Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers

[Rambunctious]

Lisa Bloom sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews.

Exclusive: Prominent lawyer sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
Russia/Sex abuse...
It's all falling apart now...

 

[Rambunctious]

Attorney Lisa Bloom sought to line up paydays for women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct: report

 

[Rambunctious]

Lisa Bloom tried to bag 'donations' for Trump accusers | Daily Mail Online

 

[Votto]

Where can I get some of this money?

I may have been molested by either a room for of Dims or Trump. It's all a little hazy, I just need to have someone help my jog my memory.

Who pays the best?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.

Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers

A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.

California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.

The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.


Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.

You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?

You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?

And what legal costs have they had exactly?

It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.

wrong paying legal expenses ONLY applies if they get sued and have to go to court,paying their mortgage or offering them 750000 dollars is a direct bribe to make an accusation.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

....

Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.

Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers

A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.

California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.

The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.


Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.

You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?

You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?

And what legal costs have they had exactly?

It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.

Again difference between paying someone to make a claim and offering to pay legal fees after they've made one.

Would they have made the claim without the promise of compensation? Doubtful. Your atr trying to grab the nonexistent higher ground in the scum.

paying legal fees is not compensation dumb ass it ony pays if sued and then only pays lawyer and court costs. No money is given to the accuser for personal use like paying the mortgage or 750k to do as you wish with.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Dems are totally depraved

 

[MrShangles]

So let me make sure I understand the benchmarks being laid down here.

1) No one should raise money for the victim of a crime.

2) No one should sell the rights to a story about the victim of a crime.

Do I have that right?

You’re just a little off, let me help.

1) if you’re losing an election, pay as many people as you can in the last few days for fake accusations.

Hope that helps your little snowflake mind, do you need crayons now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Bloom flew from California to New York to harass one of the women in the hospital.

 

[Coyote]

Being reported by many, if this is true, what does this mean for Americas future? Is this in fact the angle the left are looking to exploit and abuse? I am betting yes. Right out of the Communist handbook.

Prominent lawyer Lisa Bloom sought donor cash for two Trump accusers

A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trumpduring the final months of the 2016 election, according to documents and interviews.

California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.

The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.


Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.

You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?

You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?

And what legal costs have they had exactly?

It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.

wrong paying legal expenses ONLY applies if they get sued and have to go to court,paying their mortgage or offering them 750000 dollars is a direct bribe to make an accusation.

It is all a "bribe". You're just trying to give a free pass to your side.

 

[Coyote]

....

You know the Republicans paid the legal costs for Bill Clinton's accusers right?

You understand there is a difference between paying for someone's legal costs and paying them to make a claim, right?

And what legal costs have they had exactly?

It amounts to the same thing in the end. You are paying someone to make a claim. Would they have made the claim if they had not been paid? This splitting of hairs is nothing more than partisan hypocrisy.

Again difference between paying someone to make a claim and offering to pay legal fees after they've made one.

Would they have made the claim without the promise of compensation? Doubtful. Your atr trying to grab the nonexistent higher ground in the scum.

paying legal fees is not compensation dumb ass it ony pays if sued and then only pays lawyer and court costs. No money is given to the accuser for personal use like paying the mortgage or 750k to do as you wish with.

Paying a person's legal fees is NOT compensation?

 

[Rambunctious]

It is all a "bribe". You're just trying to give a free pass to your side.

Kills any court case for any of them that excepted the greenbacks.....

 

[Coyote]

It is all a "bribe". You're just trying to give a free pass to your side.

Kills any court case for any of them that excepted the greenbacks.....

I don't think so.

A court case isn't dependent on that but on evidence.

 

[Rambunctious]

I don't think so.

A court case isn't dependent on that but on evidence.

Well I'm not an expert but if I were on a jury and heard the accuser was paid for her testimony I would be Leary to say the least and I'm sure the public would respond similarly...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It is all a "bribe". You're just trying to give a free pass to your side.

Kills any court case for any of them that excepted the greenbacks.....

I don't think so.

A court case isn't dependent on that but on evidence.

When all the evidence is the statement of the parties, and the parties are paid for their testimony, that is a bribe.

The entire Trump as sexual predator fol de rol is over.

 

[Coyote]

I don't think so.

A court case isn't dependent on that but on evidence.

Well I'm not an expert but if I were on a jury and heard the accuser was paid for her testimony I would be Leary to say the least and I'm sure the public would respond similarly...

Courts are different. That kind of stuff might not even be admissable.

 

[Coyote]

It is all a "bribe". You're just trying to give a free pass to your side.

Kills any court case for any of them that excepted the greenbacks.....

I don't think so.

A court case isn't dependent on that but on evidence.

When all the evidence is the statement of the parties, and the parties are paid for their testimony, that is a bribe.

The entire Trump as sexual predator fol de rol is over.

Hey - it worked for you guys and Clinton.

 

[nat4900]

The entire Trump as sexual predator fol de rol is over.

LOL

Donald J Trump Brags About Grabbing Women "by the pussy ...

 

[Rambunctious]

Courts are different. That kind of stuff might not even be admissable.

Could be...not sure...

 

[Coyote]

The entire Trump as sexual predator fol de rol is over.

LOL

Donald J Trump Brags About Grabbing Women "by the pussy ...

Unfortunately...that is caught on tape and regardless of whether you think it's just locker room talk - it's his VIEW on women....and it lends credence to the allegations.