Previously anonymous whistleblower now testifying in front of Congress

[Catsnmeters]

He already has such evidence. Jordon enunciated it.

They have evidence garland refused to them investigate?

Link it please.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The FACTS were that 1) Biden did not report major income from foreign companies and 2) the IRS was blocked from investigating.

That is alarming on its own.

That is why he s looking to get a plea deal on tax evasion.

We already knew that.

 

[bripat9643]

Now you are claiming the entire report was a lie.

Flat out denial is not an argument.

You are wasting my time.

Have a great day.

Yeah, it was pretty much a lie.

 

[jc456]

Now you are claiming the entire report was a lie.

Flat out denial is not an argument.

You are wasting my time.

Have a great day.

Hoax is nothing but

 

[bripat9643]

They have evidence garland refused to them investigate?

Link it please.

huh?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yeah, it was pretty much a lie.

Thanks for your opinion.

 

[Catsnmeters]

huh?

That is the major part of Gyms silly investigation. That the DoJ stopped Weiss from looking into it.

 

[bripat9643]

That is the major part of Gyms silly investigation. That the DoJ stopped Weiss from looking into it.

Who is Gym?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Who is Gym?

Ah, sealioning.

Very cute.

 

[jc456]

Thanks for your opinion.

It was factual

 

[bripat9643]

Ah, sealioning.

Very cute.

what is "sealioning?"

 

[Lisa558]

They have evidence garland refused to them investigate?

Link it please.

The evidence is their testimony. You don’t know what evidence is, do you?

 

[bripat9643]

That is the major part of Gyms silly investigation. That the DoJ stopped Weiss from looking into it.

Says you. of course, that is obstruction of justice, which is a major crime..

 

[Catsnmeters]

what is "sealioning?"

Looks like you gave up on the thread too.

Have a great day.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The evidence is their testimony. You don’t know what evidence is, do you?

I have already had this conversation with another poster ...who oddly said nearly the same thing as you.

Certainly their opinion on if their should have been an investigation is evidence that they themselves have opinions but beyond that all that really matters at this point is if Weiss can collaborate the narrative Garland stopped the investigation...which he hasn't.

Why do you think that is?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Says you. of course, that is obstruction of justice, which is a major crime..

So where is the proof they stopped the investigation?

Did Weiss provide it today?

 

[Lisa558]

So where is the proof they stopped the investigation?

Did Weiss provide it today?

The proof is that the whistleblowers testified that they weren’t allowed to investigate.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The proof is that the whistleblowers testified that they weren’t allowed to investigate.

Who is they?

Where is the document that shows Garland prohibited the investigation? His signature must be in the investigative request.

What has Weiss said about this? I haven't heard him even make that claim.

Who signed the request blocking the investigation?

 

[Lisa558]

Who is they?

Where is the document that shows Garland prohibited the investigation? His signature must be in the investigative request.

What has Weiss said about this? I haven't heard him even make that claim.

Who signed the request blocking the investigation?

They are the two whistleblowers who testified. They said they were blocked from investigating.

You don’t need the other stuff. Their word is the proof.

 

[Marener]

Their word is the proof.

Yeah, that’s now how it works.