Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GuyPinestra cannot even argument his point logically.
There are no gun banning laws in the mill. There will be none.
No one wants to take Guy's or my weapons from us.
However, their is no legitimate need for us to have military-style weapons.
OK, same question Jake..
Can you define 'assault weapon'? Or as you put it, 'military-style'...?
More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
GuyPinestra cannot even argument his point logically.
There are no gun banning laws in the mill. There will be none.
No one wants to take Guy's or my weapons from us.
However, their is no legitimate need for us to have military-style weapons.
OK, same question Jake..
Can you define 'assault weapon'? Or as you put it, 'military-style'...?
More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
OK, same question Jake..
Can you define 'assault weapon'? Or as you put it, 'military-style'...?
Nice dodge. The call for more gun laws is being heard far and wide. Josefk just proposed it in this thread and you agreed with him, the only difference being you called them 'military style' weapons.
Now since you want to outlaw 'military style weapons' and Josefk wants to outlaw 'assault weapons', would you care to define the weapon you want outlawed?
And this time try to answer the question, OK?
More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
OK, same question Jake..
Can you define 'assault weapon'? Or as you put it, 'military-style'...?
Nice dodge. The call for more gun laws is being heard far and wide. Josefk just proposed it in this thread and you agreed with him, the only difference being you called them 'military style' weapons.
Now since you want to outlaw 'military style weapons' and Josefk wants to outlaw 'assault weapons', would you care to define the weapon you want outlawed?
And this time try to answer the question, OK?
Your say so is not evidence, my friend. And may you quote where I said, "JoseK, I agree with you old buddy," or you can competently be called a falsifier. You are so in over your depth, fellow. So let me help you.
Your affirmative argument to show where such programs are coming from, chapter and verse.
You need to show that Henry and Miller protect military style weapons, chapter and verse.
Then I can elect to respond to your affirmation.
And this time try to answer the question, OK?More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
Nice dodge. The call for more gun laws is being heard far and wide. Josefk just proposed it in this thread and you agreed with him, the only difference being you called them 'military style' weapons.
Now since you want to outlaw 'military style weapons' and Josefk wants to outlaw 'assault weapons', would you care to define the weapon you want outlawed?
And this time try to answer the question, OK?
Your highlighted statement above shows either A.) Your predilection to ban such weapons or B.) Your childish desire to play semantic games. I was working under the assumption that it was A. If I'm wrong, tell me and I'll stop responding to you.Jake Starkey said:GuyPinestra cannot even argument his point logically.
There are no gun banning laws in the mill. There will be none.
No one wants to take Guy's or my weapons from us.
However, their is no legitimate need for us to have military-style weapons.
More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
Nice dodge. The call for more gun laws is being heard far and wide. Josefk just proposed it in this thread and you agreed with him, the only difference being you called them 'military style' weapons.
Now since you want to outlaw 'military style weapons' and Josefk wants to outlaw 'assault weapons', would you care to define the weapon you want outlawed?
And this time try to answer the question, OK?
OK
Why don't we start with weapons used in massacres?
Count the dozens of bodies and figure out what weapons were used
OK
Why don't we start with weapons used in massacres?
Count the dozens of bodies and figure out what weapons were used
More importantly, you made the argument that there were such. Your affirmative, old buff. A caution, too. If you mention court cases, give us the exact brief that supports your contention.
OK, same question Jake..
Can you define 'assault weapon'? Or as you put it, 'military-style'...?
Nice dodge. The call for more gun laws is being heard far and wide. Josefk just proposed it in this thread and you agreed with him, the only difference being you called them 'military style' weapons.
Now since you want to outlaw 'military style weapons' and Josefk wants to outlaw 'assault weapons', would you care to define the weapon you want outlawed?
And this time try to answer the question, OK?
GuyPinestra cannot even argument his point logically.
There are no gun banning laws in the mill. There will be none.
No one wants to take Guy's or my weapons from us.
However, their is no legitimate need for us to have military-style weapons.
Bring in stricter gun controls, period...;o)
the left has already started their bullshit ,but the funny thing i'll bet that the killer was an anarchist that has a lot of the same views the lefts OWS bums have !!How long before the Tragedy of the Batman Movie shooting will be twisted Politically into another Anti gun Campaign by the Democrats? I'm thinking Monday Morning the pro gun ban people will be in high gear. I think that they will use the weekend to plan their strike which will commence at 9AM Monday morning on all of those usual suspect shows. They will wait until the majority of people who aren't Democrats do what they do best... Go to WORK.
the left has already started their bullshit ,but the funny thing i'll bet that the killer was an anarchist that has a lot of the same views the lefts OWS bums have !!How long before the Tragedy of the Batman Movie shooting will be twisted Politically into another Anti gun Campaign by the Democrats? I'm thinking Monday Morning the pro gun ban people will be in high gear. I think that they will use the weekend to plan their strike which will commence at 9AM Monday morning on all of those usual suspect shows. They will wait until the majority of people who aren't Democrats do what they do best... Go to WORK.
James Holmes, the suspect arrested in connection with the mass shootings at a screening of the new Batman movie early this morning in Aurora, CO, could be a registered Democrat, according to documents obtained by Breitbart News. Earlier, ABC News Brian Ross and George Stephanopoulos speculated on Good Morning America that Holmes was a Tea Party member, based solely on a name appearing on a Tea Party website.
Bring in stricter gun controls, period...;o)
Such as...?
Bring in stricter gun controls, period...;o)
Such as...?
No CCW.
Mandatory license
Mandatory Firearms test
Mandatory Firearms training before licensing
I wonder if we'll see something like the Trayvon hoodie targets... perhaps batman themed bullets.
People will market anything.
Such as...?
No CCW.
Mandatory license
Mandatory Firearms test
Mandatory Firearms training before licensing
And how would these measures have stopped any of the killers on that list of massacres that I posted?
