Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
And in the process neglect other posters. Got it
What "neglect" is that? Is it REALLY necessary to have ALL DISCUSSIONS with absolute rights for EVERYONE to troll and deflect and flame?
Trolling is impossible to avoid. Look at the clean debate forum. I dunno sounds like some elitist shit to me, but have at it
We have very little problem with the CDZ. A small fraction of the folks "forget" where they are. But all in all -- is not much work.
Here's a fact.. At LEAST 75% of the deletions and warnings we issue are for CONTENT-FREE personal exchanges. Just mindless sniping. What do you think the percentage would be in a thread where YOU invited the guests? I think it would be the LEAST of our workload.
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
And in the process neglect other posters. Got it
What "neglect" is that? Is it REALLY necessary to have ALL DISCUSSIONS with absolute rights for EVERYONE to troll and deflect and flame?
Trolling is impossible to avoid. Look at the clean debate forum. I dunno sounds like some elitist shit to me, but have at it
We have very little problem with the CDZ. A small fraction of the folks "forget" where they are. But all in all -- is not much work.
Here's a fact.. At LEAST 75% of the deletions and warnings we issue are for CONTENT-FREE personal exchanges. Just mindless sniping. What do you think the percentage would be in a thread where YOU invited the guests? I think it would be the LEAST of our workload.
Wow. Sounds really confusing a shitload of work for staff. Why not just put back social groups? Tis the same thing.USMB Mod Staff is preparing to roll out a new feature. This is a TRIAL, not a guarantee that it will work out. The success of this concept depends largely on the ability of our members to "self-moderate" themselves and cooperate with the rules for this feature. It is NOT open yet. THis is an opportunity to comment on the plan and the rules. The explanation here is LONG. So if you tl;dr it -- this feature is probably not gonna work for you..
The feature is having "Invite Only" threads. They will all reside in the Structured Debate forum for now. For those of you not familiar with the Struct Debate forum, it's a place where the OP can stipulate an ADDITIONAL 3 rules for the thread participants in addition to normal Zone2 moderation. You will be able to still use the ORIGINAL Struct Debate rules OR create an Invite Only thread that meets all the guidelines below.
The concept is that any member can start a thread on any topic that would be acceptable in Zone2 or Zone3 and choose 12 people to "invite in" for the discussion. Sorting out the invites and who are people you want and trust is all on you.. In the future, the number of invites may increase and I've tested that at LEAST 25 are possible.
Read the guidelines carefully. They are more complicated than other forums and we must get compliance on every one of them to make this work. I honestly believe this could be the most popular feature on USMB and give folks a break from being constantly on the front lines of a very nasty Amer. political divide while having to deal with Mega trolls and Ultra partisan Battle Bots. It's NOT a safe zone. It's NOT a "chat room" or clubhouse. These are topical discussions meant to promote more uninterrupted adult discussion.
Comments/suggestions are welcome -- but stick to discussing this feature and the rules.
Rules for Posting "Invite Only" Threads -------- Forum not opened yet !!!!
For an "Invite Only" thread in the Structured Debate Forum ---- where OPs have always been allowed to stipulate 3 additional rules of their own. Under an "Invite Only" format this will automatically adopt 2 rules automatically -- you need not specify these..
Make Rule One that Site Wide Rules apply and threads will be Zone3 moderated
In addition -->
-- flaming or mention of ANY MEMBER (including moderators) who is not in the Invite list is not allowed. Not even by pseudonames or pet names. You want to flame USMB members, don't whimp out. Take it to the Flame Zone where they can flame back. You want to go 9 rounds with another member -- take it to the Bull Ring.
Make Rule Two be to include an "Invite List" of mention alerts (like @FCT @DTMB @catpaws) embedded in the OP for everyone to see. Can be anywhere in the Opening Post AFTER the Bold Red "Invite Only" warning.
Make Rule Three ---- any one additional rule that the OP desires to specify that does not violate the Site Wide or Zone3 rules.. If you WANT to make an additional rule -- place it near the TOP of the Opening Post after the red and bold "invite" required warning (see below).
You could still use the Structured Debate forum under the original Guidelines or use it for Invite Only threads.
Other guidance for members using the Structured Debate Forum under Invite Only rules would be:
- The first line of the OP MUST BE the following statement in Red Bold..
This is an Invite Only thread. If your member name does not appear in the alert call list -- DO NOT POST HERE -- do not even use the rating buttons on posts in this thread.
- simply and politely tell intruders the rules and ask them to leave. Then report them if they dont. Moderators will thread ban any intruders automatically. If it's chronic abuse, warnings and other sanctions may be applied.
- these threads WILL BE closed if members NOT on the Invite list are flamed or named in any way.. (Maybe some requested mod help for those that slip up once if someone REQUESTS a post deletion)
-- no material from these threads LEAVES those threads to be quoted elsewhere on the boards. This applies to both invited and uninvited members. Moderators should not MERGE or MOVE any threads out of or into the Structured Debate forum.
-- Moderation will NOT add members to the invite list or delete members from the invite list or recognize any additions NOT in the Opening Posts ----- so get it right in the Opening Post. Similarly Moderators will not eject invited members from an existing thread except for violations of the Invite Only rules. Live and Learn. Make another thread. And behave like a good guest if you want to be in Invite Only threads. How an OP decides how an invite list is created is SOLELY up to the person who creates the Opening Post.
-- if a person is alerted to one of your threads and requests in that thread that you DO NOT invite again, please respect that request. Who gets invites is solely up to the membership to sort out. But keep a list of those who DO NOT want to participate in the invite threads that you create.
- We're gonna start out with a limit of 12 invites per thread until everybody is familiar with the rules and bugs are shaken out of the rules. Moderation MAY increase that number in the future..
- Topic control is STILL in effect. So don't forget a specific Title and OP like any other Z2 or Z3 thread. These are discussion topics, not chat rooms. The purpose is to get better TOPICAL discussion. Make the Title and OP thematic or fairly narrow. Moderation will cut a LOT of slack on friendly personal banter -- but the TOPIC needs to be respected. Moderation may close if the topic is nowhere in sight.
Not liking the exposure of having ISIS open up a recruiting station in the dark spaces of USMB where not even the Mods can see thread or post counts or ANYTHING. It was set up WRONG with too many public options and we could never get it fixed. Couldn't even remove the 4 pot forums from the listings with identical names without a lot of Admin effort that some stoner accomplished one night. . It was a total SNAFU and was cluttering up the forum lists with genuine garbage and abandoned spaces. A big embarrassment as seen from tthe Home Page.
.
"Not liking the exposure of having ISIS open up a recruiting station in the dark spaces of USMB"
The probability of that happening is zero.
Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Why not make these Invite Only Threads invisible to those who are not Invited, that way not only do you not have to be bothered with getting involved to delete posts and thread ban those who are not Invited but insist on posting, also there would be no problem with the using of the ratings buttons as you cannot rate what you cannot see, you cannot rate or read what you do not know even exists. So the Invite Only Threads would only be visible to those Invited and also to all the Mods but nobody else.
As it is from your OP description etc IMHO these Invite Only Threads as stated are not going to work, if your intention is to restrict in your terms Mega trolls and Ultra partisan Battle Bots it will not work because the former will all still Funny EVERY POST and the latter probably will not want to be involved as it could all be too restricted in general for a full on Battle Bot situation. So based on this I vote No, if the threads were Invisible I would probably vote Yes for the reasons I explain in my paragraph one.
Frankly, don't have the best coupling with Admin and it's hard to make threads invisible to all but a CHANGING subset of the membership. Would need the software to RECOGNIZE an invite list to even do that. And I don't think the capability is there.
I have different peeps that I would invite to a thread on the Israel/Pali issues. Or an Enviro issue. Or a race issue thread. That flexibility is BETTER than having a fixed "group". The idea is to give ANY "upstairs" convo a private room for that thread. But only in ONE forum. The Structured Debate forum..
YesIs there currently a limit to the number of people you can include in a private message?
YesWill those not invited to a thread be able to view conversations in that thread?
Does it offer more opportunity for staff to moderate conversations between members than private messaging does?
Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Why is this option preferable to the private messaging option?
Is there currently a limit to the number of people you can include in a private message?
Will those not invited to a thread be able to view conversations in that thread?
Does it offer more opportunity for staff to moderate conversations between members than private messaging does?
.
Wow. Sounds really confusing a shitload of work for staff. Why not just put back social groups? Tis the same thing.USMB Mod Staff is preparing to roll out a new feature. This is a TRIAL, not a guarantee that it will work out. The success of this concept depends largely on the ability of our members to "self-moderate" themselves and cooperate with the rules for this feature. It is NOT open yet. THis is an opportunity to comment on the plan and the rules. The explanation here is LONG. So if you tl;dr it -- this feature is probably not gonna work for you..
The feature is having "Invite Only" threads. They will all reside in the Structured Debate forum for now. For those of you not familiar with the Struct Debate forum, it's a place where the OP can stipulate an ADDITIONAL 3 rules for the thread participants in addition to normal Zone2 moderation. You will be able to still use the ORIGINAL Struct Debate rules OR create an Invite Only thread that meets all the guidelines below.
The concept is that any member can start a thread on any topic that would be acceptable in Zone2 or Zone3 and choose 12 people to "invite in" for the discussion. Sorting out the invites and who are people you want and trust is all on you.. In the future, the number of invites may increase and I've tested that at LEAST 25 are possible.
Read the guidelines carefully. They are more complicated than other forums and we must get compliance on every one of them to make this work. I honestly believe this could be the most popular feature on USMB and give folks a break from being constantly on the front lines of a very nasty Amer. political divide while having to deal with Mega trolls and Ultra partisan Battle Bots. It's NOT a safe zone. It's NOT a "chat room" or clubhouse. These are topical discussions meant to promote more uninterrupted adult discussion.
Comments/suggestions are welcome -- but stick to discussing this feature and the rules.
Rules for Posting "Invite Only" Threads -------- Forum not opened yet !!!!
For an "Invite Only" thread in the Structured Debate Forum ---- where OPs have always been allowed to stipulate 3 additional rules of their own. Under an "Invite Only" format this will automatically adopt 2 rules automatically -- you need not specify these..
Make Rule One that Site Wide Rules apply and threads will be Zone3 moderated
In addition -->
-- flaming or mention of ANY MEMBER (including moderators) who is not in the Invite list is not allowed. Not even by pseudonames or pet names. You want to flame USMB members, don't whimp out. Take it to the Flame Zone where they can flame back. You want to go 9 rounds with another member -- take it to the Bull Ring.
Make Rule Two be to include an "Invite List" of mention alerts (like @FCT @DTMB @catpaws) embedded in the OP for everyone to see. Can be anywhere in the Opening Post AFTER the Bold Red "Invite Only" warning.
Make Rule Three ---- any one additional rule that the OP desires to specify that does not violate the Site Wide or Zone3 rules.. If you WANT to make an additional rule -- place it near the TOP of the Opening Post after the red and bold "invite" required warning (see below).
You could still use the Structured Debate forum under the original Guidelines or use it for Invite Only threads.
Other guidance for members using the Structured Debate Forum under Invite Only rules would be:
- The first line of the OP MUST BE the following statement in Red Bold..
This is an Invite Only thread. If your member name does not appear in the alert call list -- DO NOT POST HERE -- do not even use the rating buttons on posts in this thread.
- simply and politely tell intruders the rules and ask them to leave. Then report them if they dont. Moderators will thread ban any intruders automatically. If it's chronic abuse, warnings and other sanctions may be applied.
- these threads WILL BE closed if members NOT on the Invite list are flamed or named in any way.. (Maybe some requested mod help for those that slip up once if someone REQUESTS a post deletion)
-- no material from these threads LEAVES those threads to be quoted elsewhere on the boards. This applies to both invited and uninvited members. Moderators should not MERGE or MOVE any threads out of or into the Structured Debate forum.
-- Moderation will NOT add members to the invite list or delete members from the invite list or recognize any additions NOT in the Opening Posts ----- so get it right in the Opening Post. Similarly Moderators will not eject invited members from an existing thread except for violations of the Invite Only rules. Live and Learn. Make another thread. And behave like a good guest if you want to be in Invite Only threads. How an OP decides how an invite list is created is SOLELY up to the person who creates the Opening Post.
-- if a person is alerted to one of your threads and requests in that thread that you DO NOT invite again, please respect that request. Who gets invites is solely up to the membership to sort out. But keep a list of those who DO NOT want to participate in the invite threads that you create.
- We're gonna start out with a limit of 12 invites per thread until everybody is familiar with the rules and bugs are shaken out of the rules. Moderation MAY increase that number in the future..
- Topic control is STILL in effect. So don't forget a specific Title and OP like any other Z2 or Z3 thread. These are discussion topics, not chat rooms. The purpose is to get better TOPICAL discussion. Make the Title and OP thematic or fairly narrow. Moderation will cut a LOT of slack on friendly personal banter -- but the TOPIC needs to be respected. Moderation may close if the topic is nowhere in sight.
Not liking the exposure of having ISIS open up a recruiting station in the dark spaces of USMB where not even the Mods can see thread or post counts or ANYTHING. It was set up WRONG with too many public options and we could never get it fixed. Couldn't even remove the 4 pot forums from the listings with identical names without a lot of Admin effort that some stoner accomplished one night. . It was a total SNAFU and was cluttering up the forum lists with genuine garbage and abandoned spaces. A big embarrassment as seen from tthe Home Page.
.
"Not liking the exposure of having ISIS open up a recruiting station in the dark spaces of USMB"
The probability of that happening is zero.
How so? A bunch of new member register. Their profiles don't show any "recent activity" or post count but they sure are HERE A LOT. Where you think they MIGHT BE? There's a forum on motorcycle repair that no seems to know about. You SURE it's not an illegal activity?
Or Spammers that register socks but never seem to post. Are they ORGANIZING and educating each other in a Dark USMB "social group"???
Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Why is this option preferable to the private messaging option?
Is there currently a limit to the number of people you can include in a private message?
Will those not invited to a thread be able to view conversations in that thread?
Does it offer more opportunity for staff to moderate conversations between members than private messaging does?
.
damn! that's why i'm always broke.Lust sellsLust?I have a theory. That is my theory, it is mine and belongs to me, and I own it and what it is, too:
The USMB Hegemony is building a set of Zones that align with the Circles of Hell in Dante's Infeno.
Zone 4 is for Greedy Greedheads.
This of course means that:
Zone 1 is for PAGANS
Zone 2 is for those who are insane with Lust
Zone 3 is for Gluttons
Really, Zone 4 would be more aptly labelled Zone 5, 7 or 9, and Zone 3 as 6 or 8.
Just sayin'.
And remember, this is My Theory.
I'd have to think on that.....
I'd be more interested on how I could make a buck off it.....
You have it backward. Sex sells. Lust buys.
... Admit it -- Even YOU would be more comfortable and reasonable in a smaller, more cooperative group thread -- RIGHT?
Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Why is this option preferable to the private messaging option?
Is there currently a limit to the number of people you can include in a private message?
Will those not invited to a thread be able to view conversations in that thread?
Does it offer more opportunity for staff to moderate conversations between members than private messaging does?
.
You could do that. You don't have access to "ratings", And the search capabilities are worse for PMs. And they're all mixed in with your other "mail"... Besides, I've had private convos with MANY of the partisan Battle Bots in PM that were WONDERFUL. It's AMAZING.. How reasonable and moderate some of these people become when they are not ducking flame throwers and mortar fire. Admit it -- Even YOU would be more comfortable and reasonable in a smaller, more cooperative group thread -- RIGHT?
So if other members SEE more discussion and less sniping and flaming by monitoring these threads -- just MAYBE they'll try inviting in a wider circle than they thought was ever possible.
I had a favorite sociology teacher who was always saying that you learn more about people by shouting less and mostly listening.
Nope.Now I have a headache
Too complicated
Doesn’t provide any additional functions that you can get posting in a group
Suppose I wanted to invite a few people I don’t like to a thread just to tell them all to piss off; would this be a potential function of this new system?Why only twelve people?
Because it's a trial. If there is compliance and interest -- we would certainly open that number up at a later date.
Not everyone is gonna be interested in EVERY topic they are invited to and we want to cut down on the alerts that people receive..
Are these threads going to be moderated and if so why?
Because the object is to promote more moderate cooperative discussion. And to allow people to explore serious topics with folks they trust and choose without the ever-present interference of trolls and opposing zealots. If you want private discussions -- you can't beat PMs. If you LIKE the constant warfare, trolling and personal sniping in EVERY other USMB thread -- you probably wouldn't use it.
There's no reason why all these threads need to be echo chambers with like-minded people. Although they can be. One hope is that folks will find trusted members "of the other side" to bring in to balance discussions
My personal opinion is that these Invite Only would require VERY LITTLE if ANY moderation by USMB staff. Other than intruders who simply don't read OPs or don't know what Forum they are in.
Suppose I wanted to invite a few people I don’t like to a thread just to tell them all to piss off; would this be a potential function of this new system?
Nah. Doesn't matter where it is....the folks in there respect Foxfyre and each other enough to leave their weaponry at the door.I ain't here that much any more like I used to be anyway..so...sure. If people can behave in the Coffee Shop..no reason why they can't in other threads. I guess.The social groups caused more problems for moderation. Why not give this a chance? If it works, great, if it doesn’t it doesn’t.
Anyway...good luck.
The Coffee Shop is in The Lounge that is why there is better behaving, no politics, religion, arguing etc allowed in The Lounge, it is usually when politics and religion are the topic that things can go downhill.
