Permanent injunction against 10 round magazine ban? In California? Excellent....

[Flash]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

Read the opinion in the case. The judge said the ban violated Constitutional rights. That is why the ban was overturned.

 

[Flash]

 

[bripat9643]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

Private security is even worse, because you do not get to vote out their leaders if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt.
No, the law is that all able bodied are supposed to be members of the militia, according to the state constitutions, and they are supposed to then protect themselves, neighbors, municipalities, states, and the federal government, as needed.
The only way it can really work is if all people are involved in responsibly defending themselves as much as possible.
As soon as you pay people, it becomes increasingly corrupt.

You fire them if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt. Unlike the government, security companies have to compete with other security companies. If they are something to worry about, then why do corporations hire them all the time?

Most people don't want to be armed to the teeth to fight off thugs and invaders. That's why security companies exist.

 

[Rigby5]

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

Quite the opposite.
What is irrational is to believe that the orderly society we have now will last.
History shows it never does.
England for example, had a rebellion, civil war, or external invasion about every 300 years or so.
Similar is true with all societies.
The US likely has already become so corrupt it should already have been renewed somehow. For example, we murdered 3 million innocent Vietnamese, half a million Iraqis, etc., all based on obvious lies, without any legal repercussions. So we really have no legal system functioning any more. Instead we have the largest incarcerated population percentage in the world, with the illegal war on drugs.

What you see is a horribly corrupt government that you ignore and pretend is fine.
Face facts. The War on Drugs started in 1971 is totally and completely illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

Private security is even worse, because you do not get to vote out their leaders if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt.
No, the law is that all able bodied are supposed to be members of the militia, according to the state constitutions, and they are supposed to then protect themselves, neighbors, municipalities, states, and the federal government, as needed.
The only way it can really work is if all people are involved in responsibly defending themselves as much as possible.
As soon as you pay people, it becomes increasingly corrupt.

You fire them if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt. Unlike the government, security companies have to compete with other security companies. If they are something to worry about, then why do corporations hire them all the time?

Most people don't want to be armed to the teeth to fight off thugs and invaders. That's why security companies exist.

You being the ones that pay the private security, are the ones that WANT them to be corrupt. Their corruption will be shooting teens sneaking little things. And the teens and the rest of society can't fire them.

Sure most people do not want to deal with crime and that is why they instead hire others, but that is the point. They are wrong to hire others to do it, because that is what causes the deaths. If people instead were responsible and did not hire it out, then the deaths would greatly reduce. Security companies should not exist. They are left over from the aristocracy, and do not belong in a democratic republic.

 

[daveman]

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

You don't need your dick.

 

[bripat9643]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

Private security is even worse, because you do not get to vote out their leaders if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt.
No, the law is that all able bodied are supposed to be members of the militia, according to the state constitutions, and they are supposed to then protect themselves, neighbors, municipalities, states, and the federal government, as needed.
The only way it can really work is if all people are involved in responsibly defending themselves as much as possible.
As soon as you pay people, it becomes increasingly corrupt.

You fire them if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt. Unlike the government, security companies have to compete with other security companies. If they are something to worry about, then why do corporations hire them all the time?

Most people don't want to be armed to the teeth to fight off thugs and invaders. That's why security companies exist.

You being the ones that pay the private security, are the ones that WANT them to be corrupt. Their corruption will be shooting teens sneaking little things. And the teens and the rest of society can't fire them.

Sure most people do not want to deal with crime and that is why they instead hire others, but that is the point. They are wrong to hire others to do it, because that is what causes the deaths. If people instead were responsible and did not hire it out, then the deaths would greatly reduce. Security companies should not exist. They are left over from the aristocracy, and do not belong in a democratic republic.

You don't believe the rest of society can't make a private security company pay for murdering people?

Sorry, but I see no problem with hiring private security. Most of what they do is patrol the property. How many times have you heard about security people shooting anyone?

Your paranoia simply isn't justified.

 

[daveman]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

No. Why do you insist every gun owner is a potential criminal?

Why do you want law-abiding citizens unable to defend themselves?

 

[Flash]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

Private security is even worse, because you do not get to vote out their leaders if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt.
No, the law is that all able bodied are supposed to be members of the militia, according to the state constitutions, and they are supposed to then protect themselves, neighbors, municipalities, states, and the federal government, as needed.
The only way it can really work is if all people are involved in responsibly defending themselves as much as possible.
As soon as you pay people, it becomes increasingly corrupt.

You fire them if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt. Unlike the government, security companies have to compete with other security companies. If they are something to worry about, then why do corporations hire them all the time?

Most people don't want to be armed to the teeth to fight off thugs and invaders. That's why security companies exist.

You being the ones that pay the private security, are the ones that WANT them to be corrupt. Their corruption will be shooting teens sneaking little things. And the teens and the rest of society can't fire them.

Sure most people do not want to deal with crime and that is why they instead hire others, but that is the point. They are wrong to hire others to do it, because that is what causes the deaths. If people instead were responsible and did not hire it out, then the deaths would greatly reduce. Security companies should not exist. They are left over from the aristocracy, and do not belong in a democratic republic.

Most of the filthy mega rich Limousine Liberals that support Democrat politicians that run on a platform to do away with our Constitutional rights hire private security companies to protect their sorry asses.

They want to take away our right to protect ourselves and don't give a shit because they can afford to have somebody else protect them.

 

[miketx]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You don't believe the rest of society can't make a private security company pay for murdering people?

Sorry, but I see no problem with hiring private security. Most of what they do is patrol the property. How many times have you heard about security people shooting anyone?

Your paranoia simply isn't justified.

Private security people do not go around shooting anyone because the police are still there to punish them if they choose to do so.

If everything was controlled by private security then the people with the most money control everything.

If you lived next door to George Soros would you like to put your security firm up against his?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

nobody needs a high capacity magazine, they need to learn how to swap magazine quickly and efficiently.

you will spend far more time clearing jams than I will changing magazines.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

it will be easy to take, once it jams I will just use it to bitch slap you for being stupid enough to use a high capacity magazine

 

[miketx]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

it will be easy to take, once it jams I will just use it to bitch slap you for being stupid enough to use a high capacity magazine

Must something wrong with the 20 or so I have, they never jam. But I've noticed the more desperate you filthy scum get the more you just lie away. You are pathetic useless garbage.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

it will be easy to take, once it jams I will just use it to bitch slap you for being stupid enough to use a high capacity magazine

Must something wrong with the 20 or so I have, they never jam. But I've noticed the more desperate you filthy scum get the more you just lie away. You are pathetic useless garbage.

as I said to at the start, only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine.

why am I not surprised a Rambo wannbe like you would have a bunch. What a rube!

 

[Crepitus]

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

Quite the opposite.
What is irrational is to believe that the orderly society we have now will last.
History shows it never does.
England for example, had a rebellion, civil war, or external invasion about every 300 years or so.
Similar is true with all societies.
The US likely has already become so corrupt it should already have been renewed somehow. For example, we murdered 3 million innocent Vietnamese, half a million Iraqis, etc., all based on obvious lies, without any legal repercussions. So we really have no legal system functioning any more. Instead we have the largest incarcerated population percentage in the world, with the illegal war on drugs.

What you see is a horribly corrupt government that you ignore and pretend is fine.
Face facts. The War on Drugs started in 1971 is totally and completely illegal.

So you're planning a revolution?

All the more reason you don't need high capacity mags.

 

[miketx]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

Are you an asshole suggesting that my Constitutional rights be taken away because somebody else might do something illegal in the future? That is retarded Sir!

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

it will be easy to take, once it jams I will just use it to bitch slap you for being stupid enough to use a high capacity magazine

Must something wrong with the 20 or so I have, they never jam. But I've noticed the more desperate you filthy scum get the more you just lie away. You are pathetic useless garbage.

as I said to at the start, only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine.

why am I not surprised a Rambo wannbe like you would have a bunch. What a rube!

That's right lying troll, keep spewing. Military all over the world use large capacity magazines. Dont you care how stupid you look?

 

[miketx]

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

Quite the opposite.
What is irrational is to believe that the orderly society we have now will last.
History shows it never does.
England for example, had a rebellion, civil war, or external invasion about every 300 years or so.
Similar is true with all societies.
The US likely has already become so corrupt it should already have been renewed somehow. For example, we murdered 3 million innocent Vietnamese, half a million Iraqis, etc., all based on obvious lies, without any legal repercussions. So we really have no legal system functioning any more. Instead we have the largest incarcerated population percentage in the world, with the illegal war on drugs.

What you see is a horribly corrupt government that you ignore and pretend is fine.
Face facts. The War on Drugs started in 1971 is totally and completely illegal.

So you're planning a revolution?

All the more reason you don't need high capacity mags.

Come take them.

 

[Crepitus]

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

You don't need your dick.

Lol, maybe you don't need yours son, but I'm betting all the rest of us guys do.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You now have the liberty to shoot up a classroom full of first graders

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

Please, show me the constitutional right to high capacity magazines.

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

Lmao @ "need".

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

Delusions of grandeur.

the usual traitors and liars have spoken. Come take them.

it will be easy to take, once it jams I will just use it to bitch slap you for being stupid enough to use a high capacity magazine

Must something wrong with the 20 or so I have, they never jam. But I've noticed the more desperate you filthy scum get the more you just lie away. You are pathetic useless garbage.

as I said to at the start, only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine.

why am I not surprised a Rambo wannbe like you would have a bunch. What a rube!

That's right lying troll, keep spewing. Military all over the world use large capacity magazines. Dont you care how stupid you look?

Not the good ones!

But those Sandinistas sure looked bad ass with their big old magazines!

Let me guess, you never spent a day in the military,