Polls Are Not To Be Trusted

[BULLDOG]

The Evidence Is Clear: Polls Are Not To Be Trusted

As the polling season commences, wild allegations will be made about poll results. But the evidence is in, polls are not to be trusted. Here's why investors must do their own work when it comes to these matters.

www.forbes.com

They said Hillary would win. In 1948, they said Truman would lose.

I figured out why they like to fudge the polls.
It's so when they cheat the mail in ballots, it's less suspicious and not as obvious as it would be if polls were the other way around.
People don't understand, the mail in ballot fraud is not just used to cheat close state counts or even reverse a close count they don't like.
In 2016 late mail in votes and Found box loads were suspiciously prefilled and lopsided instead of 50/50 the vote counts were miraculously 90/10 Democrat. Nobody noticed the news reporting changed from claiming popular votes of 1 million more to dems then miraculously 2_then 3 then internet propaganda would claim 5 million more votes, yet nobody showed proof, the media claimed it and poof the parrots mimicked the count without question and without getting a cracker. So in 2016 the boxes of mail ins were saved for an aftermath barrative on popular vote to hide the fact they fudged the polls and lied to everyone to keep up campaign finance support = campaign finance fraud. It also gave their supporters hope that their support was not in vain and that their party was more popular.
They are SO BAD AT GOVERNING that they need to cheat in every way shape and form, because there is no way they can win on their record and achievements. In the first day of office, before he could get his WH office seat warm, Trump did more in that 1 single day then Biden did in 40 years of political service. Trump went after Isis day 1 doing more then Biden did with them in his 4 years as a sidekick.

Why would you think that any specific set of votes would be 50-50? That's just dumb.

Because the REGULAR REAL votes where coming in 50/50 the country was split.

3 million more votes for his opponent wasn't what I call split.

NY and Cali might be jacked but mail in were coming in close to 50/50 till the sometimes illegal late tallied ones came in which is how 1 million at the end of the election became 2 then a week later 3 and liars have commented as much as 5 million difference. Do your research, they made voting by this manner so outside foreign manipulation could not target one area to manipulate total votes especially with mail in ballots, it's not just done to keep one region from controlling the many more other regions, and it's not just done to give states almost an equal voice.
Only losers cry about popular vote while ignoring more states favored Trump then crooked Hillary=popular number of states vote. And when you find out what Bill and Hillary did, you will be glad we protect our process this way.

I've heard all the goofy allegations, but haven't seen the first bit of credible evidence for any of it. No crazy right wing conspiracy theory left behind, right?

I've heard of the left saying they would do this or that, but I never ever ever seen it with my own eyes, must be by your logic hogwash. The difference is we have proof Dems are lying, because they control the house, if they could do it then it would have been at least passed in the house, however since they don't want to make this president look good they'd rather sacrifice the country for sake of their party. They were always part of our gov't, if they have a clue of an idea then they would have brought it forth all these years. Biden himself had 40 years to do the things he declares fixable (that he broke) but you somehow think this timw around he'll magically do something=genius!
So in conclusion, if political position money is lower then that of private citizen, and rhey aren't in politics for the people then why woukd a progressive politician choose to serve if not for power and illegal methods of gaining money =corruption.
Corruption requires a need to win at all cost to control the investigative branches that can bring down the racketerring sgemes shajedowbs and pay to play foreign affairs gang. So they cheat in every and all ways, from trading state votes, to dead voters, to illegal and incarcerated voters, to mail in voter fraud, to intimidation, elderly scandles (stealing their voter rights to place votes in their name), to spying on campaigns, setting up moles to spy and sabotage, to media manipularion, to race baitiscare tactics, setting up fake events as opponent supporters, stealing debate questions, controling debate questions, prohibiting equal access to other parties, censoring other party candidates, running other parties embedded into the Dem party (socialist party) for stealing their votes, threatening and attacking opponents campaign gurus, abusing power to attack systematically opponents staff and administrators, obstructing justice, using foreign interference to manipulate the elections, abusing power with false charges (illegal) to mabipulate mid terms to regain the house, abusing power with frivolous impeachment charges also to smokescreen deflect that which your own candidate and lead investigator Adam Schiif themselves committed.
There's so much abuse corruption and illegal activity to cheat elections that I know I must have missed listing bunches more.
For Blind people who can't find their glasses sitting on their head, evidence is wasted, because you choose not to look or care what's so obvious in front of you, even with MSM trying to keep you blinded, it's so obvious that you'd have to be a Biden to be so clueless.

That's interesting and all, but still no credible evidence for your rant. You should pray for the ability to be honest.

You just gave evidence to my previous post regarding Dems mantra to admit nothing by not admitting evidence is valid simply through denial.
Thank you for being my evidence for a former argument. View attachment 356193

You making claims without any corroberating evidence is hardly proof of anything. You are called to be wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove. Instead, you are being as dumb as a rock.

Then what does that make Biden.

Looks like it makes him our next president.

 

[HaShev]

The Evidence Is Clear: Polls Are Not To Be Trusted

As the polling season commences, wild allegations will be made about poll results. But the evidence is in, polls are not to be trusted. Here's why investors must do their own work when it comes to these matters.

www.forbes.com

They said Hillary would win. In 1948, they said Truman would lose.

I figured out why they like to fudge the polls.
It's so when they cheat the mail in ballots, it's less suspicious and not as obvious as it would be if polls were the other way around.
People don't understand, the mail in ballot fraud is not just used to cheat close state counts or even reverse a close count they don't like.
In 2016 late mail in votes and Found box loads were suspiciously prefilled and lopsided instead of 50/50 the vote counts were miraculously 90/10 Democrat. Nobody noticed the news reporting changed from claiming popular votes of 1 million more to dems then miraculously 2_then 3 then internet propaganda would claim 5 million more votes, yet nobody showed proof, the media claimed it and poof the parrots mimicked the count without question and without getting a cracker. So in 2016 the boxes of mail ins were saved for an aftermath barrative on popular vote to hide the fact they fudged the polls and lied to everyone to keep up campaign finance support = campaign finance fraud. It also gave their supporters hope that their support was not in vain and that their party was more popular.
They are SO BAD AT GOVERNING that they need to cheat in every way shape and form, because there is no way they can win on their record and achievements. In the first day of office, before he could get his WH office seat warm, Trump did more in that 1 single day then Biden did in 40 years of political service. Trump went after Isis day 1 doing more then Biden did with them in his 4 years as a sidekick.

Why would you think that any specific set of votes would be 50-50? That's just dumb.

Because the REGULAR REAL votes where coming in 50/50 the country was split.

3 million more votes for his opponent wasn't what I call split.

NY and Cali might be jacked but mail in were coming in close to 50/50 till the sometimes illegal late tallied ones came in which is how 1 million at the end of the election became 2 then a week later 3 and liars have commented as much as 5 million difference. Do your research, they made voting by this manner so outside foreign manipulation could not target one area to manipulate total votes especially with mail in ballots, it's not just done to keep one region from controlling the many more other regions, and it's not just done to give states almost an equal voice.
Only losers cry about popular vote while ignoring more states favored Trump then crooked Hillary=popular number of states vote. And when you find out what Bill and Hillary did, you will be glad we protect our process this way.

I've heard all the goofy allegations, but haven't seen the first bit of credible evidence for any of it. No crazy right wing conspiracy theory left behind, right?

I've heard of the left saying they would do this or that, but I never ever ever seen it with my own eyes, must be by your logic hogwash. The difference is we have proof Dems are lying, because they control the house, if they could do it then it would have been at least passed in the house, however since they don't want to make this president look good they'd rather sacrifice the country for sake of their party. They were always part of our gov't, if they have a clue of an idea then they would have brought it forth all these years. Biden himself had 40 years to do the things he declares fixable (that he broke) but you somehow think this timw around he'll magically do something=genius!
So in conclusion, if political position money is lower then that of private citizen, and rhey aren't in politics for the people then why woukd a progressive politician choose to serve if not for power and illegal methods of gaining money =corruption.
Corruption requires a need to win at all cost to control the investigative branches that can bring down the racketerring sgemes shajedowbs and pay to play foreign affairs gang. So they cheat in every and all ways, from trading state votes, to dead voters, to illegal and incarcerated voters, to mail in voter fraud, to intimidation, elderly scandles (stealing their voter rights to place votes in their name), to spying on campaigns, setting up moles to spy and sabotage, to media manipularion, to race baitiscare tactics, setting up fake events as opponent supporters, stealing debate questions, controling debate questions, prohibiting equal access to other parties, censoring other party candidates, running other parties embedded into the Dem party (socialist party) for stealing their votes, threatening and attacking opponents campaign gurus, abusing power to attack systematically opponents staff and administrators, obstructing justice, using foreign interference to manipulate the elections, abusing power with false charges (illegal) to mabipulate mid terms to regain the house, abusing power with frivolous impeachment charges also to smokescreen deflect that which your own candidate and lead investigator Adam Schiif themselves committed.
There's so much abuse corruption and illegal activity to cheat elections that I know I must have missed listing bunches more.
For Blind people who can't find their glasses sitting on their head, evidence is wasted, because you choose not to look or care what's so obvious in front of you, even with MSM trying to keep you blinded, it's so obvious that you'd have to be a Biden to be so clueless.

That's interesting and all, but still no credible evidence for your rant. You should pray for the ability to be honest.

You just gave evidence to my previous post regarding Dems mantra to admit nothing by not admitting evidence is valid simply through denial.
Thank you for being my evidence for a former argument. View attachment 356193

You making claims without any corroberating evidence is hardly proof of anything. You are called to be wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove. Instead, you are being as dumb as a rock.

Then what does that make Biden.

Looks like it makes him our next president.

You just called your half the country dumber then a rock. Congrats, the road to recovery starts by admitting your problem, next stage is resolving your problem.

 

[sartre play]

Polls only as good as the people putting out the polls, that means most are useless.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Attention: Don't trust polls! (This week)

 

[BULLDOG]

The Evidence Is Clear: Polls Are Not To Be Trusted

As the polling season commences, wild allegations will be made about poll results. But the evidence is in, polls are not to be trusted. Here's why investors must do their own work when it comes to these matters.

www.forbes.com

They said Hillary would win. In 1948, they said Truman would lose.

I figured out why they like to fudge the polls.
It's so when they cheat the mail in ballots, it's less suspicious and not as obvious as it would be if polls were the other way around.
People don't understand, the mail in ballot fraud is not just used to cheat close state counts or even reverse a close count they don't like.
In 2016 late mail in votes and Found box loads were suspiciously prefilled and lopsided instead of 50/50 the vote counts were miraculously 90/10 Democrat. Nobody noticed the news reporting changed from claiming popular votes of 1 million more to dems then miraculously 2_then 3 then internet propaganda would claim 5 million more votes, yet nobody showed proof, the media claimed it and poof the parrots mimicked the count without question and without getting a cracker. So in 2016 the boxes of mail ins were saved for an aftermath barrative on popular vote to hide the fact they fudged the polls and lied to everyone to keep up campaign finance support = campaign finance fraud. It also gave their supporters hope that their support was not in vain and that their party was more popular.
They are SO BAD AT GOVERNING that they need to cheat in every way shape and form, because there is no way they can win on their record and achievements. In the first day of office, before he could get his WH office seat warm, Trump did more in that 1 single day then Biden did in 40 years of political service. Trump went after Isis day 1 doing more then Biden did with them in his 4 years as a sidekick.

Why would you think that any specific set of votes would be 50-50? That's just dumb.

Because the REGULAR REAL votes where coming in 50/50 the country was split.

3 million more votes for his opponent wasn't what I call split.

NY and Cali might be jacked but mail in were coming in close to 50/50 till the sometimes illegal late tallied ones came in which is how 1 million at the end of the election became 2 then a week later 3 and liars have commented as much as 5 million difference. Do your research, they made voting by this manner so outside foreign manipulation could not target one area to manipulate total votes especially with mail in ballots, it's not just done to keep one region from controlling the many more other regions, and it's not just done to give states almost an equal voice.
Only losers cry about popular vote while ignoring more states favored Trump then crooked Hillary=popular number of states vote. And when you find out what Bill and Hillary did, you will be glad we protect our process this way.

I've heard all the goofy allegations, but haven't seen the first bit of credible evidence for any of it. No crazy right wing conspiracy theory left behind, right?

I've heard of the left saying they would do this or that, but I never ever ever seen it with my own eyes, must be by your logic hogwash. The difference is we have proof Dems are lying, because they control the house, if they could do it then it would have been at least passed in the house, however since they don't want to make this president look good they'd rather sacrifice the country for sake of their party. They were always part of our gov't, if they have a clue of an idea then they would have brought it forth all these years. Biden himself had 40 years to do the things he declares fixable (that he broke) but you somehow think this timw around he'll magically do something=genius!
So in conclusion, if political position money is lower then that of private citizen, and rhey aren't in politics for the people then why woukd a progressive politician choose to serve if not for power and illegal methods of gaining money =corruption.
Corruption requires a need to win at all cost to control the investigative branches that can bring down the racketerring sgemes shajedowbs and pay to play foreign affairs gang. So they cheat in every and all ways, from trading state votes, to dead voters, to illegal and incarcerated voters, to mail in voter fraud, to intimidation, elderly scandles (stealing their voter rights to place votes in their name), to spying on campaigns, setting up moles to spy and sabotage, to media manipularion, to race baitiscare tactics, setting up fake events as opponent supporters, stealing debate questions, controling debate questions, prohibiting equal access to other parties, censoring other party candidates, running other parties embedded into the Dem party (socialist party) for stealing their votes, threatening and attacking opponents campaign gurus, abusing power to attack systematically opponents staff and administrators, obstructing justice, using foreign interference to manipulate the elections, abusing power with false charges (illegal) to mabipulate mid terms to regain the house, abusing power with frivolous impeachment charges also to smokescreen deflect that which your own candidate and lead investigator Adam Schiif themselves committed.
There's so much abuse corruption and illegal activity to cheat elections that I know I must have missed listing bunches more.
For Blind people who can't find their glasses sitting on their head, evidence is wasted, because you choose not to look or care what's so obvious in front of you, even with MSM trying to keep you blinded, it's so obvious that you'd have to be a Biden to be so clueless.

That's interesting and all, but still no credible evidence for your rant. You should pray for the ability to be honest.

You just gave evidence to my previous post regarding Dems mantra to admit nothing by not admitting evidence is valid simply through denial.
Thank you for being my evidence for a former argument. View attachment 356193

You making claims without any corroberating evidence is hardly proof of anything. You are called to be wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove. Instead, you are being as dumb as a rock.

Then what does that make Biden.

Looks like it makes him our next president.

You just called your half the country dumber then a rock. Congrats, the road to recovery starts by admitting your problem, next stage is resolving your problem.
View attachment 356507

I'm sorry about your comprehension problems.

 

[HaShev]

comprehension problems.

No you are deflecting again, I understood what you said, you however "didn't get" that;
when someone like me with above 98% of the population IQ is called dumb as a rock, & who made professor Stephen Hawking (who people deemed the smartest man) admit he was wrong about his theory on time travel and lacking proof and made then President Bill Clinton validate my thesis with Hawkings in a Science Symposium, then a lesser IQ and absent minded declining politician who was deemed dumb in the first place=has to be deemed dumber than the dumber than a rock.
You stated your party is dumb enough to run that dumber than the dumb as rocks candidate making your 50% of the Country dumber than the dumber than a rock. Try to keep up.
You would know this if you had a pet rock teach you. Want me to explain it slower, so you'll understand?
"Whaaaaat -dooooooes -aaaaaaayyyyyy -yelllllloooowwww- Liiiiiightttt meeeeeaaaaannnnn?"

 

[BULLDOG]

comprehension problems.

No you are deflecting again, I understood what you said, you however "didn't get" that;
when someone like me with above 98% of the population IQ is called dumb as a rock, & who made professor Stephen Hawking (who people deemed the smartest man) admit he was wrong about his theory on time travel and lacking proof and made then President Bill Clinton validate my thesis with Hawkings in a Science Symposium, then a lesser IQ and absent minded declining politician who was deemed dumb in the first place=has to be deemed dumber than the dumber than a rock.
You stated your party is dumb enough to run that dumber than the dumb as rocks candidate making your 50% of the Country dumber than the dumber than a rock. Try to keep up.
You would know this if you had a pet rock teach you. Want me to explain it slower, so you'll understand?
"Whaaaaat -dooooooes -aaaaaaayyyyyy -yelllllloooowwww- Liiiiiightttt meeeeeaaaaannnnn?"

View attachment 356614

Wow, I;ll bet your IQ must be at least 214. I don't mind when a crazy right winger lies to me. I don't think you can help it. But when your lies are that outrageous, it's a little insulting for you to think I am dumb enough to believe it. You helped elect an idiot. His bullshit will be corrected.

 

[HaShev]

comprehension problems.

No you are deflecting again, I understood what you said, you however "didn't get" that;
when someone like me with above 98% of the population IQ is called dumb as a rock, & who made professor Stephen Hawking (who people deemed the smartest man) admit he was wrong about his theory on time travel and lacking proof and made then President Bill Clinton validate my thesis with Hawkings in a Science Symposium, then a lesser IQ and absent minded declining politician who was deemed dumb in the first place=has to be deemed dumber than the dumber than a rock.
You stated your party is dumb enough to run that dumber than the dumb as rocks candidate making your 50% of the Country dumber than the dumber than a rock. Try to keep up.
You would know this if you had a pet rock teach you. Want me to explain it slower, so you'll understand?
"Whaaaaat -dooooooes -aaaaaaayyyyyy -yelllllloooowwww- Liiiiiightttt meeeeeaaaaannnnn?"

View attachment 356614

Wow, I;ll bet your IQ must be at least 214. I don't mind when a crazy right winger lies to me. I don't think you can help it. But when your lies are that outrageous, it's a little insulting for you to think I am dumb enough to believe it. You helped elect an idiot. His bullshit will be corrected.

And there you go losing a previous argument about admit nothing, deny everything mantra of the left.
I dare you to pull up the science symposium
Bill Clinton had with Stephen Hawking and listen to the weird admission Clinton made about
" time messaging" at that time we officially validated the possibilities by sending sound faster then the speed of light.
You just keep digging a deeper hole and can't admit anything, because you'd be admitting that you insulted yourself. If you are not higher in IQ then 98% of the population then you called yourself dumber then the person you called dumb as a rock. You burned yourself, so now you make up ad hominem responses to save your frail human ego from feeling inadequate.

 

[BULLDOG]

comprehension problems.

No you are deflecting again, I understood what you said, you however "didn't get" that;
when someone like me with above 98% of the population IQ is called dumb as a rock, & who made professor Stephen Hawking (who people deemed the smartest man) admit he was wrong about his theory on time travel and lacking proof and made then President Bill Clinton validate my thesis with Hawkings in a Science Symposium, then a lesser IQ and absent minded declining politician who was deemed dumb in the first place=has to be deemed dumber than the dumber than a rock.
You stated your party is dumb enough to run that dumber than the dumb as rocks candidate making your 50% of the Country dumber than the dumber than a rock. Try to keep up.
You would know this if you had a pet rock teach you. Want me to explain it slower, so you'll understand?
"Whaaaaat -dooooooes -aaaaaaayyyyyy -yelllllloooowwww- Liiiiiightttt meeeeeaaaaannnnn?"

View attachment 356614

Wow, I;ll bet your IQ must be at least 214. I don't mind when a crazy right winger lies to me. I don't think you can help it. But when your lies are that outrageous, it's a little insulting for you to think I am dumb enough to believe it. You helped elect an idiot. His bullshit will be corrected.

And there you go losing a previous argument about admit nothing, deny everything mantra of the left.
I dare you to pull up the science symposium
Bill Clinton had with Stephen Hawking and listen to the weird admission Clinton made about
" time messaging" at that time we officially validated the possibilities by sending sound faster then the speed of light.
You just keep digging a deeper hole and can't admit anything, because you'd be admitting that you insulted yourself. If you are not higher in IQ then 98% of the population then you called yourself dumber then the person you called dumb as a rock. You burned yourself, so now you make up ad hominem responses to save your frail human ego from feeling inadequate.
View attachment 356632

If you participated in a symposium with Stephen Hawking and Bill Clinton, there has to be a link somewhere showing that. Of course I'm pretty sure you just pulled the entire story out of your ass, but if you have a credible link to you proving Stephen Hawkng wrong, I would like to see it.

 

[basquebromance]

vote like your lives depend on it, because it does

 

[Claudette]

We know, polls don't count unless they favor trump.

Nope. Polls don't count period. Even the ones that tell you what you want to see and hear are bogus.

Anyone who puts their faith in a poll is dumber than a box of rocks. Oh and I'd bet the Hitlery supporters were all believing all those 2016 polls, talking heads and news folks that told them that Hitlery would be the POTUS.

Polls are bull shit.

 

[healthmyths]

We know, polls don't count unless they favor trump.

I look at facts.
Here is one fact:
In 2016, a study by the Center for Public Integrity showed that 96% of campaign donations by journalists went to Hillary Clinton, compared to just 3.5% which went to Trump. Think of it.
96% donations were blown by the MSM and what is their way of getting even?
Now this is by Erin Coates---January 14, 2020 at 9:27am
In the 100 days after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the impeachment investigation, a recent study found the top three evening newscasts have broadcast 93 percent negative coverage of President Donald Trump.
Study: Network Coverage of Trump Was 93 Percent Negative in Recent Months
99.64% BLM’s Defund The Police Donations Go To Joe Biden Campaign Via ActBlue

One moment, please...

stillnessinthestorm.com

Biden Campaign Staff Donates to Organization That Bails Out Rioters Arrested in Minneapolis

Biden Campaign Staff Donates to Organization That Bails Out Rioters Arrested in Minneapolis

Campaign staff for Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden are bragging about their recent donations to a far-left organization that bails out rioters arrested in Minneapolis. Reuters reported that 13 members of

townhall.com

Hmmm...
Fraud': Mainstream polls use 29% more Democrats than Republicans

‘Fraud’: Mainstream polls use 29% more Democrats than Republicans - Washington Examiner

Most of the top political polls that got the 2016 presidential race dead wrong are continuing to use a flawed methodology in rating President Trump's approval ratings that favors Democrats, women and younger voters, according to a new analysis. The report shows that the mainstream polls...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[HaShev]

comprehension problems.

No you are deflecting again, I understood what you said, you however "didn't get" that;
when someone like me with above 98% of the population IQ is called dumb as a rock, & who made professor Stephen Hawking (who people deemed the smartest man) admit he was wrong about his theory on time travel and lacking proof and made then President Bill Clinton validate my thesis with Hawkings in a Science Symposium, then a lesser IQ and absent minded declining politician who was deemed dumb in the first place=has to be deemed dumber than the dumber than a rock.
You stated your party is dumb enough to run that dumber than the dumb as rocks candidate making your 50% of the Country dumber than the dumber than a rock. Try to keep up.
You would know this if you had a pet rock teach you. Want me to explain it slower, so you'll understand?
"Whaaaaat -dooooooes -aaaaaaayyyyyy -yelllllloooowwww- Liiiiiightttt meeeeeaaaaannnnn?"

View attachment 356614

Wow, I;ll bet your IQ must be at least 214. I don't mind when a crazy right winger lies to me. I don't think you can help it. But when your lies are that outrageous, it's a little insulting for you to think I am dumb enough to believe it. You helped elect an idiot. His bullshit will be corrected.

And there you go losing a previous argument about admit nothing, deny everything mantra of the left.
I dare you to pull up the science symposium
Bill Clinton had with Stephen Hawking and listen to the weird admission Clinton made about
" time messaging" at that time we officially validated the possibilities by sending sound faster then the speed of light.
You just keep digging a deeper hole and can't admit anything, because you'd be admitting that you insulted yourself. If you are not higher in IQ then 98% of the population then you called yourself dumber then the person you called dumb as a rock. You burned yourself, so now you make up ad hominem responses to save your frail human ego from feeling inadequate.
View attachment 356632

If you participated in a symposium with Stephen Hawking and Bill Clinton, there has to be a link somewhere showing that. Of course I'm pretty sure you just pulled the entire story out of your ass, but if you have a credible link to you proving Stephen Hawkng wrong, I would like to see it.

You accused me of reading comprehension problems yet that is not what I said. I never participated in the Symposium, I was probably the cause of it. *L* at your link excuse, try asking archive experts or Clinton Library archivers.
This might be the Symposium (you didn't find it because it's a non biased non propaganda news source *L*):

Science in the Next Millennium

As part of the Millennium Program, Professor Stephen Hawking, Physicist at Cambridge University, spoke about the future of scientific endeavor. He stressed that societies will never reach the utopian visions of science fiction because scientific and technological development would persist. He...

www.c-span.org

Are you chickening out and doubling down on your demonization and ad hominems, because if so then you proved my points well.
I don't have to lie, I've yet to lose an argument with you and that is the least of my achievements.
It must be nice to call everyone a moron and liar a drinker and drug user, that you can't subvert, fool, and enslave. Has Ad Hominems ever won you an argument or mastership yet? Show me where you made someone submit to your logic through hate filled anger personal attacks?

 

[Zorro!]

The Evidence Is Clear: Polls Are Not To Be Trusted

As the polling season commences, wild allegations will be made about poll results. But the evidence is in, polls are not to be trusted. Here's why investors must do their own work when it comes to these matters.

www.forbes.com

They said Hillary would win. In 1948, they said Truman would lose.

I don't know, seems pretty scientific.

Biden's lead over Trump nearly doubled nationally to 14 percentage points after first debate in NBC/WSJ poll (but before Trump's hospitalization) Biden's national lead over Trump jumps to 14 points after debate in new NBC News/WSJ poll

The poll sampled 35% DEM, 27% REP, 38% IND. So a DEM+8 vs REP.
The last poll sampled DEM+3.
So they changed the weighting by 5 points and now report “OMG BIDEN IS UP ANOTHER 6 POINTS FROM THE LAST POLL!”