Popular Mechanics

well you thought wrong....and only a real investigation and release of all forensic evidence
for scrutiny from a independent inquiry can definitively answer your question

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

i thought you all haved proved beyond a reasonable doubt that an airplane had not hit the pentagon....had not been flown into the ground and had not hit the wtcs....are you now saying it is possible that it was airplanes....

there are many theories on the details....what is very clear if the white house version of events are false

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
 
i thought you all haved proved beyond a reasonable doubt that an airplane had not hit the pentagon....had not been flown into the ground and had not hit the wtcs....are you now saying it is possible that it was airplanes....

there are many theories on the details....what is very clear if the white house version of events are false

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

well i guess when the fredoom of information act kicks in you will be able to get the documents you want .... till then .....all yall are guessing......
 
it goes beyond guessing that the official story is a lie...or there was prior knowledge ...and there is no question of a cover-up...but on the details .. all tho well reasoned..the arguments are indeed theory...
 
it goes beyond guessing that the official story is a lie...or there was prior knowledge ...and there is no question of a cover-up...but on the details .. all tho well reasoned..the arguments are indeed theory...

there is no question people do not have the information they think they should have......

from there ..... people have gone where they like .....
 
where are the airplanes and all the people.....

Addressing that issue would require logic, which is something you have to have a complete lack of in order to believe in these dumbass conspiracies.

what i find interesting is you can't break into an office building in dc without the press finding out.....but.....

you can steal two elections, hide four airplanes make thousands of people disapear, blow up the pentagone, blow up buildings in downtown new york, invade two countries and destroy your your reputation in the process yet no one can prove you did any of it......oh yea and steall trillions of dollars via aig......
 
a new investifgation would be a huge waste of tax payer funds
they would only find what we already know and these morons would STILL say it was an inside job
 
a new investifgation would be a huge waste of tax payer funds
they would only find what we already know and these morons would STILL say it was an inside job

honestly, it's no more of a waste than some of the stuff in Obama's stimulus package.
 
a new investifgation would be a huge waste of tax payer funds
they would only find what we already know and these morons would STILL say it was an inside job

honestly, it's no more of a waste than some of the stuff in Obama's stimulus package.
maybe so
but since it wouldnt convince these morons anyway, and they are the ONLY ones that want it

why bother?
 
Can anyone tell me in less than an entire page why Popular Mechanics is wrong?
 
Can anyone tell me in less than an entire page why Popular Mechanics is wrong?

well for one thing even the nist report is not even in agreement with the popular mechanics
theories

Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

http://ww/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm

This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements.


NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.


NIST's Investigation of the Sept. 11 World Trade Center Disaster - Frequently Asked Questions
 
Can anyone tell me in less than an entire page why Popular Mechanics is wrong?

well for one thing even the nist report is not even in agreement with the popular mechanics
theories

Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

http://ww/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm

This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements.


NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.


NIST's Investigation of the Sept. 11 World Trade Center Disaster - Frequently Asked Questions
interesting
your link to the NIST actually DOES say it was pancaked
 

NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse
, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top