Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
Well, that's a loaded question. If I answer in the affirmative, and agree with you that you don't whine at me because I don't fit your preferred definition of Buddhist, then I have to ignore some things you've said to me. (see bold).
Good point, except I wasn't talking to you, and even if I was it wouldn't have been because you did not fit my definition of Buddhist. As I recall you are the one that objects to the Tamil Tigers calling themselves Buddhist.
In other words, you are the one who is trying to impose your definition of Buddhism on others, not me.
There is a difference between IMPOSING a view and sharing a view. I share my view of Buddhism and Christianity and preaching.
I'm not imposing it on anyone. You are quite free to have your own ideas about Buddhism and Christianity.
Our perspectives are different naturally. You are a practicing Christian, I am a former Catholic, practicing Buddhist.
You also impose your view when you insist that Catholics support pedophilia, or that the Christian Dominion movement wants to take over the world.