Oddball
Unobtanium Member
They would if a GOP president was proposing them....Or did you miss little Ricky's excuse-a-thon last night?Yep except that I don't have a candidate. And you can neg rep me until the cows come home and accuse me of all sorts of things but I won't change my mind that the welfare of country comes ahead of anybody's ideology, partisanship, or candidate.
So, I'll do the asking again; what is the differences you see between the GOP candidates and Obama? Is this just an "anyone but Obama" plea?
Can you make the case for any of the others that could sway a RP supporter to vote for a GOP candidate?
The GOP candidates would be less likely to break so many pledges they are making during the campaign.
The GOP candidates would be far less likely to promise to not approve any earmarks and then go against that pledge the very first appropriations bill signed into law.
The GOP candidates would never have passed anything as unconstitutional as Obamacare.
The GOP candidates would never have passed that stimulus package.
The GOP candidates would not have seized major auto manufacturers and turned them over to union ownership.
The GOP candidates would not be clamoring for still more government spending in the face of trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see
The GOP candidates would not go three years without submitting a budget for Congress to consider.
That includes ALL the GOP candidates.
Shall I go on? I could. . . .but I think you get my drift.
Do any of them have the balls or ability to really rachet back the size and scope of government ? I don't know. But even if they don't, they will not do the damage that a Barack Obama has done and is almost certain to do even more of if he is re-elecvted.
According to him, you gotta "take one for the team".
Last edited: