colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
You may choose to live in a bubble, but do you have to drag others down there too?Anyone that questions that - should simply be dismissed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may choose to live in a bubble, but do you have to drag others down there too?Anyone that questions that - should simply be dismissed.
Punting the ball back to the state legislatures of PA, GA, WI, and MI to sort through or to the House for a final determination sounds like the perfect solution for the SCOTUS to obey the letter of the law while ducking the responsibility of having to chose who wins a Presidential election.We are already to the stage - of course, but is there a remedy?
I think its worth consideringDo you think a belief is true because it's widely held?
I don’t think you understand what that means.HOLY SHIT!!!! That Prelim is filled to the brim with FUCKING ASS HURT!!!
So if SCOTUS plays along, it's a delaying tactic to use against the EC? But I thought every state but Wisconsin was now protected by safe harbor?Punting the ball back to the state legislatures of PA, GA, WI, and MI to sort through or to the House for a final determination sounds like the perfect solution for the SCOTUS to obey the letter of the law while ducking the responsibility of having to chose who wins a Presidential election.We are already to the stage - of course, but is there a remedy?
Brief
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Since Election Day, State and Federal courts
throughout the country have been flooded with frivo-
lous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths
of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the elec-
tion. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the
cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate
elections in four states for yielding results with which
it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its
original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred
candidate for President is legally indefensible and is an
afront to principles of constitutional democracy.
HOLY SHIT!!!! That Prelim is filled to the brim with FUCKING ASS HURT!!!
Why do you repeat yourself?The Pa. supreme court speaks for the Democrat party not for the people of Pennsylvania, commie bastards that they are.
You mean any outcome where biden wins is goodWhy would they be hurt? Biden won.
But 19 states and counting disagree
/——/ Formatting is tough when you’re drunk.Brief
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Since Election Day, State and Federal courts
throughout the country have been flooded with frivo-
lous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths
of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the elec-
tion. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the
cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate
elections in four states for yielding results with which
it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its
original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred
candidate for President is legally indefensible and is an
afront to principles of constitutional democracy.
HOLY SHIT!!!! That Prelim is filled to the brim with FUCKING ASS HURT!!!
I went to the school of redundancy school.Why do you repeat yourself?The Pa. supreme court speaks for the Democrat party not for the people of Pennsylvania, commie bastards that they are.
not yet he hasnt,,,Why would they be hurt? Biden won.
has nothing to do with me,, its just the way the rules are written,,not yet he hasnt,,,Why would they be hurt? Biden won.
I guess that's your little secret, huh?
View attachment 427796
Basically "you're ugly and your momma dresses you funny"....Those fuckchops are in a world of hurt.Brief
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Since Election Day, State and Federal courts
throughout the country have been flooded with frivo-
lous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths
of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the elec-
tion. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the
cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate
elections in four states for yielding results with which
it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its
original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred
candidate for President is legally indefensible and is an
afront to principles of constitutional democracy.
HOLY SHIT!!!! That Prelim is filled to the brim with FUCKING ASS HURT!!!