Public wary about sequester cuts, but Obama in stronger political position than GOP

[DaGoose]

the sequester is a bonus for the Republicans ... Obama lost that one when he gave them their tax cuts without stopping the sequester at the same time.

and the Republicans are running with theirs and turning their backs on the country.

So spending us into bankruptcy is what's best for the country?

Yeah, right, asshole.

Do you give a crap about saddling your children and grandchildren with another $20,000 to $30,000 in debt each? Of course you don't. You're a Democrap. All you care about is keeping those welfare checks coming.

Like you gave two shits about it when your hero Bush was POTUS. You know, the one who put two wars on credit cards and gave out those stupid tax cuts like they were candy.

Yesterday you even tried to fake concern over teachers, cops and firefighters. You're hypocrisy is amazing.

.

 

[EriktheRed]

Despite those findings, a majority still supports Congress moving ahead with either the current cuts or a plan containing even more cuts as a way to reduce the deficit, suggesting the public’s general appetite for reducing spending.

How does that put Obama in a "stronger position" when he has made it perfectly crystal clear that he opposes any cuts of any kind?

You're and your article are trying to blow smoke up our asses.

Because your heroes in the "Loyal Opposition" are on track to get most of the blame for whatever negative fallout comes from it.

That's why the Speaker's out there saying the Prez and the Senate have to "get off their asses and do something". He's got too many fuckin' nutbags like you in the House to stop this from happening and he knows his side is gonna get burned in the arena of public opinion if these cuts happen.

 

[CaGOPatriot]

Obama refuses to face facts that his experiment in socialism is a failure. Socialism has never worked.

 

[Rinata]