Petraeus: Hillary would make a "tremendous president"; praises handling...

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Nov 10, 2011
32,256
12,983
1,600
Colorado
...of Benghazi.

Keep in mind this is a republican.

"She'd make a tremendous president," Petraeus says in the new book "HRC" by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.
And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.
"Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times," Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. "In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled."

Keep in mind this guy didn't work in the State Department. He was head of the CIA during the time of the attacks. There is no reason he would not be candid about her. Not only that, but the two had a rough history going back to the controversy of the Iraq war.

Petraeus's glowing assessment is especially interesting given his uneasy history with Hillary Clinton. She essentially accused Petraeus of lying about progress in Iraq when he was President Bush's commander there and she was a senator preparing to run for president.

http://gma.yahoo.com/did-petraeus-just-endorse-hillary-clinton-203957582--abc-news-topstories.html
 
ok, keep in mind...So what?

:rolleyes:

what's he going to say, she'd be a shitty President

now that I'd pay to see...lol
 
...of Benghazi.

Keep in mind this is a republican.

"She'd make a tremendous president," Petraeus says in the new book "HRC" by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.
And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.
"Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times," Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. "In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled."

Keep in mind this guy didn't work in the State Department. He was head of the CIA during the time of the attacks. There is no reason he would not be candid about her. Not only that, but the two had a rough history going back to the controversy of the Iraq war.

Petraeus's glowing assessment is especially interesting given his uneasy history with Hillary Clinton. She essentially accused Petraeus of lying about progress in Iraq when he was President Bush's commander there and she was a senator preparing to run for president.

Did Petraeus Just Endorse Hillary Clinton? - Yahoo

Link to Petraeus being a Republican?
 
LOL...what exactly did Hilary "handle well" in regards to Benghazi? She ignored the danger to our personnel and then took part in an attempt to cover up what happened for political reasons, lying to the American people and even worse the families of the slain men.
 
LOL...what exactly did Hilary "handle well" in regards to Benghazi? She ignored the danger to our personnel and then took part in an attempt to cover up what happened for political reasons, lying to the American people and even worse the families of the slain men.

Reviewing the tired Fox News/Republican talking points does none of us any good.
 
Keep in mind this is the same man the left called a traitor, war criminal, and referred to as General Betray us in a full page New York Times ad he is welcome to his opinion I respect it but don't agree with it I find it somewhat ironic some on the left now suddenly think so highly of him when not so long ago they thought very little of him.
 
So you think american voters after electing a cluless ##### tahat has cost us trillions of $$$$$$$ will now elect a clueless old hag bimbo??? God help america!!!
 
People still respect him, even with his infidelity, so Hillary getting a endorsement from him can only help if she's actually going to run.
 
Neither does sticking your head in the sand in regards to what happened in Benghazi. It was a clusterfuck of epic proportions and Hillary was in charge. When the shit hit the fan she went along with the made up story that the attack was simply a protest over a video that escalated. Those aren't "talking points"...those things are what took place.

What we're seeing now is the beginnings of an attempt by the liberal media to "fix" Hillary Clinton's Benghazi problem. Trust me, it's going to get worse...
 
...of Benghazi.

Keep in mind this is a republican.

"She'd make a tremendous president," Petraeus says in the new book "HRC" by Jonathan Allen and Aimee Parnes.
And for Petraeus, Exhibit A in why she would be a tremendous president is the very thing for which Republicans most aggressively attack Clinton: her performance as Secretary of State when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked.
"Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times," Petraeus tells Allen and Parnes. "In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled."

Keep in mind this guy didn't work in the State Department. He was head of the CIA during the time of the attacks. There is no reason he would not be candid about her. Not only that, but the two had a rough history going back to the controversy of the Iraq war.

Petraeus's glowing assessment is especially interesting given his uneasy history with Hillary Clinton. She essentially accused Petraeus of lying about progress in Iraq when he was President Bush's commander there and she was a senator preparing to run for president.

Did Petraeus Just Endorse Hillary Clinton? - Yahoo

The General was inhaling pussy at the time.
 
Book Review: 'HRC' by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes - WSJ.com

This review by an abc reporter characterized it as a puff piece with very little new. I have to admit the petraeus thing is surprising, especially since the general and the pres seemed to have such a difference of opinion over Afghanistan. I don't know if it is true or not but that is probably the point.

But the infidelity team might make a potent presidential pair, and that may be the point of floating this trial balloon or she may be co- opting the competition.
 
Neither does sticking your head in the sand in regards to what happened in Benghazi. It was a clusterfuck of epic proportions and Hillary was in charge. When the shit hit the fan she went along with the made up story that the attack was simply a protest over a video that escalated. Those aren't "talking points"...those things are what took place.

What we're seeing now is the beginnings of an attempt by the liberal media to "fix" Hillary Clinton's Benghazi problem. Trust me, it's going to get worse...

The only people who believe or give a shit about Hillary with regard to Benghazi are those that hate her anyway. Everybody else couldn't give two shits...
 

Forum List

Back
Top