- Thread starter
- #121
[
Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.
Evidence for what? There are plenty of peer reviewed published papers that provide evidence that the climate is changing....but no one is disputing that. Everyone knows that the climate changes.
What there isn't is a single peer reviewed published paper in which the hypothetical warming caused by our activities is measured, quantified, and blamed on so called greenhouse gasses...not a single one....
So there is evidence that the climate changes...big deal...it isn't as if you need to spend much money to figure that one out...but no observed, measured evidence whatsoever that we are causing any change at all.
Then what the fuck is this?