HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
First, the number of members of the pertinent groups...then their view on homicide.
1. "US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin JANUARY 3, 2017
US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin
- 36% of Americans now conservative, 25% liberal
- Liberal figure has inched up from 17% in 1990s
- Conservatives mainly steady, while moderates decline
2. Since about 130 million votes were cast in the last presidential election ... More votes were cast in 2016 than in 2012 — but that doesn’t mean turnout was great
....that would translate to about 46.8 million conservatives.
How would you react if a poll of conservatives found that over 9 million of 'em were perfectly fine with killing......slaughtering......any who didn't agree with conservative viewpoints????
Have you ever heard such killings voiced or approved by conservatives?
3.That's a serious consideration, and it's evidence of the insanity of Democrats/Liberals. Here's why:
"When asked whether targeting and killing civilians can be justified to further a political, social or religious cause, 84% of U.S. Muslims say such tactics can rarely (8%) or never (76%) be justified, while 12% say such violence can sometimes (7%) or often (5%) be justified."
U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream
Soooooo......20% of American Muslims are peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em.
4. For specific context,
"... President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”
When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.
.... the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.
Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland."
Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth
5. Now...how does this amount to the insanity of Democrats/Liberals?
"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.
This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.
Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.
The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart
And Bill's wife wanted to increase this by 550%.
And they wonder why they lost the election.
From your link: "
Compared with general public, Muslims more likely to say targeting, killing civilians is never justifiable"
![]()
Also, when you follow the link in the article to a further explanation of some of the answers, you get this: "The new question finds that among the general public, Americans with a high school degree or less education are somewhat more likely than those with more education to say there are circumstances in which violence against civilians can be justified. In addition, Republicans and those who lean toward the GOP are more likely than Democrats to say such tactics are sometimes or often justifiable."
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism
If you're trying to use the responses by Muslims in that poll to paint them as murderous, you're doing a terrible job. Ditto Democrats. If anything, the poll apparently shows that those who lean Republican are the most likely to be "peachy keen with the murder of those who disagree with 'em."![]()
Neat, PoliticalChic built an army of strawmen to ignore your post.
Why is it that disagreement is never built on substance?
Are you simply too devoid of an intellect?
Are you afraid of the other Liberals?
Or.....is my OP so unassailable that all you are able to do is provided, as you have, hot air?
Join the conservative side: you're actually allowed to think over here.
Why don't you just go back to that post and actually reply to it.
You made no point.
I provided exactly the response it earned.
I asked this:
Why is it that disagreement is never built on substance?
Are you simply too devoid of an intellect?
Are you afraid of the other Liberals?
Or.....is my OP so unassailable that all you are able to do is provided, as you have, hot air?
See if you can understand this: by not being able to respond to those queries, you have the answer that all would expect from you.
You're dismissed.
I see, still can't handle the fact that the poll you used so glaringly does not prove the point you were trying to make. That's on you to deal with and you're doing an astoundingly poor job of it.