sealybobo
Diamond Member
- Jun 5, 2008
- 123,673
- 22,102
What's wrong with "real people" being killed then? Adults are killed in nature all the time. Survival of the fittest is the natural law. Why not simply gas poor neighborhoods and kill off the excess population that is a net drain on society if life itself is not intrinsically valuable?
The rich know exactly how many poor people die every year because they don't have the best healthcare possible. It is a sacrifice republicans are certainly willing to make so don't give me this we care about life. You care about a seed in a belly and you hate living humans who don't have enough money. Or you are at least indifferent to their suffering.
GM knew some people would die and weighed the costs and lost.
Louis CK is an atheist I believe. He said, "I drive a $50K infinity. I could easily save how many people from suffering and dieing if I bought a $20K car instead and donated the other $30K to the poor starving people of the world BUT I/WE don't and we sleep just fine at night.
You fucking right wing hypocrites. I care about life, you care about potential life.
I notice you didn't answer any of my questions. If it is ok for babies to be killed because in nature 50% of turtle babies don't make it off the beach, why are adults different? Adult animals are killed every day in nature too. From your perspective, why should I care if anyone gets killed? It's natural, after all, for animals to kill each other. If you are going to base some of your rationalization on nature, why differentiate?
Adult humans die all the time. Car crashes, cancer, aids. Some wonder if they allow cigarettes to thin the herd. Clearly we allow a killer product for the sake of capitalism. So how precious is life? So if I'm free to kill myself with cigarettes or a gun, why can't I terminate a seed in my belly?
Lets put it this way. No living breathing walking or crawling human should suffer or die needlessly. And in a perfect world everyone would want to have their babies and the planet would have plenty of room for them all. Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world. The planet would be better off if 1/3'rd of us disappeared.
I can't wait to see Planet of the Apes. I hear that is the premise. Something wipes out enough humans to allow the Apes to take over. I bet you anything the planet is better off. Who's more important? 1/3rd of humans + the planet and all the other animals or the 2/3rd of humans we can do without? If you can't keep your legs crossed and you get knocked up, feel free to have an abortion. And have a cigarette too.