Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessaryDid the Founding Fathers just write documents to free themselves from the British?That’s strangeNo, they intended the Second to authorize the destruction of the tyranny which would destroy the Constitution and Republic. They quite clearly said so.Wrong.
‘Liberty’ has nothing to do with magazine capacity – or guns, for that matter.
Our liberty is protected by the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law, not guns.
Guns are for individual self-defense from crime – not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’
There is nothing in Second Amendment jurisprudence that authorizes insurrectionist dogma – the Framers did not amend the Founding Document to authorize the destruction of the Constitution and Republic they had created.
At least make a token effort to keep up.
It says something about well regulated militias
It is the Constitution that destroys tyranny
No.
They shot them. With guns.
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Total bullshitI love the term "military grade". The military often if not always buys from the low bidder. My Colt M4 Carbine/LE6920 (civilian version) is higher quality than what the military buys. It is "civilian grade". While the AR-15 is not used by the military, if used in an armed conflict then it officially becomes a "weapon of war", which is the other term the Left loves to harp on. Lol!
LolLolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessaryDid the Founding Fathers just write documents to free themselves from the British?That’s strangeNo, they intended the Second to authorize the destruction of the tyranny which would destroy the Constitution and Republic. They quite clearly said so.
At least make a token effort to keep up.
It says something about well regulated militias
It is the Constitution that destroys tyranny
No.
They shot them. With guns.
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
When has our country ever needed a second amendment to defend our freedom?LolLolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessaryDid the Founding Fathers just write documents to free themselves from the British?That’s strange
It says something about well regulated militias
It is the Constitution that destroys tyranny
No.
They shot them. With guns.
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
Just the existence of the Second Amendment is needed... obviously
LolWhen has our country ever needed a second amendment to defend our freedom?LolLolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessaryDid the Founding Fathers just write documents to free themselves from the British?
No.
They shot them. With guns.
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
Just the existence of the Second Amendment is needed... obviously
That can happen with any firearm.You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders
I’m with you...
Why should someone involved in a mass killing have to reload?
Didn't watch the video did you ?
I’m with you brother
Why should someone have to stop killing just to reload?
Since I fully believe in allowing people - such as yourself - who have no idea what they're talking about embarrass themselves as much as possible, I 'll give you the opportunity to prove for your claim that 30-rd magazines "put more of a stress on the AR than it's designed to take when you have to handle it a little rough".LOL, you can't win this one with insults....Another claim you know you cannot supportRead what you just typed. You used the M-16 as the weapon for the 30 round. I used the civilian AR-15 that isn't made nearly as well as the Military Grade M-16.Funny... all mine have come with 30s...When you purchased an AR-15, the standard mag was the 20 round. The 30 round was a special order.But 20 and 30 round mags aren't large capacity. They are and always have been standard sizes
This claim has no basis in reality; the 30rd mag is standard for the M16A2 and they have no issue with "rough treatment".The reason the 30 round isn't offered as standard is that it puts more of a stress on the AR than it's designed to take when you have to handle it a little rough
You say this knowing fulll well it is false.But it appears that 15 seems to be the overall accepted minimum and meets the Heller Test that's pretty well been established.
In 1965 maybe. Now, whenever sold where such things are legal, they either have no mag, or a 30rd mag.The normal AR-15 comes with a 20 round mag.
Another claim you know you cannot supportAnd if you buy that 500 buck AR, it's not as rugged as the Military Grade.
Another claim you know you cannot supportThe 30 round mag puts extra stress on the gun when in a rough handled situation while the 20 doesn't so much.
Why do you make shit like this up?
That can happen with any firearm.You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders
I’m with you...
Why should someone involved in a mass killing have to reload?
Didn't watch the video did you ?
I’m with you brother
Why should someone have to stop killing just to reload?
Actually, if you analyze it, the problem is that people are killing. Why don't we regulate that? Oh yeah...
Every day, moron. Just look at Venezuela. Do you imagine Maduro would still be in power if the civilians were armed?When has our country ever needed a second amendment to defend our freedom?LolLolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessaryDid the Founding Fathers just write documents to free themselves from the British?
No.
They shot them. With guns.
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
Just the existence of the Second Amendment is needed... obviously
That can happen with any firearm.
I’m with you...
Why should someone involved in a mass killing have to reload?
Didn't watch the video did you ?
I’m with you brother
Why should someone have to stop killing just to reload?
Actually, if you analyze it, the problem is that people are killing. Why don't we regulate that? Oh yeah...
I am perfectly willing to regulate which people gain access to guns
That can happen with any firearm.
I’m with you...
Why should someone involved in a mass killing have to reload?
Didn't watch the video did you ?
I’m with you brother
Why should someone have to stop killing just to reload?
Actually, if you analyze it, the problem is that people are killing. Why don't we regulate that? Oh yeah...
I am perfectly willing to regulate which people gain access to guns
I love the term "military grade". The military often if not always buys from the low bidder. My Colt M4 Carbine/LE6920 (civilian version) is higher quality than what the military buys. It is "civilian grade". While the AR-15 is not used by the military, if used in an armed conflict then it officially becomes a "weapon of war", which is the other term the Left loves to harp on. Lol!
Since I fully believe in allowing people - such as yourself - who have no idea what they're talking about embarrass themselves as much as possible, I 'll give you the opportunity to prove for your claim that 30-rd magazines "put more of a stress on the AR than it's designed to take when you have to handle it a little rough".LOL, you can't win this one with insults....Another claim you know you cannot supportRead what you just typed. You used the M-16 as the weapon for the 30 round. I used the civilian AR-15 that isn't made nearly as well as the Military Grade M-16.Funny... all mine have come with 30s...When you purchased an AR-15, the standard mag was the 20 round. The 30 round was a special order.
This claim has no basis in reality; the 30rd mag is standard for the M16A2 and they have no issue with "rough treatment".The reason the 30 round isn't offered as standard is that it puts more of a stress on the AR than it's designed to take when you have to handle it a little rough
You say this knowing fulll well it is false.But it appears that 15 seems to be the overall accepted minimum and meets the Heller Test that's pretty well been established.
In 1965 maybe. Now, whenever sold where such things are legal, they either have no mag, or a 30rd mag.The normal AR-15 comes with a 20 round mag.
Another claim you know you cannot supportAnd if you buy that 500 buck AR, it's not as rugged as the Military Grade.
Another claim you know you cannot supportThe 30 round mag puts extra stress on the gun when in a rough handled situation while the 20 doesn't so much.
Why do you make shit like this up?
But, we know you won't, because you know you can't.
Let the avoidance begin... er... continue.
Every day, moron. Just look at Venezuela. Do you imagine Maduro would still be in power if the civilians were armed?When has our country ever needed a second amendment to defend our freedom?LolLolThey wrote a Constitution to make armed insurrection unnecessary
They made the first amendment more powerful than the second
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
Just the existence of the Second Amendment is needed... obviously
I am perfectly willing to regulate which people gain access to gunsI’m with you brotherDidn't watch the video did you ?I’m with you...
Why should someone involved in a mass killing have to reload?
Why should someone have to stop killing just to reload?
Actually, if you analyze it, the problem is that people are killing. Why don't we regulate that? Oh yeah...
That's not the issue. The issue is that murder is illegal and yet you repeatedly advocate shooting children. If we start regulating who an gain access to guns, we need to start with you.
You have yet to provide any reason for a 50 round magazine other than slaughtering school children
You need 50 rounds to hunt squirrels?
Only fools trust that the federal government has their best interests in mind...Every day, moron. Just look at Venezuela. Do you imagine Maduro would still be in power if the civilians were armed?When has our country ever needed a second amendment to defend our freedom?LolLol
The first amendment is powerless without the Second Amendment you fucking retard
Show me a case where the first amendment ever needed the second amendment for enforcement
The first amendment makes the second amendment unnecessary in defending our freedom
Just the existence of the Second Amendment is needed... obviously
<sob>. But....but....what about Venezuela?
This ain’t Venezuela Finger Boy
Since I fully believe in allowing people - such as yourself - who have no idea what they're talking about embarrass themselves as much as possible, I 'll give you the opportunity to prove for your claim that 30-rd magazines "put more of a stress on the AR than it's designed to take when you have to handle it a little rough".LOL, you can't win this one with insults....Another claim you know you cannot supportRead what you just typed. You used the M-16 as the weapon for the 30 round. I used the civilian AR-15 that isn't made nearly as well as the Military Grade M-16.Funny... all mine have come with 30s...
This claim has no basis in reality; the 30rd mag is standard for the M16A2 and they have no issue with "rough treatment".
You say this knowing fulll well it is false.
In 1965 maybe. Now, whenever sold where such things are legal, they either have no mag, or a 30rd mag.The normal AR-15 comes with a 20 round mag.
Another claim you know you cannot supportAnd if you buy that 500 buck AR, it's not as rugged as the Military Grade.
Another claim you know you cannot supportThe 30 round mag puts extra stress on the gun when in a rough handled situation while the 20 doesn't so much.
Why do you make shit like this up?
But, we know you won't, because you know you can't.
Let the avoidance begin... er... continue.
I don't have to prove a thing. I know by experience which is something you don't have. How about a few choruses of.....
