Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First off, don't assume I am on any "side." Secondly, it breaks down when no one ever discusses the worst-case scenario if we do nothing (the risk) and the solutions have NOTHING to do with the alleged problem.It breaks down when my side realizes that your side can't understand shit.
Assuming the science on whether humans are causing warming is settled (it's not), the REAL solution is to reduce the population down to about 2 billion people. That REAL solution will not fly, so what else do you have?
the solutions suggested to fight global warming have nothing to do with rising temperatures.
We obviously don't need this much CO2, since the Earth had 225ppm for quite some time.You & your denier buddies claim CO2 is not a pollutant.Firstly, climate denial is a serious issue only in the US, so when you say 60 percent of humans. You mean only Republicans,who aren't even 60 percent of the US.Is your goal to stop humans from polluting our air and water?
If yes, why isn't that enough? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate in order to fight pollution?
If you were out there fighting pollution, 99% of humans would support your fight. But when you try to claim that pollution is changing the climate you lose 60% of the supporters.
Can someone explain?
Secondly. If I accept your premise, then I have to ask why would you reject clean air and water because you don't agree on climate change? Something that is being done by your party as we speak. Coal polutes the air it creates smog yet you accept Trump promoting it. Why if you are for clean air?
see, you still don't get it. I fully support and demand that we stop polluting air and water. You don't need to make climate claims in order to get the vast majority of humans to support those efforts.
Why should we lie because your ilk is stupid?
Because we need CO2 to live..and you call us the stupid one?
Don't need to provide a solution to prove there's a problem, thank you.Please fill in the blanks:
If we do nothing about climate change _____________ will happen.
The solution to prevent _______________ from happening is ________________.
Thank you.
That's the only conclusion I can reach without a better explanation.Correct - they are 100% about left wing liars obsessed with stealing from the US taxpayer
All this debate and no talk about the worst-case scenario and the solution to prevent it.
It goes here every time.
Well, then, cryuto, you and your own money can pony up to reduce that which
1. isn't warming anything
2. has nothing to do with the beginning and ending of ice ages
3. doesn't affect sea levels
4. doesn't affect canes
5. doesn't move the tectonic plates
All this debate and no talk about the worst-case scenario and the solution to prevent it.
It goes here every time.
So, what are you bitching about if there is no solution?Don't need to provide a solution to prove there's a problem, thank you.
You & your denier buddies claim CO2 is not a pollutant.Firstly, climate denial is a serious issue only in the US, so when you say 60 percent of humans. You mean only Republicans,who aren't even 60 percent of the US.Is your goal to stop humans from polluting our air and water?
If yes, why isn't that enough? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate in order to fight pollution?
If you were out there fighting pollution, 99% of humans would support your fight. But when you try to claim that pollution is changing the climate you lose 60% of the supporters.
Can someone explain?
Secondly. If I accept your premise, then I have to ask why would you reject clean air and water because you don't agree on climate change? Something that is being done by your party as we speak. Coal polutes the air it creates smog yet you accept Trump promoting it. Why if you are for clean air?
see, you still don't get it. I fully support and demand that we stop polluting air and water. You don't need to make climate claims in order to get the vast majority of humans to support those efforts.
Why should we lie because your ilk is stupid?
Because we need CO2 to live..and you call us the stupid one?
we just need to prepare for the coming changes
OK....
90% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Antarctica
7% of Earth ice on LAND MASS Greenland
97% of Earth ice on the two land masses closest to an Earth pole... and land MOVES....
So what really causes the Earth's climate to change?
How much land is by the poles... during Jurassic, there were two polar OCEANS.... WARM EARTH parameter....
Here's a good clue. Earth is like a room with two air conditioning units, Arctic and Antarctic, each with settings 0-off and 10=maxCOOL.
Right now, the Arctic AC is set at 1 and the Antarctic AC is set at 9. The Antarctic circle is on average 50F cooler than the Arctic, and it puts 9 times the ice into the oceans vs the Arctic, some 46 times the H2o the Mississippi puts in the Gulf...
The flaw with your statement is the fact that 54 million years ago was when the Earth was the hottest and by then Antarctica had moved mostly over the south Pole.
How are they the problem? I thought the problem was too much CO2 in the atmosphere.No, the problem is the Big Oil companies, and they will pay.
All this debate and no talk about the worst-case scenario and the solution to prevent it.
It goes here every time.
Too late to prevent it, we just need to prepare for the coming changes
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
You & your denier buddies claim CO2 is not a pollutant.Firstly, climate denial is a serious issue only in the US, so when you say 60 percent of humans. You mean only Republicans,who aren't even 60 percent of the US.Is your goal to stop humans from polluting our air and water?
If yes, why isn't that enough? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate in order to fight pollution?
If you were out there fighting pollution, 99% of humans would support your fight. But when you try to claim that pollution is changing the climate you lose 60% of the supporters.
Can someone explain?
Secondly. If I accept your premise, then I have to ask why would you reject clean air and water because you don't agree on climate change? Something that is being done by your party as we speak. Coal polutes the air it creates smog yet you accept Trump promoting it. Why if you are for clean air?
see, you still don't get it. I fully support and demand that we stop polluting air and water. You don't need to make climate claims in order to get the vast majority of humans to support those efforts.
Why should we lie because your ilk is stupid?
Because we need CO2 to live..and you call us the stupid one?
Okay. By doing what?Too late to prevent it, we just need to prepare for the coming changes
