Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean Harry Browne who ran in 1996 and 2000. Who is Harold Brown?
Here's the Libertarian Party position in 1980 on the military: "We recognize the necessity for maintaining a sufficient military force to defend the United States against aggression."
Again, being selective... They also wanted to withdraw from NATO and cut military spending... they were a joke then, they are a joke now.
That and that you don't know what Libertarians think either
Libertarians don't think. They're fucking morons who enjoy civilization and don't want to do the heavy lifting to maintain it.
We've been over this.
Exactly, this is the stupid extreme that you are. To want to reduce the military is to want to eliminate it. You're just not very smart
No shit, I keep telling you that you don't know what libertarians or Republicans think. I like how you say you don't know what libertarians or Republicans think back to me as if you're making a point
We don't have those Republicans anymore... because the Libertardian Loons have taken over.
Exactly, this is the stupid extreme that you are. To want to reduce the military is to want to eliminate it. You're just not very smart
No, reducing the military at a time when we were in the height of the Cold War facing Soviet Aggression all over the world was beyond fucking retarded. This is why Republicans at the time thought Libertarians were a joke.
Until they got co-opted by them.
No shit, I keep telling you that you don't know what libertarians or Republicans think. I like how you say you don't know what libertarians or Republicans think back to me as if you're making a point
Again, I would love the REpublicans of the 1980's- Fiscal responsibility, strong on national defense.... We don't have those Republicans anymore... because the Libertardian Loons have taken over.
Libertarians don't think. They're fucking morons who enjoy civilization and don't want to do the heavy lifting to maintain it.
We've been over this.
Gotcha. Republicans were fiscally responsible until the libertarians took over and started spending. And I said you didn't know what Republicans or libertarians think. Nailed it!
Unlike most of your flights of fancy, this one is actually a pleasant thought. It's utter nonsense, of course, but it would be nice.
Gotcha. Republicans were fiscally responsible until the libertarians took over and started spending. And I said you didn't know what Republicans or libertarians think. Nailed it!
Yeah, whatever buddy... here was the thing. When Ike and Nixon ran the GOP, you didn't have huge deficits like we have now... The whole crazy Let's cut taxes on rich people thing all came from your boys like the Kochsuckers and Grover Norquist "Make government small enough to drown in a bathtub".
You know nothing about economics. That really should be a core course in high school. It would destroy the Democrat party
You know nothing about economics. That really should be a core course in high school. It would destroy the Democrat party
Guy, I know economics to know what works.
We did it the Democrats way, and got 30 years of prosperity between 1940 and 1970.
We did it the Republicans way, and have gotten FOUR recessions, huge deficits, and dangerous levels of wealth inequality.
You don't know economics or history
You don't know economics or history
Again, I know this history.
9 of the last 10 recessions happened when Republicans were in charge.
It's not a bug, it's a design feature.
First that's another Fake News lie. And second, it doesn't matter who is president during a recession, it depends on who is President before a recession. You get that lie by combining them. For example, here's how you counted W.
2001
President before recession: Clinton
President during recession: W
You count it as W
2008
President before recession: W
President during recession: Obama
You count it as W
First that's another Fake News lie. And second, it doesn't matter who is president during a recession, it depends on who is President before a recession. You get that lie by combining them. For example, here's how you counted W.
2001
President before recession: Clinton
President during recession: W
You count it as W
2008
President before recession: W
President during recession: Obama
You count it as W
Country was in full recession in 2008, not 2009. In fact, it came out of "Recession" (which is technically defined as 2 or more quarters of negative GDP Growth) in 2009, after Obama took measures.
For 2001, um, yeah, Bush gets that one as well, as the recession didn't break out until he became president. Might not had been so bad had he not ignored the CIA when they told him Bin Laden was about to attack.
But again, recessions are a design feature of Republican Governance. Long term economic growth means eventually, the One Percenters have to start sharing some of that money to get top talent.
And the One Percenters just hate sharing the wealth...
It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
Pretty funny how you can have cause and effect explained to you and still not understand it.
Are you suggesting that "tax-and-spend" is worse than "not-tax-and-spend-anyway"?It's pretty funny how you think admitting you have a double standard means you think somehow that contradicts your having a double standard.
Pretty funny how you can have cause and effect explained to you and still not understand it.
It was faux cause and effect:
Joe: W created the recession, Obama was just President during the recession
Joe: It doesn't matter that as soon as W took office the country went into recession, it is on W.
There is no "cause and effect" there, Joe. Just more of your leftist lies.
The correct answer BTW is that W, Clinton and Obama were all responsible for recession economies because they all suck and they all had the same policies. Of course the economy struggles when tax and spend socialists like HW, Clinton, W and Obama are in office
