Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
same shit coming from a different mouth.
Just because you want to ignore reality.
It is not the same shit. It is the same truth that you refuse to acknowledge. So far, data supporting gun control: 0
same shit coming from a different mouth.
I live in Chicago, and it's pretty darn apparent that gun laws don't make a difference on whether or not people get shot.
If you want to end a GREAT MAJORITY of gun violence within the US your agenda should look like this:
1.) Help get folks a good education, a job, and encourage people to form strong, caring families (ie reduce poverty). Virtually 100% of Chicago violence is in highly impoverished neighborhoods.
2.) Get your kids off of SSRI inhibitors and unnecessary brain drugs that messes with their chemistry. Virtually every single mass shooter was on some sort of a psychiatric drug. Every one...
This is the reality; either you can deny it or embrace it.
.
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
Let me rephrase; looks like extremely strict gun laws really don't have a great effect on reducing gun violence. Chicago has some of the US's strictest laws, yet at the same time some of the highest gun-murder rates in the US. Gun laws clearly aren't Chicago's solution.... so what is?
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the OP would agree that reducing poverty and effectively improving our educational system would reduce gun-violence in the US (correct me if I'm wrong, Longknife).
This is sort of a no-brainer.
.
Survival, Realized | Human Events
“I worked behind the scenes. I co-produced a music video, a montage tribute to John,” said Frankel, referring to a co-worker who had shielded his wife from the raging lunatic. “I never missed an opportunity to publicize our stories, especially Scully’s, and campaign for gun control. I helped organize a march down California Street. I co-produced a documentary marking the first anniversary of the massacre. I was on the front lines of the gun control movement and I was exploiting the tragedy to make political gains.”
But in the back of Frankel’s mind loomed an unshakable question. If the gunman had found him hiding in an office, armed only with a woefully inadequate blunt object, would it have saved him? Or would he have died too?
Over the years and in places ranging from Maui to South Dakota, Frankel encountered more violent criminals and a lack of police presence. He realized that some of the same laws he had once promoted were preventing him from reasonable self-defense. That lingering doubt about if he would have survived, paired against encounters with fleeing felons, local rapists and a convicted murderer slowly changed Frankel from a gun control promoter to a practicing gun rights litigator.
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
Let me rephrase; looks like extremely strict gun laws really don't have a great effect on reducing gun violence. Chicago has some of the US's strictest laws, yet at the same time some of the highest gun-murder rates in the US. Gun laws clearly aren't Chicago's solution.... so what is?
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the OP would agree that reducing poverty and effectively improving our educational system would reduce gun-violence in the US (correct me if I'm wrong, Longknife).
This is sort of a no-brainer.
.
What WOULD reduce gun violence in the USA - especially in ghettos - is two have TWO PARENT families with a father and mother who teach their children the benefits of learning, hard work, and morality.
Until then, no amount of taxpayer money is going to make a difference!
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
Let me rephrase; looks like extremely strict gun laws really don't have a great effect on reducing gun violence. Chicago has some of the US's strictest laws, yet at the same time some of the highest gun-murder rates in the US. Gun laws clearly aren't Chicago's solution.... so what is?
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the OP would agree that reducing poverty and effectively improving our educational system would reduce gun-violence in the US (correct me if I'm wrong, Longknife).
This is sort of a no-brainer.
.
What WOULD reduce gun violence in the USA - especially in ghettos - is two have TWO PARENT families with a father and mother who teach their children the benefits of learning, hard work, and morality.
Until then, no amount of taxpayer money is going to make a difference!
Let me rephrase; looks like extremely strict gun laws really don't have a great effect on reducing gun violence. Chicago has some of the US's strictest laws, yet at the same time some of the highest gun-murder rates in the US. Gun laws clearly aren't Chicago's solution.... so what is?
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the OP would agree that reducing poverty and effectively improving our educational system would reduce gun-violence in the US (correct me if I'm wrong, Longknife).
This is sort of a no-brainer.
.
What WOULD reduce gun violence in the USA - especially in ghettos - is two have TWO PARENT families with a father and mother who teach their children the benefits of learning, hard work, and morality.
Until then, no amount of taxpayer money is going to make a difference!
See? Told you. His solution requires the change of the entire human race which is fantasy. Which makes it a perfect solution. Name something that cant happen and claim that will solve everything. He might as well said getting the feather of a unicorn will work
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
Let me rephrase; looks like extremely strict gun laws really don't have a great effect on reducing gun violence. Chicago has some of the US's strictest laws, yet at the same time some of the highest gun-murder rates in the US. Gun laws clearly aren't Chicago's solution.... so what is?
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the OP would agree that reducing poverty and effectively improving our educational system would reduce gun-violence in the US (correct me if I'm wrong, Longknife).
This is sort of a no-brainer.
.
What WOULD reduce gun violence in the USA - especially in ghettos - is two have TWO PARENT families with a father and mother who teach their children the benefits of learning, hard work, and morality.
Until then, no amount of taxpayer money is going to make a difference!
What WOULD reduce gun violence in the USA - especially in ghettos - is two have TWO PARENT families with a father and mother who teach their children the benefits of learning, hard work, and morality.
Until then, no amount of taxpayer money is going to make a difference!
See? Told you. His solution requires the change of the entire human race which is fantasy. Which makes it a perfect solution. Name something that cant happen and claim that will solve everything. He might as well said getting the feather of a unicorn will work
And your approach denies that people are violent and that people will attack, brutalize and kill other people no matter what. You just think victims should be defenseless.
See? Told you. His solution requires the change of the entire human race which is fantasy. Which makes it a perfect solution. Name something that cant happen and claim that will solve everything. He might as well said getting the feather of a unicorn will work
And your approach denies that people are violent and that people will attack, brutalize and kill other people no matter what. You just think victims should be defenseless.
Show me where I implied any of that dummy?
I say some gun control measure will work. The OP says no purposed or imagined gun control measure in the future will work.
And your approach denies that people are violent and that people will attack, brutalize and kill other people no matter what. You just think victims should be defenseless.
Show me where I implied any of that dummy?
I say some gun control measure will work. The OP says no purposed or imagined gun control measure in the future will work.
You say that some gun control may work with no specifics and nothing to analyze and then call others dumb. Try again. Lets hear this proposed gun control measure that is going to make one iota of difference and then use some actual data to back up your claims. I have plenty of data and found almost nothing in it that signifies stricter gun control measures will lead to jack shit. They have been tried in a hundred localities over a variety of different functions and all of it simply shows that gun controls lead to almost zero impact in the number of homicides that happen. It is the reason that gun control advocates never use real data.
See? Told you. His solution requires the change of the entire human race which is fantasy. Which makes it a perfect solution. Name something that cant happen and claim that will solve everything. He might as well said getting the feather of a unicorn will work
And your approach denies that people are violent and that people will attack, brutalize and kill other people no matter what. You just think victims should be defenseless.
Show me where I implied any of that dummy?
I say some gun control measure will work. The OP says no purposed or imagined gun control measure in the future will work.
same shit coming from a different mouth.
I live in Chicago, and it's pretty darn apparent that gun laws don't make a difference on whether or not people get shot.
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
If you want to end a GREAT MAJORITY of gun violence within the US your agenda should look like this:
1.) Help get folks a good education, a job, and encourage people to form strong, caring families (ie reduce poverty). Virtually 100% of Chicago violence is in highly impoverished neighborhoods.
2.) Get your kids off of SSRI inhibitors and unnecessary brain drugs that messes with their chemistry. Virtually every single mass shooter was on some sort of a psychiatric drug. Every one...
This is the reality; either you can deny it or embrace it.
.
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
I live in Chicago, and it's pretty darn apparent that gun laws don't make a difference on whether or not people get shot.
See? Who says gun laws means no one will get shot? No one, but as long as you stand on that pillar and base every argument on that. Sure you think you're right...you're right about something no one has said ever
If you want to end a GREAT MAJORITY of gun violence within the US your agenda should look like this:
1.) Help get folks a good education, a job, and encourage people to form strong, caring families (ie reduce poverty). Virtually 100% of Chicago violence is in highly impoverished neighborhoods.
2.) Get your kids off of SSRI inhibitors and unnecessary brain drugs that messes with their chemistry. Virtually every single mass shooter was on some sort of a psychiatric drug. Every one...
This is the reality; either you can deny it or embrace it.
.
According to the OP ANY purposed solution wont work so take it up with the nay sayer.
Retard alert, you are a liar, no one is suggesting getting rid of current laws, just that banning weapons doesn't work and preventing law abiding citizens from arming themselves doesn't work. How about you be truthful for once?
Show me where I implied any of that dummy?
I say some gun control measure will work. The OP says no purposed or imagined gun control measure in the future will work.
You say that some gun control may work with no specifics and nothing to analyze and then call others dumb. Try again. Lets hear this proposed gun control measure that is going to make one iota of difference and then use some actual data to back up your claims. I have plenty of data and found almost nothing in it that signifies stricter gun control measures will lead to jack shit. They have been tried in a hundred localities over a variety of different functions and all of it simply shows that gun controls lead to almost zero impact in the number of homicides that happen. It is the reason that gun control advocates never use real data.
No because this isn't about the Closed Caption bill. You want to make it about me and I'm not falling for your little Saul Alinksky bullshit.
The OP said nothing will ever work. I disagreed. Do you believe that no gun control measure will ever do anything about gun violence? Maybe it's because I'm an optimist and cant predict the future so I disagree.
And you?
