Petition to BAN any discussion of Child Porn

[Iron Head]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

 

[westwall]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

 

[Iron Head]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

 

[boedicca]

I do not support such a rule change. If some public figure is arrested for child porn, we certainly should be able to discuss that...for example.

Zero Tolerance Rules generally backfire.

 

[Iron Head]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

BTW, you don't have to use HUGE red typeface when responding, like you are God or something. That is really obnoxious.

 

[Iron Head]

I don't care how great of an institution you may have. Failure to implement and enforce standards will allow for said institution to eventually be undermined and destroyed under the right circumstances.

WAKE UP!

 

[Iron Head]

If you have freedom and follow it to what you believe to be its rational limits, then you get shit like this that we have here today.

There is no state of absolute freedom. Further, at some point this "freedom" prevents others, the majority, from exercising their freedom to be out of the presence of scum bags.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

If you have freedom and follow it to what you believe to be its rational limits, then you get shit like this that we have here today.

There is no state of absolute freedom. Further, at some point this "freedom" prevents others, the majority, from exercising their freedom to be out of the presence of scum bags.

Who is forcing you to open and read threads?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[westwall]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

 

[westwall]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

BTW, you don't have to use HUGE red typeface when responding, like you are God or something. That is really obnoxious.

Yes. I MUST use HUGE type to reinforce my GODLIKE POWER!

 

[Iron Head]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

 

[flacaltenn]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Don't think we even have the charter to DETERMINE illegal behaviour. That's a matter for authorities. UNLESS --- it tends to blatant advocacy... Say like -- if a poster was advocating for exposing young children to porn.
That crosses my line and I wouldn't want to be part of an org that permitted that.

IMO -- the best way to handle this is to allow other members to push back. To not have ANY "special protections" for that kind of speech.. To that end -- I wish we would didn't edit this thread as heavily as it seems to have been. But that's a matter of discretion in moderation..

We don't "protect" skinheads, racists, or child abusers from rightful scorn and derision as long as it's done by attention to rules for BOTH sides..

We HAVE TO remove some material that would jeopardize the operation of this board. INCLUDING any material that would make us subject to seizure or search. Such as a plan for an assassination or other crime.

 

[flacaltenn]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

That is done so that others on the staff can quickly scan a thread and see what actions have been taken.
That's why we ask members to avoid using bright red font.

 

[Unkotare]

... who's with me?

What is there to discuss? It's disgusting, wrong, damaging, illegal, etc.

Should be a "bannable" topic....

Definitely. Herbert would finally leave.

 

[Iron Head]

If you have freedom and follow it to what you believe to be its rational limits, then you get shit like this that we have here today.

There is no state of absolute freedom. Further, at some point this "freedom" prevents others, the majority, from exercising their freedom to be out of the presence of scum bags.

Who is forcing you to open and read threads?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is offensive, yes. It is also a cancer on humanity that ought to be shamed, shunned, and forced into the dark recesses of human existence so that any perp knows that if he sticks his head out of the shadows it will be smashed.

You are not, unfortunately, going to eradicate these vermin. Their infliction is a psychological malfunction. The only way to deal with them is by execution, inprisonment or castration. We have to minimize this shit to the best of our ability. The way to do this is not to "bring it out in the open and talk about it". That is fucking asinine. That enables this kind of shit to exist in the open, thereby fostering it. Rather, you need to put the screws to these fuckers and condemn them at every turn.

Luddy, you just don't get it. You are an incurable leftist moron, but I love you for it, dude. Have a great weekend, buddy!

 

[Iron Head]

I think that we all know who it is that we would like to see banned. However, if we name that person then we are the person who gets banned for posting "call out" threads. How ass backwards is this?

It may be tricky to change to content rules, but certainly doable, as normal people do not talk about this shit, ever, unless it is in some response to a news story about someone being arrested and charged for doing it.

Moreover, it is not even an issue of free speech. First off, this sort of material is not protected. Moreover, there is no state action here. This is a private board and it can admit and dismiss anyone it likes so long as it does not make those decisions based upon race or gender and the decisions are consistent with the user agreement.

I don't see what the problem is. There will be no slippery slope thing. The offensive topic here is so far worse than the next closest disgusting topic that the slippery slope analysis is inapplicable.

I know that the mods must be as disgusted by this going on here as are the rest of us. You cannot just sit there and do nothing, can you?

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

That is done so that others on the staff can quickly scan a thread and see what actions have been taken.
That's why we ask members to avoid using bright red font.

I will accept what you say, though it does seem like a big power trip thing.

How can I become one of you mods?

 

[westwall]

We monitor the threads. We don't interfere unless a rule is broken. This board was set up to be as free of interference as possible. ALL ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK HERE. However, advocating for illegal behavior in any way is against board rules and will be dealt with accordingly. The fact that certain members here are considered perverts (either correctly or not) is immaterial so long as they follow the rules.

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

That is done so that others on the staff can quickly scan a thread and see what actions have been taken.
That's why we ask members to avoid using bright red font.

I will accept what you say, though it does seem like a big power trip thing.

How can I become one of you mods?

You have to deposit a million bucks to each of our Swiss bank accounts.

 

[Iron Head]

I guess we can start posting recipes for cannibals too? I mean, if some of us like that sort of thing and just happen to "find" the ingredients laying around, then it is not illegal.

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

That is done so that others on the staff can quickly scan a thread and see what actions have been taken.
That's why we ask members to avoid using bright red font.

I will accept what you say, though it does seem like a big power trip thing.

How can I become one of you mods?

You have to deposit a million bucks to each of our Swiss bank accounts.

How about a hand job instead?

 

[westwall]

If you have freedom and follow it to what you believe to be its rational limits, then you get shit like this that we have here today.

There is no state of absolute freedom. Further, at some point this "freedom" prevents others, the majority, from exercising their freedom to be out of the presence of scum bags.

Who is forcing you to open and read threads?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is offensive, yes. It is also a cancer on humanity that ought to be shamed, shunned, and forced into the dark recesses of human existence so that any perp knows that if he sticks his head out of the shadows it will be smashed.

You are not, unfortunately, going to eradicate these vermin. Their infliction is a psychological malfunction. The only way to deal with them is by execution, inprisonment or castration. We have to minimize this shit to the best of our ability. The way to do this is not to "bring it out in the open and talk about it". That is fucking asinine. That enables this kind of shit to exist in the open, thereby fostering it. Rather, you need to put the screws to these fuckers and condemn them at every turn.

Luddy, you just don't get it. You are an incurable leftist moron, but I love you for it, dude. Have a great weekend, buddy!

Killing them will certainly work on those that are caught, but will have no effect on the others. For most I don't believe it is psychological, I believe it to be a hard wiring of their brain problem that's why the recidivism rate is 100%. Castration likewise won't work as they'll figure out some other way to "love" the children. That leaves imprisonment.

I am OK with a form of lifetime imprisonment where they live on an island and do all the normal things you do in life, there is just no contact with children and they don't leave the island...ever.

 

[westwall]

I believe that would constitute advocacy for illegal behavior....No?

Way to side step that question!

That is done so that others on the staff can quickly scan a thread and see what actions have been taken.
That's why we ask members to avoid using bright red font.

I will accept what you say, though it does seem like a big power trip thing.

How can I become one of you mods?

You have to deposit a million bucks to each of our Swiss bank accounts.

How about a hand job instead?

I prefer my wife's attentions...thanks...