to respond to any inquiries by the fringe elements of her constituency...? how else is she supposed to know about the library procedures of alaska if she doesn't inquire about them when she first enters the governor's office? the fact is she didn't actually remove any books from the library or even say that she intended to...i haven't read anything to convince me that sarah palin has the political agenda of fanatical book banning.
She fired the librarian who stood up to her, but then backed off when the community came to the librarian's defense. The fact that she asked about banning books three times is all I need to know. She is not someone who should be vice president.
got a link for those "facts" ?
the problem there is your links never actually BACK your positionOh, for Christ's sake, read the first part of this thread.
Oh, for Christ's sake, read the first part of this thread.