Dragon
Senior Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 5,481
- 588
- 48
really? when does the violence start? we all would like to be prepared.
Hopefully that won't be necessary.
Si modo, do you have any proof yet that that photo isn't a Photoshopped fake?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
really? when does the violence start? we all would like to be prepared.
I had to do some serious 'researching' to find articles about the tea party rallies.............I can't even turn on a channel (radio/tv) without hearing about these useful idiots...........
Your own experience is misleading. The Tea Party got serious coverage from its first days in 2008. Even the tiniest, most insignificant TP rallies got media coverage. There have been left-leaning protests and rallies going on in a lot of cities for a couple of years now, but they hardly ever got a mention on the mainstream media except one time when one of them was disrupted by a TP counter-rally. Generally speaking, the MSM ignores protests on the left except when they're so big there's no option but to cover them, and so far that's happened only twice, with the protests in Wisconsin and now with OWS.
It could be that will change in the future, now that OWS has broken the ice so to speak, but in the past that's how it's been.
Thankfully, despite these morons getting more attention than they deserve by ALL media, they are waking up 'we the people' .........you thought the 2010 elections were a 'shellacking'?
You ain't seen nuttin yet.
First off, the media have been much more reluctant to cover OWS than they were to cover the Tea Party, which got a lot more attention when it had much less going on. So you're way off there.
Second, I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch if I were you. Solid majorities of the public are with the movement on the issues, and the movement itself has more favorable than unfavorable response according to the only poll that's been done so far (by Rasmussen, which probably means it's skewed toward the "unfavorable" side -- and even so it shows the movement is pretty popular).
This is more likely to work for the Democrats than against them, especially if they do embrace it.
Thankfully, despite these morons getting more attention than they deserve by ALL media, they are waking up 'we the people' .........you thought the 2010 elections were a 'shellacking'?
You ain't seen nuttin yet.
First off, the media have been much more reluctant to cover OWS than they were to cover the Tea Party, which got a lot more attention when it had much less going on. So you're way off there.
Second, I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch if I were you. Solid majorities of the public are with the movement on the issues, and the movement itself has more favorable than unfavorable response according to the only poll that's been done so far (by Rasmussen, which probably means it's skewed toward the "unfavorable" side -- and even so it shows the movement is pretty popular).
This is more likely to work for the Democrats than against them, especially if they do embrace it.
Just so you know. Here in my blue state the local news is reporting them as nut jobs, showing all of the arrests.
Make it a campaign issue Im sure it will resonate.
they already have embraced it !!! capitalism is under attack by communism in AMERICA !!!!Thankfully, despite these morons getting more attention than they deserve by ALL media, they are waking up 'we the people' .........you thought the 2010 elections were a 'shellacking'?
You ain't seen nuttin yet.
First off, the media have been much more reluctant to cover OWS than they were to cover the Tea Party, which got a lot more attention when it had much less going on. So you're way off there.
Second, I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch if I were you. Solid majorities of the public are with the movement on the issues, and the movement itself has more favorable than unfavorable response according to the only poll that's been done so far (by Rasmussen, which probably means it's skewed toward the "unfavorable" side -- and even so it shows the movement is pretty popular).
This is more likely to work for the Democrats than against them, especially if they do embrace it.
personal failure and the inability to take responsibility for their own actions !! they need someone to take care of their perceived injustices and tell them that the problems they have is someone else fault and that those villains will be punished for not allowing them to prosper !! it is a mental illness that can only be cured by the barter system !! the barter system would force these sick people to work and produce their own goods for trade !! the result would be the return of natural selection which would wipe out most liberals in this country !!..................................or we could just kick their stupid asses !!they already have embraced it !!! capitalism is under attack by communism in AMERICA !!!!First off, the media have been much more reluctant to cover OWS than they were to cover the Tea Party, which got a lot more attention when it had much less going on. So you're way off there.
Second, I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch if I were you. Solid majorities of the public are with the movement on the issues, and the movement itself has more favorable than unfavorable response according to the only poll that's been done so far (by Rasmussen, which probably means it's skewed toward the "unfavorable" side -- and even so it shows the movement is pretty popular).
This is more likely to work for the Democrats than against them, especially if they do embrace it.
Right. Truly what on earth makes so many people wish for communism.
really? when does the violence start? we all would like to be prepared.
Hopefully that won't be necessary.
Si modo, do you have any proof yet that that photo isn't a Photoshopped fake?
It has what effect?Driving what bus?
In any case..concentrating wealth into a small section of the population, generally has this effect.
But so far so good. It's pretty peaceful considering the wealth disparity.
You do realize the above sets some kind of new record for incoherence, I hope.
The point is that yes, the protesters are protesting against the Obama administration, among other things, as being too cozy with Wall Street. It's a deserved accusation, too.
You do realize the above sets some kind of new record for incoherence, I hope.
The point is that yes, the protesters are protesting against the Obama administration, among other things, as being too cozy with Wall Street. It's a deserved accusation, too.
In other words, Obama isn't enough of a commie for them. Does that sum it up?
no he hasn't !!! he just needs 4 more yrs with nothing to lose to set things right with them !!! .....if he is reelected you will see the true communist face he has been hinting at with his writings and his policies !!You do realize the above sets some kind of new record for incoherence, I hope.
The point is that yes, the protesters are protesting against the Obama administration, among other things, as being too cozy with Wall Street. It's a deserved accusation, too.
In other words, Obama isn't enough of a commie for them. Does that sum it up?
They would have to run Van Jones or Ayers to get left enough within the US. Maybe someone from commie party of the USA. Obama has stabbed the left in the back.
Thankfully, despite these morons getting more attention than they deserve by ALL media, they are waking up 'we the people' .........you thought the 2010 elections were a 'shellacking'?
You ain't seen nuttin yet.
First off, the media have been much more reluctant to cover OWS than they were to cover the Tea Party, which got a lot more attention when it had much less going on. So you're way off there.
Second, I wouldn't count your chickens before they hatch if I were you. Solid majorities of the public are with the movement on the issues, and the movement itself has more favorable than unfavorable response according to the only poll that's been done so far (by Rasmussen, which probably means it's skewed toward the "unfavorable" side -- and even so it shows the movement is pretty popular).
This is more likely to work for the Democrats than against them, especially if they do embrace it.
the fed chairman ??? I thought you guys hated the banks ??Bernanke came out and said he understood the anger as well as admitting that the shennigans were morally wrong.
Hate?
And who is "you guys"?
Bernanke was appointed by George W. Bush.
I suppose I could request the original electronic file of the image and send it to a forensics lab in Quantico to determine if it is photoshopped or not, but I'm not so inclined to do so. I should have linked to the source; I apologize for not doing that originally. Occupy Wall Street: Shocking photos show protester defecating on POLICE CAR | Mail Onlinereally? when does the violence start? we all would like to be prepared.
Hopefully that won't be necessary.
Si modo, do you have any proof yet that that photo isn't a Photoshopped fake?
the fed chairman ??? I thought you guys hated the banks ??Bernanke came out and said he understood the anger as well as admitting that the shennigans were morally wrong.
Source, please?Here is the blog post that started OWS:
On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months, one statement says. Like our brothers and sisters in Egypt, Greece, Spain, and Iceland, we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America. We also encourage the use of nonviolence to achieve our ends and maximize the safety of all participants.