WillReadmore
Gold Member
- Nov 25, 2013
- 1,330
- 110
More than two will live there. They will get (and need) security, which will take space.The point, Sherlock, is that leftist elites in government are constantly saying one thing and doing another. It isn't energy efficient to warm up two assholes with a 8,000 sf heating system. You need pictures?heating and cooling over 8000 square feet for 4 people is extremely energy intensive especially when you consider the average home is only about 2600 sfWhen the Doomsdayers start acting like manmade global warming is a crisis, I may start listening.
Obamas' new $5.3m Washington DC home renovated to include TWO offices | Daily Mail Online
"non-eco friendly"? Where does it say that?
How many posts do we get from people like you where they put a truth with something they just decided to add that has nothing to do with what has been said, and then you attack the thing that wasn't said.
Sure, that doesn't mean that the Obamas are going to heat 8000 square meters all the time. It doesn't mean they don't have energy efficient heating. It doesn't mean anything, it means their house is big and that's all it means. And yet someone decided to put in that it wasn't energy efficient with no evidence of this at all.
They both need offices, as they are both professionals in their own right. Were they to rent offices outside the home it would explode the costs for heat, security, transportation, etc.
And, they've indicated that it is a temporary residence.
Your envy is noted, though. Had you got an education, maybe you could have succeeded, too!
For the last 24 years, the US first lady has had a post graduate degree.
So much for THAT, eh?