🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Psaki claims WH has ‘no confirmation’ Hunter Biden got $3.5M from Russia, still won’t say if he divested from China

There is no such thing
It don’t count till all the votes are counted
Actually Trump was in the lead. But that's no different than in other elections when the polls in California are still open, and they show who's ahead.
Then when the California vote comes in, they start predicting a winner.
They don't declare a winner until enough votes are counted, that the winning lead is so large, it can't be changed by the uncounted votes.
 
Bullshit, once all the polls are closed they start reporting the counts.
And they don't give a final vote count, until all the votes are counted.
That's why the news reports: With 60% of the precincts reporting ......

And based on that, many candidates may take an early lead, only to have it reversed when the larger population centers (who have more votes to count, so it takes longer) report their numbers.
 
I don't know but they did, they were getting something for it and hunter is a bigger fuck up than his daddy.
Now you admit they kept Hunter on the board, for a reason other than his influence over the vice president.

We're making progress.

Now if we can get past your delusion that Burisma knew in 2017 who was going to win the 2020 election, we can wrap this up.
 
Actually Trump was in the lead. But that's no different than in other elections when the polls in California are still open, and they show who's ahead.
Then when the California vote comes in, they start predicting a winner.
They don't declare a winner until enough votes are counted, that the winning lead is so large, it can't be changed by the uncounted votes.
It’s not over till it’s over

Trump voters wanted to declare it over at 10PM on election night
 
It’s not over till it’s over

Trump voters wanted to declare it over at 10PM on election night

Election specialists actually reported what happened, before it happened. They said that based n the democratic and republican primary elections, with republicans voting 70% in person, and 30% by mail, and democrats voting 30% in person and 70% by mail, that the early vote would show a large lead for Trump, and then as the mail-in votes got counted, the election would tighten, or even reverse.

Which is exactly what happened.

They even predicted that Trump would use that narrative to claim victory before all the votes got counted.
 
And you refuse to think Putin controlling Trump building Trump Tower Moscow didn't put Trump squarely in Putin's pocket?
There is no Trump Tower Moscow, and if you expect to bribe Putin with a penthouse apartment, it better be worth at least a billion dollars.

If you think a free penthouse would influence Putin, you really don't get how wealthy he is.

It was a branding deal that was abandoned after the dem emails were hacked and dems rediscovered their inner cold-warriors. When the Trump org began looking at the idea in 2013, Russia was not under any sanctions or even criticism from the Obama administration. Obama had promised to have "more flexibility" with Putin a just few months earlier.
<snip>

The Mueller report made clear that its obstruction of justice inquiry focused on President Trump’s conduct toward law enforcement officials overseeing investigations into the Trump-Russia allegations. The report provided the blueprint for a potential indictment for obstruction.

Indeed, it was over 1,000 former prosecutors who reached the conclusion that “the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
In other words, inferences. For every instance where they could interpret obstruction, there is an explanation that does not involve obstruction.

"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

That volume was written by Andrew Weismann, who is a total sleazebag and guilty of prosecutorial misconduct himself. Mueller was a figurehead, he had no part of the actual probe. In his testimony, he was almost as out of it as Biden. He said he didn't even know who Fusion GPS was. Was that "a thorough investigation" when you haven't even examined the source of the allegations you are supposed to be investigating?

And there is really nothing to obstruct when the investgation is based on a fraudulent narrative to begin with...
 
Last edited:
Those are undisputed payment records RightFlinger. Keep up or stop wasting screenspace.
Nothing illegal

You are allowed to send money to investment firms and those firms are entitled to commissions.

Show where Hunter failed to declare the payments and you may have a case

You still got nothing against Our President
 
Nothing illegal

You are allowed to send money to investment firms and those firms are entitled to commissions.

Show where Hunter failed to declare the payments and you may have a case

You still got nothing against Our President
I’m counting on congressional representatives to thoroughly investigate after Democrats lose the house later this year. After Democrats lose the presidential election in 2024, I’ll get back with you then rightflinger.
 
I’m counting on congressional representatives to thoroughly investigate after Democrats lose the house later this year. After Democrats lose the presidential election in 2024, I’ll get back with you then rightflinger.
No question about that

Republicans taking the House will result in them investigating every wild RW Conspiracy Theory
 
How about some evidence. You have no facts to check. It is none of your business what a private citizen is doing.
Ya all are private citizens. Then, why did MSM keep bringing up all Trump's records before he moved into WH? Anyway, WH and Biden's family need to clear the air is because he was the VP. You may not care, but a lot of people care.
 
Ya all are private citizens. Then, why did MSM keep bringing up all Trump's records before he moved into WH? Anyway, WH and Biden's family need to clear the air is because he was the VP. You may not care, but a lot of people care.
No they don't. They just want scandal, Whether it's real or not.
 
The Biden crime family was all over the world selling out America for personal gain while the Dem news media denied and deflected and spewed Dem propaganda.
And yet, none of that is true. You are a liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top