- Banned
- #1,821
Liberals' view of the world is based on envy and ignorance about economic realities.
They see someone with wealth or high income, and rather than looking closely to see how it came about (usually through a combination of talent, hard work, and taking intelligent risks), they assume that the wealth is either obtained through some sort of theft or "good fortune."
Consider even the word, "fortunate." When talking about the wealthy or high earners, they frequently use the word "fortunate," PRESUMING that the wealth was the product of some sort of luck. The very idea that it might have resulted from intelligence, hard work, or shrewd risk-taking doesn't even cross a Liberal's mind. Is it "luck" that drives a person to get an MBA or a law degree or a doctorate? Is it LUCK that causes an executive's car to be in the employee's parking lot on Sunday or at 9pm, while the rest of the lot is empty? Are business owners just LUCKY to be working 80 hours a week?
And look at the same word when applied to the other end of the spectrum. Liberals are constantly referring to people with low incomes and minimal assets as "unfortunate." Maybe that is the case, but it is also very possible that a person is "poor" because he is unwilling to DO THE THINGS THAT RESULT IN HIGHER INCOMES OR THE ACCUMULATION OF WEALTH. How difficult is it to get a college degree these days (from a community college and/or state U)? How difficult is it to work hard, come to work on time, seek out opportunities for more responsibility, or even START YOUR OWN BUSINESS?
Who is keeping them from it?
How hard is it to defer having children until you are MARRIED and can AFFORD TO NURTURE THEM PROPERLY? Not too fucking hard, actually. How many of the "poor" are not "unfortunate" at all, but are some combination of stupid, lazy, and criminally self-destructive?
Government - even competent, efficient government, assuming there is such a thing - is expensive and must be paid for by taxes and fees. EVERYONE should be paying federal taxes, not just half the population. But anything more than 1/4 of earned income is theft.
And by the way, I haven't read through all these pages but it would be good to note that when the MARGINAL top income tax rate was over 70% in the 70's and 80's, there was also an umbrella provision that limited the actual taxes to 50% of AGI. Nobody paid 75% of their income to the Federal Government.
Of course your rant is what you'd like to true as you cannot provide any evidence to support that it is. You're a victim of propaganda which almost always is based on, why you should be angry, and who to blame it on.
So the talking head told you what liberals are like. Of course he also did not supply an evidence, but because you were angry at the situation that he described to you, you didn't care.
Sucker play, but you have lots of company. Lots of people who go the no evidence route.
BTW there isn't a single American who wouldn't agree that everyone should be employed and paying taxes. But business has a lot to do creating new high paying jobs before it will happen.
The part of your post that I agree with is that there are many reasons why any particular person might be poor or rich. All the way from completely good or bad fortune to fully earned. However the consequences are comfort for the rich and pain for the poor. So who's more motivated?
I tend to ignore both extremes as outliers and concentrate on the huge majority middle class. The workers who create the country's wealth. The parents who raise the next generation. Those with average luck and average skills. Those with balanced lives.
They are America and they are being taken advantage of by both sets of outliers.