Previously anonymous whistleblower now testifying in front of Congress

[Coyote]

They are the two whistleblowers who testified. They said they were blocked from investigating.

You don’t need the other stuff. Their word is the proof.

They said they were also blocked when they were under Trump.

 

[Marener]

They said they were also blocked when they were under Trump.

It really just amounts to judgement calls they didn’t agree with specifically around any decisions that would have made the investigation public just before the election.

The DoJ was quite intent to keep the investigation as quiet as possible.

 

[Lisa558]

Yeah, that’s now how it works.

When the gold digger said Trump “aggressively touched her“ in the store dressing room 30 years ago, her testimony was proof. But when two professional, credible IRS officers testify against Biden, it’s not good enough?

 

[Lisa558]

They said they were also blocked when they were under Trump.

The issue is the DOJ was protecting Biden.

 

[Marener]

When the gold digger said Trump “aggressively touched her“ in the store dressing room 30 years ago, her testimony was proof

No, it wasn’t.

Have you heard the other side of the story? Of course not. You heard what you wanted and decided it’s over.

 

[The Duke]

All the Dem idiots won’t because it’s only on FOX.

I am listening as to how the DOJ blocked and slow walked this investigation, and hid the contents of Hinter’s laptop, and how they dragged it out to let the statute of limitations expire. And it goes on from there.

The Dems have turned this country into a Banana Republic.

The FBI and Big Tech AND the media put their thumbs on the scale of the 2020 election.

 

[Coyote]

The issue is the DOJ was protecting Biden.

The Trump DoJ would not have been protecting Biden.

 

[Marener]

The FBI and Big Tech AND the media put their thumbs on the scale of the 2020 election.

So you think big tech and media don’t have the right to free speech?

 

[Lisa558]

The Trump DoJ would not have been protecting Biden.

Sure they would. It’s the same DOJ that went after him for the made-up Russia conspiracy hoax.

 

[Lisa558]

So you think big tech and media don’t have the right to free speech?

Not if they are being told to BLOCK free speech by the FBI.

 

[The Duke]

The Trump DoJ would not have been protecting Biden.

It's still the Obama DOJ, literally.

 

[Coyote]

Sure they would. It’s the same DOJ that went after him for the made-up Russia conspiracy hoax.

B.S. This was the DoJ under Trump’s hand picked person.

 

[toobfreak]

Finally, I notice that this hearing ~ ~ ~ is not being covered by MSNBC, CNN, ABC, and other liberal news.

And so should all be prosecuted for election tampering. They selectively present the news for whatever hurts repubs and Trump the most while protecting Biden and the democrats--- that is not journalism.

 

[Marener]

Not if they are being told to BLOCK free speech by the FBI.

Social media websites weren’t forced to do anything.

 

[Marener]

And so should all be prosecuted for election tampering. They selectively present the news for whatever hurts repubs and Trump the most while protecting Biden and the democrats--- that is not journalism.

You guys get a little more fascist every day.

 

[The Duke]

B.S. This was the DoJ under Trump’s hand picked person.

And who was everybody else that was in that place there?

Hmm?

 

[Lisa558]

Social media websites weren’t forced to do anything.

They were pressures to suppress the Hunter laptop, and the SCOTUS ruled that a violation of 1st Amendment rights. Don’t you libs know ANYTHING?

 

[Lisa558]

You guys get a little more fascist every day.

^^^ says the guy whose party colluded with social media to hide information negative to Democrats.

 

[Marener]

^^^ says the guy whose party colluded with social media to hide information negative to Democrats.

Uh, that’s like what Fox News does every day for Republicans.

And has for decades.

So what’s your complaint here?

 

[Marener]

They were pressures to suppress the Hunter laptop, and the SCOTUS ruled that a violation of 1st Amendment rights. Don’t you libs know ANYTHING?

I know that’s false. The people involved testified they did no such thing which is PROOF! According to you.