kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
It really wasn't hearsay.
She simply repeated what she was told.
You lost me, repeating what she was told is what hearsay means
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It really wasn't hearsay.
She simply repeated what she was told.
No, she is NOT allowed to give testimony of what the SS told her.
And the SS never told her that Trump tried to "grab the wheel".
Well, that clears up why they had a "witness" who knew nothing testify, vermin
Repeatedly calling other poster "vermin". How to tell us you're a member of a Cult without saying you're a member of a cult.
You clowns need a new act. Your Lord and Saviour barely got 51% of the vote at the Iowa Caucuses even though nearly 70% of the people there think that Trump really did win the 2020 election. If more than 2/3 of caucus voters believe his lies, but 1/3 of those true believers still voted for someone else to be your candidate, Trump's campaign is in trouble.
Donations are WAY down.
The turnout on Tuesday was the lowest since 2000.
49% of Iowa Republicans didn't vote.
Add the total DeSatan and Nimatata Nikki Randhawa (Haley) received on Tuesday and the total Iowa Republicans who did NOT vote P01135809 jumps to 89.3%. Not good.
Isn't lower turn out supposed to favour Trump???? Why go out into the cold since neither Haley nor DeSantis are going to win or even come close to it? Trump supporters are supposed to be willing to die for their Saviour.
How can you be certain that the 49% of the Republicans who stayed home would vote for Trump. 68% of the people who WENT to the caucuses said Trump won the 2020 election and Biden is an "illegitimate President". Yet 1/3 of those people voted for Haley or DeSantis
Suck it up, buttercup. You reap what you sow.
She is getting more attention than she deservesView attachment 887932
Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.
Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.
The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.
Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.
But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.
More at the link below...
I Recommend WPX Hosting
Two thumbs up - I recently switched to WPX Hosting and recommend their speed, service and security - they do know what they are talking about when it comes to WordPress hosting.washingtonpress.com
Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?
Not at allShe is getting more attention than she deserves
Her testimony was nothing more than hearsay with no witnesses to back her up
The lead story for libs wasNot at all
She was a member of Trumps staff and was present for most of what she testified to
What was Trump told?
How did he react?
It didn't age well....but let's face it...the whole narrative now from both sides is 50/50 fact/Bullshit..So much so that it is no longer possible to put stock in anything at all in the mass media.The lead story for libs was
“TRUMP ATTACKS SECRET SERVICE AND TRIES TO WRESTLE STEERING WHEEL AWAY” *
* according to someone who was not even there
So she lied under oathView attachment 887932
Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.
Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.
The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.
Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.
But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.
More at the link below...
I Recommend WPX Hosting
Two thumbs up - I recently switched to WPX Hosting and recommend their speed, service and security - they do know what they are talking about when it comes to WordPress hosting.washingtonpress.com
Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?
Lib lies that lead to apathy hurt trumpIt didn't age well....but let's face it...the whole narrative now from both sides is 50/50 fact/Bullshit..So much so that it is no longer possible to put stock in anything at all in the mass media.
????????????????Lib lies that lead to apathy hurt trump
Just another Trump throws a tantrum storyThe lead story for libs was
“TRUMP ATTACKS SECRET SERVICE AND TRIES TO WRESTLE STEERING WHEEL AWAY” *
* according to someone who was not even there
She said she was told that.So she lied under oath
Don’t Republicans get charged for that??
She said she was told that.
She repeated what she was told and what she overheard and what she saw, yes.