Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no difference between offering to pay someone's mortgage off and offering to pay someone's legal fees?There is no difference.
None. Nads. No difference. They are paying the person to come forward in the end.There is no difference between offering to pay someone's mortgage off and offering to pay someone's legal fees?There is no difference.
There is no difference in offering to give someone 3 quarters of a million dollars when you don't even know what, if any, legal fees there will be for coming forward and accusing Trump of something?
Bwuhahaha....
You don't seem to have a problem calling out this greedy Jewess and her mother. Why?(A greedy Jew
I left the only part of Steve's post that is really relevant to why he started this thread.
Always fascinating to hear from Trump voters.
I certainly don't understand why trampanzees/RWrs get tagged with that unfair anti-semitic label.And a lot more including book deals with Bloom (A greedy Jew like her mom, Gloria Allred) getting a commission in return for their TV show interviews.
Exclusive: Prominent lawyer sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
Yeah, I guess the 'Herman Cain' treatment of parading out false accusers, paying them money to do so, every election time against opposing candidates has become such the 'norm' for Democrats / Snowflakes that they see it as all the same.None. Nads. No difference. They are paying the person to come forward in the end.
None. Nads. No difference. They are paying the person to come forward in the end.There is no difference between offering to pay someone's mortgage off and offering to pay someone's legal fees?There is no difference.
There is no difference in offering to give someone 3 quarters of a million dollars when you don't even know what, if any, legal fees there will be for coming forward and accusing Trump of something?
Bwuhahaha....
It takes a lot of money to go up against Trump. He has a bad habit of counter suing his victims.What evidence do you have they were lying?So let me make sure I understand the benchmarks being laid down here.
1) No one should raise money for the victim of a crime.
2) No one should sell the rights to a story about the victim of a crime.
Do I have that right?
No. No one should fund OBVIOUS FALSE ACCUSERS.
This is fraud, these people belong in prison.
The fact that they are being paid to Mae these claims
But you conveniently forgot that, didn't you.
'Incentive' to agree to help the Anti-Trumpers by being the 'face' of another false accusation... ;pSo how does paying a mortgage prepare for a counter suit?
You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.
California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.
Ummm...maybe because Bill Clinton lied his ass off to the world only to be discredited with DNA from a Red Dress, proving both he was an adulterous perv who preyed on Interns and a liar....Why don't the Cons do to Trump what they did to B. Clinton?
Ummm...maybe because Clinton - the 1st sitting President to be sued / have to testify in a court case against him while acting as President - was found 'Guilty' of Contempt of Court for deceptive testimony - attempting to deny a US citizen of her right to a Fair Trial - resulting in his being disbarred, unable to practice law in his home state of Arkansas....
...whereas there is only unproven / false allegations from Snowflakes against Trump thus far - NO EVIDENCE.
(Didn't you try this in another thread, and I shot it down there, too...or was that a different desperate snowflake using the same Liberal Talking Points?
You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.
California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.
Sorry, I had tried to force the whole ugly affair out of my mind....Oh, come on man! It was a blue dress!
Obvious to your small info wars mind.So let me make sure I understand the benchmarks being laid down here.
1) No one should raise money for the victim of a crime.
2) No one should sell the rights to a story about the victim of a crime.
Do I have that right?
No. No one should fund OBVIOUS FALSE ACCUSERS.
This is fraud, these people belong in prison.
It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.
California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.
You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?
And what legal costs have they had exactly?
It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.
California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.
You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?
And what legal costs have they had exactly?
Would they have made the claim without the promise of compensation? Doubtful. Your atr trying to grab the nonexistent higher ground in the scum.It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.
Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.
California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.
The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.
You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?
And what legal costs have they had exactly?
Again difference between paying someone to make a claim and offering to pay legal fees after they've made one.
