Protests in Syria

[BecauseIKnow]

Buddy. You claimed Israel was kicking everybody's ass.

That's not true, they were damaged a lot. Sure they might of won in some people's eyes.

America helped them with intelligence. Intelligence is the difference. The only reason hezbollah had any success was not for their weapons, their weapons are garbage, it's the intelligence Iran have them.

The Middle East doesn't have peaceful neighbors, you seem to overlook the British empire and what they did with the Middle East way back then.

We don't claim we are victims buddy. Every Muslim is different. I have an opinion on every conflict. Everything is different.

I don't like the way you look at it. Because its stupid.

 

[logical4u]

Buddy. You claimed Israel was kicking everybody's ass.

That's not true, they were damaged a lot. Sure they might of won in some people's eyes.

America helped them with intelligence. Intelligence is the difference. The only reason hezbollah had any success was not for their weapons, their weapons are garbage, it's the intelligence Iran have them.

The Middle East doesn't have peaceful neighbors, you seem to overlook the British empire and what they did with the Middle East way back then.

We don't claim we are victims buddy. Every Muslim is different. I have an opinion on every conflict. Everything is different.

I don't like the way you look at it. Because its stupid.

So, you agree that Israel was victorious, and kept the territories as a result of the Arab nations surrendering them?

Iran is supplying hezollah?

The British empire, are you serious? When was the last time Britan conquered a territory/nation?

Yes, every time you cry your beloved prophet was "blasphemed" (a term used for a god), furthering the belief that you worship a prophet instead of the Lord of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, and David.

Yes, we all have heard your opinions on "conflicts". Never have evidence or links, but opinions a plenty.

I noticed how you did not answer the questions...... again.

 

[BecauseIKnow]

Buddy. You claimed Israel was kicking everybody's ass.

That's not true, they were damaged a lot. Sure they might of won in some people's eyes.

America helped them with intelligence. Intelligence is the difference. The only reason hezbollah had any success was not for their weapons, their weapons are garbage, it's the intelligence Iran have them.

The Middle East doesn't have peaceful neighbors, you seem to overlook the British empire and what they did with the Middle East way back then.

We don't claim we are victims buddy. Every Muslim is different. I have an opinion on every conflict. Everything is different.

I don't like the way you look at it. Because its stupid.

So, you agree that Israel was victorious, and kept the territories as a result of the Arab nations surrendering them?

Iran is supplying hezollah?

The British empire, are you serious? When was the last time Britan conquered a territory/nation?

Yes, every time you cry your beloved prophet was "blasphemed" (a term used for a god), furthering the belief that you worship a prophet instead of the Lord of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, and David.

Yes, we all have heard your opinions on "conflicts". Never have evidence or links, but opinions a plenty.

I noticed how you did not answer the questions...... again.

Israel attacked. That's the difference. Not the Arabs.

It's funny you expect someone that is willing to speak to a nazi.

You've done nothing besides ramble and rant.

Your asked why middle eastern nations should be armed. Just like every other country in the world is armed and the British were a reason.

Don't give us that bs that you ask questions.

I just see your typical poetic Christian nonsense, and you trying to get your beliefs down everyone's throat.

Fuck off troll.

 

[logical4u]

Buddy. You claimed Israel was kicking everybody's ass.

That's not true, they were damaged a lot. Sure they might of won in some people's eyes.

America helped them with intelligence. Intelligence is the difference. The only reason hezbollah had any success was not for their weapons, their weapons are garbage, it's the intelligence Iran have them.

The Middle East doesn't have peaceful neighbors, you seem to overlook the British empire and what they did with the Middle East way back then.

We don't claim we are victims buddy. Every Muslim is different. I have an opinion on every conflict. Everything is different.

I don't like the way you look at it. Because its stupid.

So, you agree that Israel was victorious, and kept the territories as a result of the Arab nations surrendering them?

Iran is supplying hezollah?

The British empire, are you serious? When was the last time Britan conquered a territory/nation?

Yes, every time you cry your beloved prophet was "blasphemed" (a term used for a god), furthering the belief that you worship a prophet instead of the Lord of Abraham, Issac, Jacob, and David.

Yes, we all have heard your opinions on "conflicts". Never have evidence or links, but opinions a plenty.

I noticed how you did not answer the questions...... again.

Israel attacked. That's the difference. Not the Arabs.

It's funny you expect someone that is willing to speak to a nazi.

You've done nothing besides ramble and rant.

Your asked why middle eastern nations should be armed. Just like every other country in the world is armed and the British were a reason.

Don't give us that bs that you ask questions.

I just see your typical poetic Christian nonsense, and you trying to get your beliefs down everyone's throat.

Fuck off troll.

"Why did Israel use military power in '67 (this will require 2 brain cells)?
Where did I say America was giving Israel intelligence. I did not. But you don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Please provide "proof" that I hate muslims. I have never stated that.

What specifically was "stupid"?

Elaborate on why these countries need weapons.
In Europe, Asia, Africa, countries have had long standing rivalries with neighbors.
In the ME, islam rules (the peaceful religion), and between "neighbors", there should be no need for weapons (because islam brings peace, remember?). Are there "non-believers" attacking any country in the ME? Why does the ME need weapons? Islam is more of a socialist gov't which means that people do not have the right to property, they are not allowed to defend themselves (especially women). Why do they need weapons?

Again, we are speaking of the ME, muslims are the largest percentage of the population, and work hard to eliminate or silence any "non-believer", who holds the responsibilites, INCAS? No, it would be muslims. You just don't want to deal with the truth and evidence that is blatant in the ME: islam results in deceit, destruction, death, dust and decay.

Start a thread on the Tlinget Haida Americans, and if it is interesting, I will join that thread. People are tired of the muslims claiming they are victims when everywhere you look, they are the AGGRESSORS and TROUBLE MAKERS."

You are admitting that the ME islamists are blood thirsty savages? That they cannot have peace among themselves?

Tell me, if you were surrounded by at least five men and they were ready to "kick your ass", would you throw the first punch (or would you wait until they attacked before you defended yourself)?

 

[BecauseIKnow]

That's all talk prep boy. They got a green light to expand.

Now you're fooling around. And I can't change your opinion.

No, I disagree, it depends on which group. I dislike some.

That doesn't change the fact Palestinian resistance groups are resistance groups.

Whether you like it or not.

That never happened either.

It's your opinion on Islam. It's also an odd way how you think everything is a result of Islam.

So logical.

We don't care for your opinion or other Muslim haters opinions.

Quit obeying your master jews like your life depends on it homo. Go out and explore your real self.m

 

[BecauseIKnow]

Terry jones is that you?

 

[BecauseIKnow]

Btw, your username and knowledge don't go together. Your logical up your ass

 

[BecauseIKnow]

Still more preaching.

Learn some more pick up lines Sherlock

You can find out more at jihad watch

 

[mememe]

Yesterday Ankara (that's in Turkey) proposed a new tripartite format: Turkey, Russia and Iran to resolve the crisis in Syria.

Moscow supports this initiative.

 

[High_Gravity]

Syria Car Bomb Kills At Least 50 Pro-Government Fighters, Activists Say

BEIRUT -- A Syrian activist group says a suicide car bomber has killed more than 50 Syrian soldiers and pro-government gunmen.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says the attack in the village of Ziyara in the central province of Hama was carried out by Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaida-inspired Islamic militant group.

The death toll could not be independently verified.

State-run news agency SANA said the blast occurred outside a state-run development agency. It said Monday's blast caused deaths but gave no figure.

The Observatory also reported that an air raid on the northern town of Harem killed at least 20 rebels. It said a rebel commander was seriously wounded in the raid.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

Rebels and government troops backed by fighters from a Palestinian radical group fought in the capital Damascus on Monday in some of the most intense fighting in the city in nearly three months, activists said.

In northern Syria, rare fighting broke out between rival rebel groups for control of a border crossing with Turkey, according to an opposition figure.

The fighting in Damascus is some of the worst since July, when rebels took over several neighborhoods in the capital in a striking attack. Within days, a regime counterattack pushed the rebels out of Damascus and recaptured the areas. Shortly after those battles, rebels moved on Syria's largest city, Aleppo, and it has become a major front in the civil war since then.

The attacks on Syria's two main cities since summer have demonstrated new organization and capabilities of rebel forces as well as a determination to press their uprising despite the deaths of more than 36,000 people in fighting over the last 19 months.

Syria Car Bomb Kills At Least 50 Pro-Government Fighters, Activists Say

 

[logical4u]

That's all talk prep boy. They got a green light to expand.

Now you're fooling around. And I can't change your opinion.

No, I disagree, it depends on which group. I dislike some.

That doesn't change the fact Palestinian resistance groups are resistance groups.

Whether you like it or not.

That never happened either.

It's your opinion on Islam. It's also an odd way how you think everything is a result of Islam.

So logical.

We don't care for your opinion or other Muslim haters opinions.

Quit obeying your master jews like your life depends on it homo. Go out and explore your real self.m

gibberish?

 

[logical4u]

Yesterday Ankara (that's in Turkey) proposed a new tripartite format: Turkey, Russia and Iran to resolve the crisis in Syria.

Moscow supports this initiative.

rutt roe raggy!

 

[logical4u]

Syria Car Bomb Kills At Least 50 Pro-Government Fighters, Activists Say

BEIRUT -- A Syrian activist group says a suicide car bomber has killed more than 50 Syrian soldiers and pro-government gunmen.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says the attack in the village of Ziyara in the central province of Hama was carried out by Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaida-inspired Islamic militant group.

The death toll could not be independently verified.

State-run news agency SANA said the blast occurred outside a state-run development agency. It said Monday's blast caused deaths but gave no figure.

The Observatory also reported that an air raid on the northern town of Harem killed at least 20 rebels. It said a rebel commander was seriously wounded in the raid.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

Rebels and government troops backed by fighters from a Palestinian radical group fought in the capital Damascus on Monday in some of the most intense fighting in the city in nearly three months, activists said.

In northern Syria, rare fighting broke out between rival rebel groups for control of a border crossing with Turkey, according to an opposition figure.

The fighting in Damascus is some of the worst since July, when rebels took over several neighborhoods in the capital in a striking attack. Within days, a regime counterattack pushed the rebels out of Damascus and recaptured the areas. Shortly after those battles, rebels moved on Syria's largest city, Aleppo, and it has become a major front in the civil war since then.

The attacks on Syria's two main cities since summer have demonstrated new organization and capabilities of rebel forces as well as a determination to press their uprising despite the deaths of more than 36,000 people in fighting over the last 19 months.

Syria Car Bomb Kills At Least 50 Pro-Government Fighters, Activists Say

and we are discovering that Libya's Bengazi and Syria may be linked by the State Dept....

 

[High_Gravity]

Britain floats safe exit for Syria's Assad

JEDDAH/AMMAN (Reuters) - Britain floated the notion on Tuesday of Syria's President Bashar al-Assad leaving power with immunity from prosecution while the opposition said at least 100 more people were killed in the country's 19-month revolt.

"Anything, anything, to get that man out of the country and to have a safe transition in Syria," British Prime Minister David Cameron told Al Arabiya news network in Abu Dhabi before flying to Saudi Arabia.

Peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi warned that Syria, where some 32,000 people have died in the revolt against Assad, could end up a collapsed state like Somalia, prey to warlords and militias.

More than 100 people were killed across the country on Tuesday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

Among them was the brother of Syria's parliament speaker, assassinated by gunmen in Damascus, state television said. He was the latest victim in a deadly campaign against perceived Assad supporters and their families.

Air strikes killed 17 people, including women and children, in the Damascus suburb of Kfar Batna, according to the Syrian Observatory, an opposition watchdog based in Britain.

Video footage of the raid's aftermath, which could not be verified, showed a toddler with a severed head and the torso of a young man, his head and limbs gathered near him by rescuers.

Insurgents killed 12 soldiers and wounded 20 in an attack on a convoy of off-road vehicles in the northern province of Idlib.

Air strikes and artillery barrages unleashed by the Syrian military in the last few weeks have devastated whole districts of the capital, as well as parts of towns and cities elsewhere.

Yet, for all their firepower, Assad's forces seem no closer to crushing their lightly armed opponents, who in turn have so far proved unable to topple the Syrian leader.

Britain floats safe exit for Syria's Assad - Yahoo! News

 

[mememe]

Britain floats safe exit for Syria's Assad


On one hand Cameron offered guarantees of personal safety if Assad should leave.

On the other hand, Cameron warned that the West does not guarantee from future persecutions.

In other words, Cameron emphasised, that any Western "guarantees" are not worth a penny.

 

[High_Gravity]

Syrian president says he will not leave country

BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian President Bashar Assad vowed defiantly to "live and die" in Syria, saying in an interview broadcast Thursday that he will never flee his country despite the bloody, 19-month-old uprising against him.

The broadcast comes two days after British Prime Minister David Cameron suggested that Assad could be allowed safe passage out of the country if that would guarantee an end to the civil war, which activists estimate has killed more than 36,000 people.

"I am not a puppet, I was not made by the West for me to go to the West or any other country," Assad, 47, said in the interview with the English-language Russia Today TV. He spoke in English and excerpts of the interview were posted on the station's website Thursday with an Arabic voiceover.

"I am Syrian, I am made in Syria, and I will live and die in Syria," he said.

Assad also warned against foreign military intervention at a time when the West is taking steps to boost the opposition.

"I don't think the West is headed in this direction. But if it does, nobody can predict the consequences," he told the station. The full interview will be broadcast on Friday, the station said.

The excerpts show Assad casually talking and later walking with RT's reporter outside a house, wearing a gray suit and tie. It was not clear where the interview took place.

The uprising against Assad's regime began as mostly peaceful protests in March last year but quickly morphed into a civil war. The fighting has taken on grim sectarian tones, with the predominantly Sunni rebels battling government forces loyal to a regime dominated by minority Alawites, an offshoot of Shiite Islam.

Syrian president says he will not leave country - Yahoo! News

 

[mememe]

Israel fired Spike NLOS into Syria.

Well, presidential elections are over, now US feel free to go after Syria in earnest...

 

[theliq]

Protest spreads to new southern Syrian village




Protest spreads to new southern Syrian village - Yahoo! News

Do you think they are getting tired of Sharia?

Who knows, I don't think the Assad regime is religious though, Bashars dad put down a religious uprising in Syria and they allow drinking and night clubs there, I don't think Syria is that religious to be honest.

Only when it suit them Grav.steve

 

[High_Gravity]

Syria’s New Opposition Wins Western Backing, But What About Western Weapons?

Syria‘s new opposition leadership structure announced in Qatar on Sunday could mark a turning point in the stalemated 20-month old rebellion against the Assad regime. But it could just as easily prove to be another chimerical Western attempt to stand up a friendly regime for an Arab country in transition. That’s because the impetus for the new National Coalition for Revolutionary Forces and the Syrian Opposition has come from foreign powers rather than from the grassroots of the rebellion, and its authority on the ground, particularly with the hundreds of autonomous militia groups, is more of an aspiration than an established fact at this stage.

“It’s obviously a great step forward for the West and the Syrian opposition,” says Joshua Landis, a Syria specialist at the University of Oklahoma. “This group has great purchase among upper-class urban Sunnis, particularly those who have spent a lot of time in the West. But the key question will be whether or not it is able to unify rebel military groups on the ground, which haven’t been particularly involved in this process.”

The National Coalition is a product of Western and Arab backers — exasperated by the failure of their previous favorite, the Syrian National Council, to overcome crippling factional disputes, much less establish any traction on the ground — twisting the arms of exile-based opposition groups to accept a new, more representative leadership structure as the condition for continued foreign backing. The Gulf Cooperation Council, representing Saudi Arabia, Qatar and four of their neighbors, on Monday recognized the new group as “the legitimate representative of the Syrian people.” The new opposition group, which includes leadership spots reserved for minorities and for representatives of provincial revolutionary committees on the ground, expects immediate recognition as the legitimate government of Syria, and also military assistance to rebel fighters. But before the U.S. and other Western powers follow the lead of the Saudis and Qataris, they may expect the new group to provide credible evidence of its authority on the ground. And that may be the tricky part of the second phase of the plan to reorganize the Syrian opposition.

Recognizing the National Coalition as a government-in-exile could be used as a means of putting pressure on Assad’s foreign backers, chiefly Russia, to allow more U.N. pressure on Assad. Moscow has argued that the rebellion represents chaos and that there’s no legitimate alternative to dealing with Assad. It would also become the basis for a ramped up aid effort, particularly in parts of Syria already in rebel hands. And a “provisional government” would in theory become the sole channel through which military aid would be channeled to rebel fighters — until now, different foreign backers tend to direct such resources to their preferred Syrian allies, and even then, not of qualitatively or quantitatively sufficient measure to tip the military balance against Assad.

Read more: Syria’s New Opposition Wins Western Backing, But What About Western Weapons? | TIME.com

 

[mememe]

This is Syrian town Homs BEFORE "civilised" US, UK, France decided to "liberate" it

And this is Homs NOW, thanks to US, UK, France who arm, finance, support and direct terrorist activities of the "liberators"