Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why was is so hard to produce those fraudulent ballots for the courts. Where are they? And the ID's would be evidence too. Where are they and why if they exist, was Trump and his lawyers so incompetent to not submit them to the courts?There are thousands of affidavits and 100s of cases of eyewitness testimony of Fraudulent Ballots found and 100s of thousands of Fake IDs confiscated that were shipped to this country no doubt by China
They never did a full audit and once you dump fraudulent ballots in with legitimate ones, there is no way to separate them. They are counted just the same. Democrats have been gaming the system and rigging elections since before John Dailey. What rock did you crawl out from?Then why was is so hard to produce those fraudulent ballots for the courts. Where are they? And the ID's would be evidence too. Where are they and why if they exist, was Trump and his lawyers so incompetent to not submit them to the courts?
Always seems to be that they find boxes and boxes of democratic ballots in close elections.Valid ballots need to be counted regardless of the party
This is just page one of the search:I’m sick of these bullshit claims
Prove that
search.yahoo.com
So they produced no fraudulent ballots by your own admission here, no way to validate the affidavits, making them hearsay like the judge said. What about the ID's that would provide you with some supporting evidence, Got any of those?They never did a full audit and once you dump fraudulent ballots in with legitimate ones, there is no way to separate them. They are counted just the same. Democrats have been gaming the system and rigging elections since before John Dailey. What rock did you crawl out from?
He admitted no such thing.So they produced no fraudulent ballots by your own admission here,
"and once you dump fraudulent ballots in with legitimate ones, there is no way to separate them."He admitted no such thing.
Try reading for comprehension.
Always seems to be that they find boxes and boxes of democratic ballots in close elections.
"and once you dump fraudulent ballots in with legitimate ones, there is no way to separate them."
Perhaps he is wrong on both counts but either way no massive amount of fraudulent ballots or proof that they ever existed was submitted to the courts, not ever.
But these New Republicans, groo.....ops....conditioned by Benedict Donald, aren't bright enough to figure that out or they're lying on purpose.Republicans have this fantasy that fraudulent votes are mixed in with legitimate votes to steal an election
If fraudulent votes are added, the total number of votes counted will not match the totals votes recorded in the election books the voters sign.
Easy to catch
Republicans have this fantasy that fraudulent votes are mixed in with legitimate votes to steal an election
If fraudulent votes are added, the total number of votes counted will not match the totals votes recorded in the election books the voters sign.
Easy to catch
With absentee ballots, it is hard to tell who hasn’t cast a ballot till way after the election. You would see hundreds of duplicate votes…..You don‘tAnother smirking response from USMb's biggest fan of dominion machines...
The sign above is right. There is only one motive to delay producing election results, the motive to cheat.
The dominion fraud requires time. First step, which registered voters did not vote - those are going to be the fraud ballots. Dominion machines answer that minutes after polls close. Time to print fraud ballots.
All of the cheat states delay results for the above and other forms of cheating.
With absentee ballots, it is hard to tell who hasn’t cast a ballot till way after the election. You would see hundreds of duplicate votes…..You don‘t
Then you would have to provide accurate forgeries of those voters signature
Doesnt happen
Dominion machines know what happened to absentees, liar.
A forgery is easy if you know Chris Wray is on your side.
Yep. Like no one would notice a significant percentage jump in the number of registered voters after Election Day.Republicans have this fantasy that fraudulent votes are mixed in with legitimate votes to steal an election
If fraudulent votes are added, the total number of votes counted will not match the totals votes recorded in the election books the voters sign.
Easy to catch
This? What's phony about it?Because our voting system is screwed up. THose GOP idiots who control the state legislature gave the demrats a blank check with that phony act 77.
www.npr.org
Great. Now show us that all those “found” ballots are not legitimate.I'm just telling the truth. There have been a few occasions in close elections where democrats mysteriously found several boxes of ballots after election day that they still wanted counted. It always seems to be democrats finding them, not Republicans.
Ironic huh?This? What's phony about it?
Pennsylvania's mail-in voting law has been upheld by the state's Supreme Court, allowing all voters in the key swing state to cast ballots by mail in November and for other future elections.
In a 5-2 decision released Tuesday, the Democratic-majority court overturned a lower court's ruling from January that found Pennsylvania's Act 77 to be in violation of the state's constitution.
"We find no restriction in our Constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting," Justice Christine Donohue wrote in the majority opinion.
POLITICS
A mail-in voting law is under attack by Pennsylvania GOP lawmakers who passed it
The state law, which passed with bipartisan support in 2019, has become a main focal point in a Republican-driven campaign against mail-in voting in Pennsylvania.
The integrity of what was once a largely uncontentious voting option has been subjected to baseless attacks from former President Donald Trump and his allies, leading many GOP lawmakers to make an about-face on their initial support for mail-in voting.
In fact, the lawsuit that was heard by the courts was brought in part by a group of Republicans in the Pennsylvania state House who helped pass Act 77.
Pennsylvania's mail-in voting law is upheld by the state's Supreme Court
All voters in the key swing state can continue casting ballots by mail now that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld a law that was challenged by some GOP state lawmakers who helped pass it.
Yep! And even beyond so!Ironic huh?
