Political Cartoon

[Rigby5]

View attachment 629356

Biden's war on the NRA is totally illegal.
Doesn't what anyone thinks about guns, the constitution clearly forbids any federal jurisdiction over them.
States can do what they want.
But the feds are not supposed to do anything.

 

[two_iron]

 

[two_iron]

 

[two_iron]

 

[two_iron]

 

[two_iron]

 

[miketx]

View attachment 629391

Maybe some hope for her...

 

[Desperado]

 

[Desperado]

 

[Desperado]

 

[lg325]

 

[miketx]

 

[miketx]

LMAO.....All that matters is the child is born....after that its whatevs

That's right, have the child and abandon it. The leftist way. Let's go disneys!

 

[miketx]

View attachment 629387

 

[progressive hunter]

Biden's war on the NRA is totally illegal.
Doesn't what anyone thinks about guns, the constitution clearly forbids any federal jurisdiction over them.
States can do what they want.
But the feds are not supposed to do anything.

wrong,, the 2nd A applies to all jurisdictions just like all the other amendments,,

unless youre saying the 5th can be changed by the states and people executed without due process or trial??

is that what youre saying??

 

[Stryder50]

 

[Rigby5]

That's right, have the child and abandon it. The leftist way. Let's go disneys!

Humans evolved from other primates.
All primates are not monogamous, and the whole tribe takes care of them.
It is fairly difficult, if not impossible, to take care of children and also get a job to pay the rent and for food.
So the system is totally and completely wrong and impractical.
It can't work and is not how humans are supposed to live.

 

[Desperado]

Humans evolved from other primates.
All primates are not monogamous, and the whole tribe takes care of them.
It is fairly difficult, if not impossible, to take care of children and also get a job to pay the rent and for food.
So the system is totally and completely wrong and impractical.
It can't work and is not how humans are supposed to live.

It wasn;t always this way. The system changed in the early 50's when both spouses had to find jobs to meet the mortgage payment. This I blame on the bankers.

 

[Rigby5]

wrong,, the 2nd A applies to all jurisdictions just like all the other amendments,,

unless youre saying the 5th can be changed by the states and people executed without due process or trial??

is that what youre saying??

{... A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ...}

Since "Militia" is capitalized, it implies the called-up, citizen-soldier, national army.
The "right of the people" is plural, so is not clear to imply individuals?

But here is the wiki background.
{...
The United States Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Proposed following the often bitter 1787–88 debate over the ratification of the Constitution and written to address the objections raised by Anti-Federalists, the Bill of Rights amendments add to the Constitution specific guarantees of personal freedoms and rights, clear limitations on the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and explicit declarations that all powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states or the people. The concepts codified in these amendments are built upon those in earlier documents, especially the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), as well as the Northwest Ordinance (1787),[1] the English Bill of Rights (1689), and Magna Carta (1215).[2]

Due largely to the efforts of Representative James Madison, who studied the deficiencies of the Constitution pointed out by anti-federalists and then crafted a series of corrective proposals, Congress approved twelve articles of amendment on September 25, 1789, and submitted them to the states for ratification. Contrary to Madison's proposal that the proposed amendments be incorporated into the main body of the Constitution (at the relevant articles and sections of the document), they were proposed as supplemental additions (codicils) to it.[3] Articles Three through Twelve were ratified as additions to the Constitution on December 15, 1791, and became Amendments One through Ten of the Constitution. Article Two became part of the Constitution on May 5, 1992, as the Twenty-seventh Amendment. Article One is still pending before the states.

Although Madison's proposed amendments included a provision to extend the protection of some of the Bill of Rights to the states, the amendments that were finally submitted for ratification applied only to the federal government. The door for their application upon state governments was opened in the 1860s, following ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since the early 20th century both federal and state courts have used the Fourteenth Amendment to apply portions of the Bill of Rights to state and local governments. The process is known as incorporation.[4]
...}

What I would say about the 5th amendment, is that the reason you can not execute someone without a trial is because of the state constitution prohibiting that abuse, not the federal constitution. The federal constitution implies states are sovereign and superior to all federal authority except for where the constitution specifically gives federal superiority. And remember that we do sometimes skip the 5th amendment. For example, in the case of shooting looters during a catastrophe.

 

[progressive hunter]

{... A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ...}

Since "Militia" is capitalized, it implies the called-up, citizen-soldier, national army.
The "right of the people" is plural, so is not clear to imply individuals?

But here is the wiki background.
{...
The United States Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Proposed following the often bitter 1787–88 debate over the ratification of the Constitution and written to address the objections raised by Anti-Federalists, the Bill of Rights amendments add to the Constitution specific guarantees of personal freedoms and rights, clear limitations on the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and explicit declarations that all powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states or the people. The concepts codified in these amendments are built upon those in earlier documents, especially the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), as well as the Northwest Ordinance (1787),[1] the English Bill of Rights (1689), and Magna Carta (1215).[2]

Due largely to the efforts of Representative James Madison, who studied the deficiencies of the Constitution pointed out by anti-federalists and then crafted a series of corrective proposals, Congress approved twelve articles of amendment on September 25, 1789, and submitted them to the states for ratification. Contrary to Madison's proposal that the proposed amendments be incorporated into the main body of the Constitution (at the relevant articles and sections of the document), they were proposed as supplemental additions (codicils) to it.[3] Articles Three through Twelve were ratified as additions to the Constitution on December 15, 1791, and became Amendments One through Ten of the Constitution. Article Two became part of the Constitution on May 5, 1992, as the Twenty-seventh Amendment. Article One is still pending before the states.

Although Madison's proposed amendments included a provision to extend the protection of some of the Bill of Rights to the states, the amendments that were finally submitted for ratification applied only to the federal government. The door for their application upon state governments was opened in the 1860s, following ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since the early 20th century both federal and state courts have used the Fourteenth Amendment to apply portions of the Bill of Rights to state and local governments. The process is known as incorporation.[4]
...}

What I would say about the 5th amendment, is that the reason you can not execute someone without a trial is because of the state constitution prohibiting that abuse, not the federal constitution. The federal constitution implies states are sovereign and superior to all federal authority except for where the constitution specifically gives federal superiority. And remember that we do sometimes skip the 5th amendment. For example, in the case of shooting looters during a catastrophe.

but can a state change their constitution and execute or jail without trial??

the answer is no they cant because the fed constitution applies to everyone except where defined and since the 2nd is clear about "THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE" that means only the people can infringe on their own right and not the feds or the state as per the 10th A

the rest of your comment is just gibberish that doesnt apply to anything,,