Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you suggesting that "tax-and-spend" is worse than "not-tax-and-spend-anyway"?It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
Pretty funny how you can have cause and effect explained to you and still not understand it.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies. Of course the economy struggles when tax and spend socialists like HW, Clinton, W and Obama are in office
Our conservative posters continue to start thread after thread pertaining to "socialism". And even though their exact definitions are fairly unclear, it's obvious they think that screaming SOCIALISM is, by itself, enough to win a debate.
As most of us can see, more and more people are becoming perfectly comfortable with the word - in part, no doubt, because the Right has completely over-used and diluted it.
How long before the Right realizes the term "socialism" no longer scares people?
.
Are you suggesting that "tax-and-spend" is worse than "not-tax-and-spend-anyway"?It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
Pretty funny how you can have cause and effect explained to you and still not understand it.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies. Of course the economy struggles when tax and spend socialists like HW, Clinton, W and Obama are in office
I didn't suggest that, no. How did you possibly get that out of that post?
But yes, it's better to not tax and spend than tax and spend. You'd better since you'd better make the economy grow to absorb the spending.
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies.
About the same time that the left learn Nazi and Racist will not win the argument either...
Which is NEVER!!!
About the same time that the left learn Nazi and Racist will not win the argument either...
Which is NEVER!!!
Meh... seems to be doing a pretty good job.
Of course, it helps when you guys elect people who think these folks are okay.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
Sure there was. The 2001 recession was caused by Bush's failure to prevent 9/11, his failure to invest in job programs, instead giving huge tax breaks to the rich, and his failure to reign in his buddies at Enron who triggered the whole sell off. Bush's fault.
the 2008 recession was caused by Bush deregulating the banking industry and allowing very lax oversight of Wall Street. (It was like he learned not a damned thing from 2001 or his father's experience in 1990).
Cause and Effect. Happy to have cleared that up for you.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies.
yeah, because we all know putting Libertarian Anarchists in charge, the banks would be on their best behavior and wouldn't try to cheat anyone.
In the end those like you believe everyone that did not vote for Obama during his two terms and those that did not vote for Clinton during her bid must be racist sexist bigots...
Oh, and the GOP failure to stop wasting money and two unpopular wars ( that Clinton supported first before being against ) got them elected out of office in the House and Senate in 2006, but tell everyone about how Democrats did a swell job in Bush last two years in office!
Are you suggesting that "tax-and-spend" is worse than "not-tax-and-spend-anyway"?It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
Pretty funny how you can have cause and effect explained to you and still not understand it.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies. Of course the economy struggles when tax and spend socialists like HW, Clinton, W and Obama are in office
I didn't suggest that, no. How did you possibly get that out of that post?
But yes, it's better to not tax and spend than tax and spend. You'd better since you'd better make the economy grow to absorb the spending.
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Right. Real libertarians favor deficit spending. Forgot all about that one. My bad.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
Sure there was. The 2001 recession was caused by Bush's failure to prevent 9/11, his failure to invest in job programs, instead giving huge tax breaks to the rich, and his failure to reign in his buddies at Enron who triggered the whole sell off. Bush's fault.
the 2008 recession was caused by Bush deregulating the banking industry and allowing very lax oversight of Wall Street. (It was like he learned not a damned thing from 2001 or his father's experience in 1990).
Cause and Effect. Happy to have cleared that up for you.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies.
yeah, because we all know putting Libertarian Anarchists in charge, the banks would be on their best behavior and wouldn't try to cheat anyone.
That isn't what I said, ass wipe. I said we oppose government taxes and spending. Can't read a short post, huh? Let me guess. You went to government schools, didn't you?
Wow, 9/11 happened before March, 2011 when the recession started? And W didn't invest in jobs before he was President? That's amazing, Joe, how do you know all those things? Oh yeah, you're an idiot!
W just continued Clinton's policies and Obama just continued his policies. But only if you care about facts and stupid shit like that
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Our conservative posters continue to start thread after thread pertaining to "socialism". And even though their exact definitions are fairly unclear, it's obvious they think that screaming SOCIALISM is, by itself, enough to win a debate.
As most of us can see, more and more people are becoming perfectly comfortable with the word - in part, no doubt, because the Right has completely over-used and diluted it.
How long before the Right realizes the term "socialism" no longer scares people?
.
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Nope. Spending money we don't have is more irresponsible. It also lets voters off the hook. They can vote for overreaching, overspending federal programs without paying for them. That's the reason the whole show keeps rolling along. If voters had to actually pay for the government they vote for, they might think twice. But with Trump just racking up debt, no one gives a shit about spending. Good call!
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Nope. Spending money we don't have is more irresponsible. It also lets voters off the hook. They can vote for overreaching, overspending federal programs without paying for them. That's the reason the whole show keeps rolling along. If voters had to actually pay for the government they vote for, they might think twice. But with Trump just racking up debt, no one gives a shit about spending. Good call!
The American people have been up to their necks in debt for the past 50 years. Get what you want now and worry about paying for it later.
Why would you expect them to have a government that's any different?
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Nope. Spending money we don't have is more irresponsible. It also lets voters off the hook. They can vote for overreaching, overspending federal programs without paying for them. That's the reason the whole show keeps rolling along. If voters had to actually pay for the government they vote for, they might think twice. But with Trump just racking up debt, no one gives a shit about spending. Good call!
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Nope. Spending money we don't have is more irresponsible. It also lets voters off the hook. They can vote for overreaching, overspending federal programs without paying for them. That's the reason the whole show keeps rolling along. If voters had to actually pay for the government they vote for, they might think twice. But with Trump just racking up debt, no one gives a shit about spending. Good call!
The American people have been up to their necks in debt for the past 50 years. Get what you want now and worry about paying for it later.
Why would you expect them to have a government that's any different?
But what I advocate is not taxing and not spending. You'd know that if you were a libertarian
Yes. That's your favorite insult. Doesn't mean much coming from you though.
You're consistently supporting politicians who devalue our currency and rob taxpayers of wealth with deficit spending.
And seriously, you're advocating high taxes and high spending. Which is why I keep telling you that you're not a libertarian.
No. I'm advocating fiscal responsibility. You must have been absent that day.
Wtf? When did gary johnson do that?
And taxing and spending is the least fiscallly responsible choice, which is why you want it
Nope. Spending money we don't have is more irresponsible. It also lets voters off the hook. They can vote for overreaching, overspending federal programs without paying for them. That's the reason the whole show keeps rolling along. If voters had to actually pay for the government they vote for, they might think twice. But with Trump just racking up debt, no one gives a shit about spending. Good call!
The American people have been up to their necks in debt for the past 50 years. Get what you want now and worry about paying for it later.
Why would you expect them to have a government that's any different?
I don't. But Republicans like to pretend they are all about fiscal responsibility. They are not.
