deltex1
Gold Member
Adoption by a loving family, you goddam fool.So what? What's the upside of forcing a teenage girl, who accidentally gets pregnant, to have a baby?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adoption by a loving family, you goddam fool.So what? What's the upside of forcing a teenage girl, who accidentally gets pregnant, to have a baby?
Adoption by a loving family, you goddam fool.So what? What's the upside of forcing a teenage girl, who accidentally gets pregnant, to have a baby?
Yeah because we don't have enough kids waiting to be adopted in this country. Solid "logic".
why don't wingers understand that murder is a term legally defined by statute.
abortion is not included in that definition and is LEGAL and CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED.
If you don't want one. don't have one. it's your CHOICE.
now isn't that easy?
seems pretty simple, but still waiting for the GOP to grasp it, so go figure.![]()
Yeah because we don't have enough kids waiting to be adopted in this country. Solid "logic".
You communists only lie when you say, write, or type something.
{
When Mitch and Susan Glavas began the domestic adoption process in 2010, there was one expense they weren't anticipating: the marketing budget.
The couple's adoption agency initially suggested that they build a website to introduce themselves to birth parents. But they hesitated -- until an expected six- to 12-month wait for a baby grew longer and longer.
Now 21 months into the process, the Glavas' website (www.glavasadopt.com) is part of a broader online effort to connect with birth families that includes Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, a blog and Internet advertising. "A longer wait requires more resources," says Susan, 44, a manager for her family's tech support business in Orange County, California.
}
Longer wait times, higher costs for U.S. adoptions
There is a reason people turn to China and Africa to adopt, and it isn't because there are so many babies waiting to be adopted, Comrade.
is there anything the pandering Left cant lie and distort?
if one finds themselves needing or wanting an abortion they werent planning anything, especially parenthood.
oh and safe sex wasnt practiced either.
Adoption by a loving family, you goddam fool.So what? What's the upside of forcing a teenage girl, who accidentally gets pregnant, to have a baby?
Yeah because we don't have enough kids waiting to be adopted in this country. Solid "logic".
You communists only lie when you say, write, or type something.
{
When Mitch and Susan Glavas began the domestic adoption process in 2010, there was one expense they weren't anticipating: the marketing budget.
The couple's adoption agency initially suggested that they build a website to introduce themselves to birth parents. But they hesitated -- until an expected six- to 12-month wait for a baby grew longer and longer.
Now 21 months into the process, the Glavas' website (www.glavasadopt.com) is part of a broader online effort to connect with birth families that includes Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, a blog and Internet advertising. "A longer wait requires more resources," says Susan, 44, a manager for her family's tech support business in Orange County, California.
}
Longer wait times, higher costs for U.S. adoptions
There is a reason people turn to China and Africa to adopt, and it isn't because there are so many babies waiting to be adopted, Comrade.
Did you have an actual point? Because your rambling doesn't counteract what I said.
"Each year more than 20,000 children age out of the foster care without being adopted. Today there are 102,000 children in foster care waiting to be adopted ranging in age from less than a year old to 21."
Meet the Children - AdoptUSKids
why don't wingers understand that murder is a term legally defined by statute.
abortion is not included in that definition and is LEGAL and CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED.
If you don't want one. don't have one. it's your CHOICE.
now isn't that easy?
seems pretty simple, but still waiting for the GOP to grasp it, so go figure.![]()
you don't have to wait on anyone. You pro-choicers go abort off all your children, you are right it is your sick choice. BUT taxpayers don't want to PAY FOR IT. So grasp on that one
Yeah because we don't have enough kids waiting to be adopted in this country. Solid "logic".
You communists only lie when you say, write, or type something.
{
When Mitch and Susan Glavas began the domestic adoption process in 2010, there was one expense they weren't anticipating: the marketing budget.
The couple's adoption agency initially suggested that they build a website to introduce themselves to birth parents. But they hesitated -- until an expected six- to 12-month wait for a baby grew longer and longer.
Now 21 months into the process, the Glavas' website (www.glavasadopt.com) is part of a broader online effort to connect with birth families that includes Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, a blog and Internet advertising. "A longer wait requires more resources," says Susan, 44, a manager for her family's tech support business in Orange County, California.
}
Longer wait times, higher costs for U.S. adoptions
There is a reason people turn to China and Africa to adopt, and it isn't because there are so many babies waiting to be adopted, Comrade.
Did you have an actual point? Because your rambling doesn't counteract what I said.
"Each year more than 20,000 children age out of the foster care without being adopted. Today there are 102,000 children in foster care waiting to be adopted ranging in age from less than a year old to 21."
Meet the Children - AdoptUSKids
They are saying that denying a teenage girl the morning after pill and forcing her to term so some strangers can have her baby is a better outcome than letting her choose the termination.
It's a sickness with these people.
half a bil to do the right thing for women is a real budget breaker...
Did you have an actual point?
Because your rambling doesn't counteract what I said.
"Each year more than 20,000 children age out of the foster care without being adopted. Today there are 102,000 children in foster care waiting to be adopted ranging in age from less than a year old to 21."
Meet the Children - AdoptUSKids
It's straight up selfishness and lack of empathy. We all know the tune would change the second they are forced in to the situation though and it impacts them directly.
Did you have an actual point?
Yes, that you are lying when you claim that babies are waiting to be adopted in America,
Because your rambling doesn't counteract what I said.
Other than demonstrating that you're lying about this.
"Each year more than 20,000 children age out of the foster care without being adopted. Today there are 102,000 children in foster care waiting to be adopted ranging in age from less than a year old to 21."
Meet the Children - AdoptUSKids
Since you Communist have yet to get abortion of 15 year olds legalized by SCOTUS, this is entirely irrelevant. Abortion targets infants, not children removed from homes at later ages.
It's straight up selfishness and lack of empathy. We all know the tune would change the second they are forced in to the situation though and it impacts them directly.
So what you're saying is that if you truly empathize with someone, you'll kill them?
Communist logic in action.....
[
Do you know how I know you don't understand the definition of the word "infant"?
And as I've stated and proven, we have plenty of kids waiting to be adopted. When are you going to step up and adopt a few big mouth?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Explains Pol Pot and Joe Stalin.![]()
[
Do you know how I know you don't understand the definition of the word "infant"?
And as I've stated and proven, we have plenty of kids waiting to be adopted. When are you going to step up and adopt a few big mouth?
You claimed that killing infants is good because we have kids waiting to be adopted.
Again, older children removed from homes have utterly zero impact on the question of abortion.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Explains Pol Pot and Joe Stalin.![]()