Priceless

[SYTFE]

Where'd you go, coward? Looks like P@triot scurried off like the cockroach he is. Fucking coward.

Run away...conservative. Run away....

The reason why she WASN'T ARRESTED and WASN'T CHARGED for a crime was precisely because she CAN do what she did you fucking idiot. You're too much of a fucking coward to admit that she did NOTHING illegal, even though you know it -- because like all conservatives, you're a born coward. A fraud. A hack. An American hating piece of dogshit.

Again, P@triot -- she CAN express herself in that manner even if she risks being escorted out of the room because the GODDAMN CONSTITUTION GIVES HER THAT RIGHT. And I know you hate that. It just burns you inside so badly because you can't do a damn thing about it.

Fascist scum. Fucking coward. Run away, you little bitch....run away....Or come back! I'll only abuse you some more and continue to embarrass you, over and over and over.

We don't arrest people for thought crimes, you have to actually open your mouth and break the law. She did and was arrested.

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

 

[saveliberty]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

A seizure or forcible restraint; an exercise of the power to deprive a person of his or her liberty; the taking or keeping of a person in custody by legal authority, especially, in response to a criminal charge.

An arrest may occur (1) by the touching or putting hands on the arrestee; (2) by any act that indicates an intention to take the arrestee into custody and that subjects the arrestee to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest; or (3) by the consent of the person to be arrested. There is no arrest where there is no restraint, and the restraint must be under real or pretended legal authority. However, the detention of a person need not be accompanied by formal words of arrest or a station house booking to constitute an arrest.

Police detention

You have the right to remain silent, though I doubt you are able.

 

[saveliberty]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

A seizure or forcible restraint; an exercise of the power to deprive a person of his or her liberty; the taking or keeping of a person in custody by legal authority, especially, in response to a criminal charge.

An arrest may occur (1) by the touching or putting hands on the arrestee; (2) by any act that indicates an intention to take the arrestee into custody and that subjects the arrestee to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest; or (3) by the consent of the person to be arrested. There is no arrest where there is no restraint, and the restraint must be under real or pretended legal authority. However, the detention of a person need not be accompanied by formal words of arrest or a station house booking to constitute an arrest.

Police detention

You have the right to remain silent, though I doubt you are able.

 

[SYTFE]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

A seizure or forcible restraint; an exercise of the power to deprive a person of his or her liberty; the taking or keeping of a person in custody by legal authority, especially, in response to a criminal charge.

An arrest may occur (1) by the touching or putting hands on the arrestee; (2) by any act that indicates an intention to take the arrestee into custody and that subjects the arrestee to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest; or (3) by the consent of the person to be arrested. There is no arrest where there is no restraint, and the restraint must be under real or pretended legal authority. However, the detention of a person need not be accompanied by formal words of arrest or a station house booking to constitute an arrest.

Police detention

You have the right to remain silent, though I doubt you are able.

Thanks for the copy and paste, you mindless drone. Again, she was NOT arrested, NOT charged for any crime -- end of fucking story.

 

[saveliberty]

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

Land and structures owned by the federal government are considered "public" in the sense that they are owned by the taxpayers of the United States. Not all public areas are considered public forums for free speech purposes, however, and the government can disallow speech on certain government property altogether.

Finally, there are "nonforums" - areas that are not open to unfettered communication by members of the public. Examples of nonforums include government offices and other areas where uninhibited speech could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Members of the public are generally free to express themselves in traditional and designated public forums, but the government can subject their speech to what are known as "time, place and manner" restrictions that regulate the when, where and how of a speaker's message. These restrictions must be applied evenly, and must ignore the content of each particular expression.

FindLaw | Legal News & Information: Free Speech, Protesting and Your Rights

This was a nonforum area and event.

 

[saveliberty]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

A seizure or forcible restraint; an exercise of the power to deprive a person of his or her liberty; the taking or keeping of a person in custody by legal authority, especially, in response to a criminal charge.

An arrest may occur (1) by the touching or putting hands on the arrestee; (2) by any act that indicates an intention to take the arrestee into custody and that subjects the arrestee to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest; or (3) by the consent of the person to be arrested. There is no arrest where there is no restraint, and the restraint must be under real or pretended legal authority. However, the detention of a person need not be accompanied by formal words of arrest or a station house booking to constitute an arrest.

Police detention

You have the right to remain silent, though I doubt you are able.

Thanks for the copy and paste, you mindless drone. Again, she was NOT arrested, NOT charged for any crime -- end of fucking story.

Prove she was not arrested then.

 

[SYTFE]

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

Land and structures owned by the federal government are considered "public" in the sense that they are owned by the taxpayers of the United States. Not all public areas are considered public forums for free speech purposes, however, and the government can disallow speech on certain government property altogether.

Finally, there are "nonforums" - areas that are not open to unfettered communication by members of the public. Examples of nonforums include government offices and other areas where uninhibited speech could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Members of the public are generally free to express themselves in traditional and designated public forums, but the government can subject their speech to what are known as "time, place and manner" restrictions that regulate the when, where and how of a speaker's message. These restrictions must be applied evenly, and must ignore the content of each particular expression.

FindLaw | Legal News & Information: Free Speech, Protesting and Your Rights

This was a nonforum area and event.

And?

 

[saveliberty]

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

Land and structures owned by the federal government are considered "public" in the sense that they are owned by the taxpayers of the United States. Not all public areas are considered public forums for free speech purposes, however, and the government can disallow speech on certain government property altogether.

Finally, there are "nonforums" - areas that are not open to unfettered communication by members of the public. Examples of nonforums include government offices and other areas where uninhibited speech could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Members of the public are generally free to express themselves in traditional and designated public forums, but the government can subject their speech to what are known as "time, place and manner" restrictions that regulate the when, where and how of a speaker's message. These restrictions must be applied evenly, and must ignore the content of each particular expression.

FindLaw | Legal News & Information: Free Speech, Protesting and Your Rights

This was a nonforum area and event.

And?

I demonstrated that she was under arrest by definition and cited law AND proved she broke the law. It is now on you to disprove with proofs I am incorrect, not simply stating your opinion and insults.

 

[saveliberty]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

Like you have authority to revoke my citizenship and Constitutional rights.

 

[SYTFE]

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

Land and structures owned by the federal government are considered "public" in the sense that they are owned by the taxpayers of the United States. Not all public areas are considered public forums for free speech purposes, however, and the government can disallow speech on certain government property altogether.

Finally, there are "nonforums" - areas that are not open to unfettered communication by members of the public. Examples of nonforums include government offices and other areas where uninhibited speech could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Members of the public are generally free to express themselves in traditional and designated public forums, but the government can subject their speech to what are known as "time, place and manner" restrictions that regulate the when, where and how of a speaker's message. These restrictions must be applied evenly, and must ignore the content of each particular expression.

FindLaw | Legal News & Information: Free Speech, Protesting and Your Rights

This was a nonforum area and event.

And?

I demonstrated that she was under arrest by definition and cited law AND proved she broke the law. It is now on you to disprove with proofs I am incorrect, not simply stating your opinion and insults.

No, you didn't "demonstrate" anything. You want her to have been arrested. Learn the difference between your fantasies and REALITY.

Again -- she broke NO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged with any crime.

What does that mean? It means she damn well CAN do exactly what she did in that room -- until being escorted out. But it was well within her legal rights as citizen protected by the constitution. Deal with it, or pack your bags.

 

[saveliberty]

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

Land and structures owned by the federal government are considered "public" in the sense that they are owned by the taxpayers of the United States. Not all public areas are considered public forums for free speech purposes, however, and the government can disallow speech on certain government property altogether.

Finally, there are "nonforums" - areas that are not open to unfettered communication by members of the public. Examples of nonforums include government offices and other areas where uninhibited speech could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Members of the public are generally free to express themselves in traditional and designated public forums, but the government can subject their speech to what are known as "time, place and manner" restrictions that regulate the when, where and how of a speaker's message. These restrictions must be applied evenly, and must ignore the content of each particular expression.

FindLaw | Legal News & Information: Free Speech, Protesting and Your Rights

This was a nonforum area and event.

And?

I demonstrated that she was under arrest by definition and cited law AND proved she broke the law. It is now on you to disprove with proofs I am incorrect, not simply stating your opinion and insults.

No, you didn't "demonstrate" anything. You want her to have been arrested. Learn the difference between your fantasies and REALITY.

Again -- she broke NO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged with any crime.

What does that mean? It means she damn well CAN do exactly what she did in that room -- until being escorted out. But it was well within her legal rights as citizen protected by the constitution. Deal with it, or pack your bags.

So...no proof.

She was not escorted, she was physically removed. It was in the video and that would mean lawsuit, unless she was under arrest.

Looks like you need to leave the country.

 

[saveliberty]

"Can you get my coat", is kind of a give away you are NOT leaving voluntarily.

...In Wisconsin, in December...

 

[DOTR]

They're getting sick of being led into misery by pushy nagging women with personal problems.

Aren't we all.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Where'd you go, coward? Looks like P@triot scurried off like the cockroach he is. Fucking coward.

Run away...conservative. Run away....

The reason why she WASN'T ARRESTED and WASN'T CHARGED for a crime was precisely because she CAN do what she did you fucking idiot. You're too much of a fucking coward to admit that she did NOTHING illegal, even though you know it -- because like all conservatives, you're a born coward. A fraud. A hack. An American hating piece of dogshit.

Again, P@triot -- she CAN express herself in that manner even if she risks being escorted out of the room because the GODDAMN CONSTITUTION GIVES HER THAT RIGHT. And I know you hate that. It just burns you inside so badly because you can't do a damn thing about it.

Fascist scum. Fucking coward. Run away, you little bitch....run away....Or come back! I'll only abuse you some more and continue to embarrass you, over and over and over.

We don't arrest people for thought crimes, you have to actually open your mouth and break the law. She did and was arrested.

She broke ZERO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged for any crime. Lie some more -- I'll only punish you like the other gimp.

........but now the Trump Justice Dept will get to look into it.

 

[Neotrotsky]

One of the best things to ever come out of the Donald Trump campaign and subsequent election is the chance to see the real progressive. The hate. The violence. The intolerance. And of course, the unhinged, emotional, irrational mindset. All one has to do is point to these videos of progressives having meltdowns as evidence of why it's a good idea to reject that entire ideology. I mean, seriously, what adult acts like this?

look who they ran..... now we know why the reaction

 

[P@triot]

This is officially my favorite answer all-time on USMB. Have you noticed that SYTFE went away? It's because that woman was arrested! I suspect little SYTFE there asked an adult to help her with Google and she realized she was screwed! Literally every angle that she has tried has backfired in her stupid face.

This is for you Patriot. You've earned it.

View attachment 103036

Thank you sir!

 

[P@triot]

No, you didn't "demonstrate" anything. You want her to have been arrested. Learn the difference between your fantasies and REALITY.

Again -- she broke NO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged with any crime. What does that mean? It means she damn well CAN do exactly what she did in that room -- until being escorted out. But it was well within her legal rights as citizen protected by the constitution. Deal with it, or pack your bags.

So...no proof.

She was not escorted, she was physically removed. It was in the video and that would mean lawsuit, unless she was under arrest.

Looks like you need to leave the country.

Wow...that nitwit came back for another huge helping of crow?!? LMAO! I love how she denies that the woman broke any laws when I posted the laws and then denies that she was arrested when I posted the video of her being arrested.

 

[P@triot]

Again -- she broke NO laws, was NOT arrested, and was NOT charged with any crime.

Yeah....uh....she actually broke multiple laws:

• Disturbing the Peace

• Disorderly Conduct

• 6-11-34.1 - Preventing or disrupting General Assembly sessions or other meetings of members; unlawful activities within the state capitol or certain Capitol Square buildings

It's ok sweetie... believe me, I understand more than anyone how you progressives are completely clueless of the U.S. Constitution, the laws, etc.

 

[P@triot]

What does that mean? It means she damn well CAN do exactly what she did in that room -- until being escorted out. But it was well within her legal rights as citizen protected by the constitution. Deal with it, or pack your bags.

Well that's an odd thing to say. Why would she be "escorted out" (to quote you) if what she did was legal and if "she damn well CAN" do it?

 

[P@triot]

No, she wasn't. Being escorted out of the room is not the same as being arrested, and is for damn sure miles away from actually being charged with a crime. Everything she did was 100% in bounds within the rights granted to her by the constitution -- no matter how much you and your pansy fascist friend want that to be untrue. Sorry toots, but this is America where we have freedom of speech. Deal with it -- or get the fuck out. Try Saudi Arabia.

A seizure or forcible restraint; an exercise of the power to deprive a person of his or her liberty; the taking or keeping of a person in custody by legal authority, especially, in response to a criminal charge.

An arrest may occur (1) by the touching or putting hands on the arrestee; (2) by any act that indicates an intention to take the arrestee into custody and that subjects the arrestee to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest; or (3) by the consent of the person to be arrested. There is no arrest where there is no restraint, and the restraint must be under real or pretended legal authority. However, the detention of a person need not be accompanied by formal words of arrest or a station house booking to constitute an arrest.

Police detention

You have the right to remain silent, though I doubt you are able.

Thanks for the copy and paste, you mindless drone. Again, she was NOT arrested, NOT charged for any crime -- end of fucking story.

You have to love little SYTFE - when she denies reality and someone proves her wrong by citing specific facts, she whines about the "copy and paste".

Uh....ok. Well stop denying reality then and we won't have to "copy and paste" statutes for you.