Parliament vs. Trump

[Pogo]

I don't know any "morons" -- perhaps Donald Rump can point them out -- but no, I've never heard that. But diga me this:

If that's true, then what the fuck business is it of ours what Natalie Maines says to a concert audience in London?

Once again ---- can't have it both ways. It seems we're making this same point over and over.
Wonder why.

The idea of a group, such as a nation, with loyalty supposedly between it's members, means that when one is insulting a fellow member of that group to an outsider, that person is showing disloyalty.

That is why it matters.

She was taking internal disagreements and using it to pander to people outside the group at the expense of the group as a whole.

Again --- who the fuck is this "she"? What thread are you even in?

Where do you get "disloyalty" out of your personal rules for what the British Parliament is allowed to opine on? Where exactly do you derive that?

See, this is exactly what I mean by hero-worship personality cult. Your Dear Leader gets criticized, not only does he melt down ---- you do too. Your relationship with this man is entirely emotional.

Natalie Maines, who you brought up is the "she".

It is disloyal of an American to badmouth the President of this nation to a foreign crowd.

Save your odd pop culture nonsense about "personality cult". I explained my reasons, you jerk.

This is funny. This is hilarious. First, Trump is not our president, and not likely to be so. Second, you all have been badmouthing, in the extreme, our president ever since the moment he was elected. You are the ones who are so quintessentially disloyal.

Natalie Maines badmouthed President GWBush during his term. I'm not the one that brought her up..

You DID post "politics ends at the water" or whatever the quote was.

How come that applies when you want it to, yet magically ceases to apply when it's your authoritarian hero-boi?

Whelp --- that's why I keep noting Double Standard.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Policy differences is one thing.

Going after a potentially leader personally, another.

They were irresponsible and undiplomatic.

You think the British parliament is being irresponsible and undiplomatic? Seriously, what kind of brain do you have? Did you get it at a flea market?

I've already posted my reasons for stating that repeatedly.

SO, your post, where you pretend to be shocked by the fact that I don't hold the same opinion as you is nothing but filler.

And the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion.

And your personal attacks are the Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem.

So, if you have nothing else to add, please keep your filler from wasting my time.

Screw you.

 

[Pogo]

There is actually a big difference. The retoric used by Trump is blatently, racist,....

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

There is actually a big difference. The retoric used by Trump is blatently, racist,....

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

If he first sais Mexico doesnt send his best, then specifies they send those with problems and then names those problems as criminals ,drug addicts or rapist and then actually sais some I ASSUME ,are good ppl. You don't find it at all racist?

You are right tough I have to stand corrected he didn't call them all rapist. He named them drug addicts and simple criminals too with of course the exeption of some.

The way I read it, they're criminals, drug-bringers AND rapists, all three. And some of those triple-threats are "good people".

Gotta wonder how he determines that.

 

[Correll]

Save your race card for some one who gives a damn.

And yes, I do think the break down of civility in our politics is a problem for the rest of the world to see.

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

 

[Correll]

There is actually a big difference. The retoric used by Trump is blatently, racist,....

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

There is actually a big difference. The retoric used by Trump is blatently, racist,....

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

If he first sais Mexico doesnt send his best, then specifies they send those with problems and then names those problems as criminals ,drug addicts or rapist and then actually sais some I ASSUME ,are good ppl. You don't find it at all racist?

You are right tough I have to stand corrected he didn't call them all rapist. He named them drug addicts and simple criminals too with of course the exeption of some.

Where are you from?

 

[Pogo]

Save your race card for some one who gives a damn.

And yes, I do think the break down of civility in our politics is a problem for the rest of the world to see.

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

Yeah it must be weird to be painted into a corner by your own posts.

 

[Correll]

Policy differences is one thing.

Going after a potentially leader personally, another.

They were irresponsible and undiplomatic.

You think the British parliament is being irresponsible and undiplomatic? Seriously, what kind of brain do you have? Did you get it at a flea market?

I've already posted my reasons for stating that repeatedly.

SO, your post, where you pretend to be shocked by the fact that I don't hold the same opinion as you is nothing but filler.

And the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion.

And your personal attacks are the Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem.

So, if you have nothing else to add, please keep your filler from wasting my time.

Screw you.

Is Esmeralda a potential world leader? Then your little game there was stupid.

 

[Correll]

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

I stopped reading there.

Screw you.

Well screw you is actually pretty good as a comeback and I like how you try to say I'm just beiing polliticly correct but since you're a Trump supporter I won't have to bring up all the footage, Quotes etc. Because you like it when he call most Mexican immegrants rapist; If you feel you can show me that any of te names I used for Trump are lies I will gladly stand corrected.

I find that hard to believe but on the off chance you are telling the truth here you go.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”


As you can see he did NOT call the "most" of Mexican immigrants rapists.

He listed a list of problems that Third World Immigrants bring with them, including various types of crime, such as rape.

If he first sais Mexico doesnt send his best, then specifies they send those with problems and then names those problems as criminals ,drug addicts or rapist and then actually sais some I ASSUME ,are good ppl. You don't find it at all racist?

You are right tough I have to stand corrected he didn't call them all rapist. He named them drug addicts and simple criminals too with of course the exeption of some.

The way I read it, they're criminals, drug-bringers AND rapists, all three. And some of those triple-threats are "good people".

Gotta wonder how he determines that.

Says the lib who is pretending to not understand how a list works.

Libs. All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Different rules apply INSIDE a political campaign then in international relations.

I'm sorry that I didn't explain that to you. I thought you were smart enough to realize that painfully obvious fact.

I will adjust my view of your intelligence downward.

I love it when idiots attack other peoples intelligence. Whatever helps you sleep at night smarty pants. Really think about the statement you just made and maybe you will see the hypocrisy.

"It's ok for insiders to act like irresponsible undiplomatic babies as long as they are campaigning because they only have to work with the president in government. Outside countries have much more responsibility to work together and get things done so they need to keep their opinions to themselves and play nice."

hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies

1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

Different rules apply INSIDE a political campaign then in international relations.

I'm sorry that I didn't explain that to you. I thought you were smart enough to realize that painfully obvious fact.

I will adjust my view of your intelligence downward.

I love it when idiots attack other peoples intelligence. Whatever helps you sleep at night smarty pants. Really think about the statement you just made and maybe you will see the hypocrisy.

"It's ok for insiders to act like irresponsible undiplomatic babies as long as they are campaigning because they only have to work with the president in government. Outside countries have much more responsibility to work together and get things done so they need to keep their opinions to themselves and play nice."

hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies

1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

 

[Correll]

Save your race card for some one who gives a damn.

And yes, I do think the break down of civility in our politics is a problem for the rest of the world to see.

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

Yeah it must be weird to be painted into a corner by your own posts.

NOtice does not equal insult the potential next President of the United States.

 

[Correll]

I love it when idiots attack other peoples intelligence. Whatever helps you sleep at night smarty pants. Really think about the statement you just made and maybe you will see the hypocrisy.

"It's ok for insiders to act like irresponsible undiplomatic babies as long as they are campaigning because they only have to work with the president in government. Outside countries have much more responsibility to work together and get things done so they need to keep their opinions to themselves and play nice."

hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies

1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I love it when idiots attack other peoples intelligence. Whatever helps you sleep at night smarty pants. Really think about the statement you just made and maybe you will see the hypocrisy.

"It's ok for insiders to act like irresponsible undiplomatic babies as long as they are campaigning because they only have to work with the president in government. Outside countries have much more responsibility to work together and get things done so they need to keep their opinions to themselves and play nice."

hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies

1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

 

[Pogo]

Save your race card for some one who gives a damn.

And yes, I do think the break down of civility in our politics is a problem for the rest of the world to see.

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

Yeah it must be weird to be painted into a corner by your own posts.

NOtice does not equal insult the potential next President of the United States.

We'll ask once AGAIN....

Where in the Blue Fuck do you get this "right to not be offended" crapola?
It's one thing if you can't take an insult, but wetting your pants because your hero-Führer gets called out for the bigot he is?

Really? You might need some professional help.

 

[Carla_Danger]

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

The one who's calling for war crimes? He's not going to be our next President.

 

[Correll]

The idea of a group, such as a nation, with loyalty supposedly between it's members, means that when one is insulting a fellow member of that group to an outsider, that person is showing disloyalty.

That is why it matters.

She was taking internal disagreements and using it to pander to people outside the group at the expense of the group as a whole.

Again --- who the fuck is this "she"? What thread are you even in?

Where do you get "disloyalty" out of your personal rules for what the British Parliament is allowed to opine on? Where exactly do you derive that?

See, this is exactly what I mean by hero-worship personality cult. Your Dear Leader gets criticized, not only does he melt down ---- you do too. Your relationship with this man is entirely emotional.

Natalie Maines, who you brought up is the "she".

It is disloyal of an American to badmouth the President of this nation to a foreign crowd.

Save your odd pop culture nonsense about "personality cult". I explained my reasons, you jerk.

This is funny. This is hilarious. First, Trump is not our president, and not likely to be so. Second, you all have been badmouthing, in the extreme, our president ever since the moment he was elected. You are the ones who are so quintessentially disloyal.

Natalie Maines badmouthed President GWBush during his term. I'm not the one that brought her up..

You DID post "politics ends at the water" or whatever the quote was.

How come that applies when you want it to, yet magically ceases to apply when it's your authoritarian hero-boi?

Whelp --- that's why I keep noting Double Standard.

What are you on about old man?

 

[Correll]

Save your race card for some one who gives a damn.

And yes, I do think the break down of civility in our politics is a problem for the rest of the world to see.

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

Yeah it must be weird to be painted into a corner by your own posts.

NOtice does not equal insult the potential next President of the United States.

We'll ask once AGAIN....

Where in the Blue Fuck do you get this "right to not be offended" crapola?
It's one thing if you can't take an insult, but wetting your pants because your hero-Führer gets called out for the bigot he is?

Really? You might need some professional help.

I said nothing about a Right to not be offended.

I just pointed out that it is irresponsible and undiplomatic of the UK parliament to insult a man who may very well be the Next President of the United States.

YOur hysterical "pants wetting" nonsense is noted and dismissed.

Your partisan hack Godwin smear is noted and dismissed. Please consider it, and you, to be ridiculed as pathetic, and absurd.

 

[Correll]

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

The one who's calling for war crimes?

I didn't ask you your opinion on his policy positions.

I asked you a simple question that you dodged because there was no way you could answer it without A. admitting I was right, or B. looking like the completely dishonest morons the rest of the libs in this thread look like.

I repeat.


So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

 

[Carla_Danger]

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

The one who's calling for war crimes?

I didn't ask you your opinion on his policy positions.

I asked you a simple question that you dodged because there was no way you could answer it without A. admitting I was right, or B. looking like the completely dishonest morons the rest of the libs in this thread look like.

I repeat.


So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

If they're calling for war crimes, absolutely.

Donald Drumpf is not the President, he's a reality TV show host, you moron.

 

[forkup]

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

My point stands. If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

That you don't understand the difference between a political campaign and international relations or why there might be different rules and expectations for the two, is you being a moron.

Then I shudder to think what the same reasoning makes you with your hero-worship personality cult double standard.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

You are an asshole.

Trump is not my "hero", he is the candidate that most agrees with me on the issues, thus he has my support.

My point stands.

If Trump is President, the British will have to deal with him though his term(s).

Insulting the possible leader of the most powerful nation in the world is irresponsible and undiplomatic.

I'm probably asking alot but would it be at all possible to try to see it from an European standpoint.Trump is a guy who sais it's alright to torture someone he considers an enemy. Its even alright to go after the family of said enemy. He by admission sais he's simply gonna bully al the nations of the world into doing what he sais and you call the British undiplomatic. Pretty ironic if you ask me

Correll is an idiot. Ignore her.

So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

The one who's calling for war crimes?

I didn't ask you your opinion on his policy positions.

I asked you a simple question that you dodged because there was no way you could answer it without A. admitting I was right, or B. looking like the completely dishonest morons the rest of the libs in this thread look like.

I repeat.


So do you think it is diplomatic for the UK parliament to personally insult the possibly next President of the United States?

No it isn't. Btw a very smart question. I'll ask you another question did they mean to be diplomatic? My assertion is this they feel that by speaking out against Trump they might be able to sway a few independent voters.Much in the way the republican establishment tries to sway votes away from him.

 

[Pogo]

So now -- all of a sudden -- it IS OK for the British Parliament to notice.

I just felt the earth move.

??? You're being very weird, and dishonest.

Yeah it must be weird to be painted into a corner by your own posts.

NOtice does not equal insult the potential next President of the United States.

We'll ask once AGAIN....

Where in the Blue Fuck do you get this "right to not be offended" crapola?
It's one thing if you can't take an insult, but wetting your pants because your hero-Führer gets called out for the bigot he is?

Really? You might need some professional help.

I said nothing about a Right to not be offended.

I just pointed out that it is irresponsible and undiplomatic of the UK parliament to insult a man who may very well be the Next President of the United States.

Well you've contradicted your own post, so ---- saves me the trouble.

No one has a right to not be insulted. Especially after they've baited those insults and in so doing, insulted the entire populace of his own country.

I don't know what kind of unicorn planet you live on where that's the rule but as we said long ago---- fucking grow a pair already.

 

[HenryBHough]

Brits will understand when they're required to get visas to come to America on holiday.