Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you claim Saddam wasn't supporting terrorists fleeing Afghanistan.
You claim Saddam didn't start a war with Kuwait and that was still on hold with a UN mandate that he allow open inspections of his country.
You claim Saddam wasn't paying for terrorists to attack our friend, Israel.
Saddam killed more people than Qadaffi, dumbass. He killed more Americans than Qadaffi.
Liberal trash like you just invent history to fit your fucked up mind and agenda.
So you support our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan....
I fully supported the invasion of Afghanistan.
That should have been the beginning and end to the "war on terrorism" and it should have ended with the death of Bin Laden.
There was no reason to attack Iraq. Al Qaeda had little or nothing to do with Saddam Hussien. I am pretty sure they made contact but like most dictators, they have little use for terrorists. Eventually what winds up happening is they turn against you.
Killing bin Laden happened because it was expedient now. It didn't happen before because it wasn't expedient. We needed to destroy AQ, not bin Laden. Once the Allies had bitchslapped AQ back to the stone age, killing bin Laden became a good thing. People really should learn to think beyond what the media and the politicians say.
victor go the spoils....Now the GOP is playing defense and cry babies over it.
Just like the left did when Bush caught Saddam....
Thats IF this story is true.
The 'victors' in this instance are the Libyan people.... not your fucking Messiah, you moron. Honestly, "you people" (the morons of the left) never tire of trying to steal what belongs to other people.
Actually my opinion is we never should have been there, but in the game of politics victory goes the spoils.
But im sure you whined your little twat off when bush caught saddam.
Could not give a rat's ass what your "opinion" is. We are not the 'victors', the Libyan people are.
So you claim Saddam wasn't supporting terrorists fleeing Afghanistan.
You claim Saddam didn't start a war with Kuwait and that was still on hold with a UN mandate that he allow open inspections of his country.
You claim Saddam wasn't paying for terrorists to attack our friend, Israel.
Saddam killed more people than Qadaffi, dumbass. He killed more Americans than Qadaffi.
Liberal trash like you just invent history to fit your fucked up mind and agenda.
You've got a terrible recollection of anything. That's probably because you only visit right wing propaganda sites.
Saddam, who was encouraged by the United States to enter into a war with Iran, did attack Kuwait. He did so because Iraq had some heavy debts to Kuwait who were making some very big threats. That and they wanted a port city. Hussien appraised April Glaspie of the situation and she essentially green lighted the whole thing. However, Iraq went further into Kuwait then Glaspie "thought" he would. That's why Iraq got into trouble for that.
The rest of what you have here is conflation and at best ridiculous.
There was no reason to commit the war crime known as the invasion and conquering of Iraq.
Idiot.
Could not give a rat's ass what your "opinion" is. We are not the 'victors', the Libyan people are.
If Gaddafi dies as a result of American actions..we will be the victors.
It will send a very clear message to every would be terrorist would fate awaits them if they kill Americans.
And that book "Liberal Fascism" is "absolute drivel" ( the Economist, and everyone else), as well as everything you say. Turn off the BS, Rush/Beck/Foxbot.
Oh, it was ok for Saddam to invade Kuwait over the debt he couldn't pay back.
Tell that to the people he killed and raped.
You are an idiot posting on this website because you are not allowed to go outside and play in the road anymore.
Iraq will be a better place to visit in 10 years than Libya, mark my words dumbfuck. Libya will be a terrorist launching pad into southern Europe and into western Africa.
Go away tool.
Could not give a rat's ass what your "opinion" is. We are not the 'victors', the Libyan people are.
If Gaddafi dies as a result of American actions..we will be the victors.
It will send a very clear message to every would be terrorist would fate awaits them if they kill Americans.
What if he dies as a result of French actions? We are part of NATO, they are part of NATO, so would that count?
Personally, I think y'all are getting a tad overly emotional about this whole thing. Sure, Gaddafi deserves to die because of Lockerbie. But the victors will still be the Libyans - it's their country.
Actually my opinion is we never should have been there, but in the game of politics victory goes the spoils.
But im sure you whined your little twat off when bush caught saddam.
Could not give a rat's ass what your "opinion" is. We are not the 'victors', the Libyan people are.
And.... Bush didn't 'catch' Saddam. That was the Military. idiot.
Of course you dont, because it males you look like a moron for assuming tuna twat.
Ah the military..didnt stop bush did it.
Could not give a rat's ass what your "opinion" is. We are not the 'victors', the Libyan people are.
If Gaddafi dies as a result of American actions..we will be the victors.
It will send a very clear message to every would be terrorist would fate awaits them if they kill Americans.
talk about history challenged....
Everything Saddam did to us was a result of Ronnie Raygun's STUPID adventurism, covert BS, and basic idiocy. His legacy is Bush's stupidest wars ever, and the collapse of our economy due to VOODOO deregulation and pandering to the rich. Oh, and all these brainwashed Rush/Fox/Pub Dupes. Pffft!!
