Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Instead, we let 90 million or so illegals come across the border over the same time span, yes?Very trueThe point that the 90 million or so children that have been killed would have been a part of our civilization had they not been killed, went right over your head.Not necessarilythey won, civilization lost......Planned Parenthood fought the fight
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
And their parents realized that they were incapable of supporting those children within our civilization
So the next question is whether our civilization was prepared to step up and care for those 90 million children
Anyone who has heard the rhetoric out of conservatives for the last 45 years realizes we aren't
Young families don't have to feed or care for those illegals, but they can choose abortionInstead, we let 90 million or so illegals come across the border over the same time span, yes?Very trueThe point that the 90 million or so children that have been killed would have been a part of our civilization had they not been killed, went right over your head.Not necessarilythey won, civilization lost......Planned Parenthood fought the fight
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
And their parents realized that they were incapable of supporting those children within our civilization
So the next question is whether our civilization was prepared to step up and care for those 90 million children
Anyone who has heard the rhetoric out of conservatives for the last 45 years realizes we aren't
FYI this country can easily support a billion people.. so long as those people "work" for a living.
Is there a particular reason democrats believe the amount of work in this country that can be performed, is a fixed amount?
We already support these children. Are you daft?Young families don't have to feed or care for those illegals, but they can choose abortionInstead, we let 90 million or so illegals come across the border over the same time span, yes?Very trueThe point that the 90 million or so children that have been killed would have been a part of our civilization had they not been killed, went right over your head.Not necessarilythey won, civilization lost......
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
And their parents realized that they were incapable of supporting those children within our civilization
So the next question is whether our civilization was prepared to step up and care for those 90 million children
Anyone who has heard the rhetoric out of conservatives for the last 45 years realizes we aren't
FYI this country can easily support a billion people.. so long as those people "work" for a living.
Is there a particular reason democrats believe the amount of work in this country that can be performed, is a fixed amount?
If you are willing to pay for the support of an additional 90 million children, I would like to see the legislation supporting that. All I have seen from the right is attempts to slash existing funding
You support aborted children?We already support these children. Are you daft?Young families don't have to feed or care for those illegals, but they can choose abortionInstead, we let 90 million or so illegals come across the border over the same time span, yes?Very trueThe point that the 90 million or so children that have been killed would have been a part of our civilization had they not been killed, went right over your head.Not necessarily
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
And their parents realized that they were incapable of supporting those children within our civilization
So the next question is whether our civilization was prepared to step up and care for those 90 million children
Anyone who has heard the rhetoric out of conservatives for the last 45 years realizes we aren't
FYI this country can easily support a billion people.. so long as those people "work" for a living.
Is there a particular reason democrats believe the amount of work in this country that can be performed, is a fixed amount?
If you are willing to pay for the support of an additional 90 million children, I would like to see the legislation supporting that. All I have seen from the right is attempts to slash existing funding
No moron. I support the kids that survived the killing blows from you and your allies.You support aborted children?We already support these children. Are you daft?Young families don't have to feed or care for those illegals, but they can choose abortionInstead, we let 90 million or so illegals come across the border over the same time span, yes?Very trueThe point that the 90 million or so children that have been killed would have been a part of our civilization had they not been killed, went right over your head.
And their parents realized that they were incapable of supporting those children within our civilization
So the next question is whether our civilization was prepared to step up and care for those 90 million children
Anyone who has heard the rhetoric out of conservatives for the last 45 years realizes we aren't
FYI this country can easily support a billion people.. so long as those people "work" for a living.
Is there a particular reason democrats believe the amount of work in this country that can be performed, is a fixed amount?
If you are willing to pay for the support of an additional 90 million children, I would like to see the legislation supporting that. All I have seen from the right is attempts to slash existing funding
Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.We get to decide the consequences of people's choices.Who cares? Women have the right to abortion. You don't get to make their choices for them.
There is no right to abortion.
Consequences? Like WHAT?
If YOU want a woman's uterus to become property of the state, then YOU have to accept THOSE consequences.
A pregnancy requires special care and services for a woman. Are YOU willing to PAY for her prenatal care? Are you willing to PAY for her numerous doctor visits, tests, vitamins and ultrsound? Are YOU willing to PAY for her special diet and make sure she eats healthy? Are YOU willing to make sure she doesn't smoke or drink to protect the health of the embryo?
Are you willing to PAY her prenatal care and delivery costs which can range from about $9,000 to over $250,000?
Are YOU willing to PAY for her maturity leave from her job?
What if the woman has medical complications that leave her permanently disabled? Are YOU willing to PAY to support her the rest of her life?
Consequences? I really don't believe you even thought about consequences.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.We get to decide the consequences of people's choices.Who cares? Women have the right to abortion. You don't get to make their choices for them.
There is no right to abortion.
Consequences? Like WHAT?
If YOU want a woman's uterus to become property of the state, then YOU have to accept THOSE consequences.
A pregnancy requires special care and services for a woman. Are YOU willing to PAY for her prenatal care? Are you willing to PAY for her numerous doctor visits, tests, vitamins and ultrsound? Are YOU willing to PAY for her special diet and make sure she eats healthy? Are YOU willing to make sure she doesn't smoke or drink to protect the health of the embryo?
Are you willing to PAY her prenatal care and delivery costs which can range from about $9,000 to over $250,000?
Are YOU willing to PAY for her maturity leave from her job?
What if the woman has medical complications that leave her permanently disabled? Are YOU willing to PAY to support her the rest of her life?
Consequences? I really don't believe you even thought about consequences.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
It is not murder anywhere in the world.Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.We get to decide the consequences of people's choices.Who cares? Women have the right to abortion. You don't get to make their choices for them.
There is no right to abortion.
Consequences? Like WHAT?
If YOU want a woman's uterus to become property of the state, then YOU have to accept THOSE consequences.
A pregnancy requires special care and services for a woman. Are YOU willing to PAY for her prenatal care? Are you willing to PAY for her numerous doctor visits, tests, vitamins and ultrsound? Are YOU willing to PAY for her special diet and make sure she eats healthy? Are YOU willing to make sure she doesn't smoke or drink to protect the health of the embryo?
Are you willing to PAY her prenatal care and delivery costs which can range from about $9,000 to over $250,000?
Are YOU willing to PAY for her maturity leave from her job?
What if the woman has medical complications that leave her permanently disabled? Are YOU willing to PAY to support her the rest of her life?
Consequences? I really don't believe you even thought about consequences.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
Keep telling yourself that, creep.It is not murder anywhere in the world.Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.We get to decide the consequences of people's choices.
There is no right to abortion.
Consequences? Like WHAT?
If YOU want a woman's uterus to become property of the state, then YOU have to accept THOSE consequences.
A pregnancy requires special care and services for a woman. Are YOU willing to PAY for her prenatal care? Are you willing to PAY for her numerous doctor visits, tests, vitamins and ultrsound? Are YOU willing to PAY for her special diet and make sure she eats healthy? Are YOU willing to make sure she doesn't smoke or drink to protect the health of the embryo?
Are you willing to PAY her prenatal care and delivery costs which can range from about $9,000 to over $250,000?
Are YOU willing to PAY for her maturity leave from her job?
What if the woman has medical complications that leave her permanently disabled? Are YOU willing to PAY to support her the rest of her life?
Consequences? I really don't believe you even thought about consequences.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
I don't have to.Keep telling yourself that, creep.It is not murder anywhere in the world.Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.Consequences? Like WHAT?
If YOU want a woman's uterus to become property of the state, then YOU have to accept THOSE consequences.
A pregnancy requires special care and services for a woman. Are YOU willing to PAY for her prenatal care? Are you willing to PAY for her numerous doctor visits, tests, vitamins and ultrsound? Are YOU willing to PAY for her special diet and make sure she eats healthy? Are YOU willing to make sure she doesn't smoke or drink to protect the health of the embryo?
Are you willing to PAY her prenatal care and delivery costs which can range from about $9,000 to over $250,000?
Are YOU willing to PAY for her maturity leave from her job?
What if the woman has medical complications that leave her permanently disabled? Are YOU willing to PAY to support her the rest of her life?
Consequences? I really don't believe you even thought about consequences.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
no dimwit....she became pregnant because she stopped abstaining.....how fucking stupid ARE you......She became pregnant because abstinence failed.I hate it when I have to point out the obvious but if the woman is pregnant she didn't practice abstinence........failure is not success.....losing a baseball game is not winning.....to the contrary.....every single person who has practiced abstinence has avoided an unwanted pregnancy.......does PP have a better track record than 100%?........Planned Parenthood is the leading proponent of responsible parenting. You should only have the children you want and can afford to support
As such, Planned parenthood has been at the forefront of sex education and open access to birth control for all
Conservative policies of abstenance, bans and shaming of pregnant women have done little in comparison
To the contrary
EVERY unwanted pregnancy is a failure of abstenence
RW is an authoritarian. Freedom of choice is a completely alien concept to him.no......she obviously stopped abstaining........abstaining didn't fail.......And abstaining ultimately failed didn't it?no dimwit....she became pregnant because she stopped abstaining.....how fucking stupid ARE you......She became pregnant because abstinence failed.I hate it when I have to point out the obvious but if the woman is pregnant she didn't practice abstinence........failure is not success.....losing a baseball game is not winning.....
A person that is sleeping doesn't have a will of its own, because that would require conscious and unconscious reasoning. In that case, you could then ask the sleeping person if it wants to remain in a life of abuse and poverty. So it should be legal to kill people who are in poverty or abuse while they are sleeping, right?and I am going to defend mine by pointing out that unborn children should not be killed against theirs.........typical....you have no moral standing to support the 99% of unborn child killings that don't involve rape or incest, so you only talk about the 1%.....fine, I waive any objection to abortions in the case of rape or incest.......now how are you going to defend your position?.......Rape and incest are also an inconvenience. (eye roll)
In a perfect world, no one would get pregnant until its planned. Do we live in a perfect world?
I'm going to defend my position by saying the Supreme Court made the right decision, and women should not have to give birth against their will.
A zygote/fetus doesn't have a will of its own, because that would require conscious and unconscious reasoning. In that case, you could then ask the fetus if it wants to be born into a life of abuse and poverty.
would you rather have died than experienced the abuse you suffered as a child?......and I am going to defend mine by pointing out that unborn children should not be killed against theirs.........typical....you have no moral standing to support the 99% of unborn child killings that don't involve rape or incest, so you only talk about the 1%.....fine, I waive any objection to abortions in the case of rape or incest.......now how are you going to defend your position?.......really?....we aren't the ones who want to kill because they are inconvenienced.....
Rape and incest are also an inconvenience. (eye roll)
In a perfect world, no one would get pregnant until its planned. Do we live in a perfect world?
I'm going to defend my position by saying the Supreme Court made the right decision, and women should not have to give birth against their will.
A zygote/fetus doesn't have a will of its own, because that would require conscious and unconscious reasoning. In that case, you could then ask the fetus if it wants to be born into a life of abuse and poverty. (sarcasm)
omigorsh, I was right.......you really ARE a fucking idiot.........oh lord, don't be an idiot......that didn't change because of planned parenthood, that changed because we moved from an agricultural to an industrial society.......Not necessarilythey won, civilization lost......Planned Parenthood fought the fight
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
Are you serious?
Do you think women in cities did not get pregnant? They were not abstaining you know
so your point isn't that its not murder.....your point is it isn't prosecuted......I don't have to.Keep telling yourself that, creep.It is not murder anywhere in the world.Murdering the baby shouldn't be a choice in the first place. You are morally bankrupt.Always the answer from liberals. Make somebody ELSE pay for your irresponsibility. I guess it also must be my fault that people go to jail for armed robbery because I'm not willing to send them a check every week so they don't have to work.
A woman who makes her own personal choice is taking personal responsibility for HER OWN life. YOU want to DICTATE what that choice is, so now YOU are taking responsibility for what follows.
Abortion is not prosecuted as murder
and only a bloodthirsty barbarian would promote the killing of unborn children as a form of birth control........Only a nutty religious extremist would push abstinence as a form of birth control.
omigorsh, I was right.......you really ARE a fucking idiot.........oh lord, don't be an idiot......that didn't change because of planned parenthood, that changed because we moved from an agricultural to an industrial society.......Not necessarilythey won, civilization lost......Planned Parenthood fought the fight
Prior to planned parenthood, women in our society would have 10-12 children in their lifetime
Now it is down to 2-3
Planned Parenthood wants families to be able to control how many children they can afford
Are you serious?
Do you think women in cities did not get pregnant? They were not abstaining you know
