Question on the Mueller investigation timeline

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,965
1,870
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.
 
With benghazi they hammered and hammered got no where, Mueller is trying to be as careful as possible but those indictments was a joke, him putting up commey was a joke last year .. the guy really needs something special
 
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.



Laughing my ass off. Now the snowflakes are having trouble trying to figure out which will help them the most, keep the investigation going through the election or lay low as a political strategy.

This should be in the satire forum.
 
The attorneys for the Russians he's charging have arrived, demanding discovery and access to his documentation.

Could get interesting.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
The attorneys for the Russians he's charging have arrived, demanding discovery and access to his documentation.

Could get interesting.


"have arrived" from where?

....AND, will these attorneys counsel with those other attorneys that have for decades represented GITMO detainees about accessing documentation?

BTW...answer the fucking question posed in the O/P or start your own thread.
 
The attorneys for the Russians he's charging have arrived, demanding discovery and access to his documentation.

Could get interesting.


"have arrived" from where?

....AND, will these attorneys counsel with those other attorneys that have for decades represented GITMO detainees about accessing documentation?

BTW...answer the fucking question posed in the O/P or start your own thread.

1) Their attorney's office.

2) Not likely.

3) I understand there are statutes restricting interference with elections in these cases, but I have not researched it. Have at it.
 
Mueller in 2068 saying 'any day now'
image.jpeg
 
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.
Mueller can’t prove collusion
The Russians told him let’s get it on
Good luck with your boy
 
The attorneys for the Russians he's charging have arrived, demanding discovery and access to his documentation.

Could get interesting.


"have arrived" from where?

....AND, will these attorneys counsel with those other attorneys that have for decades represented GITMO detainees about accessing documentation?

BTW...answer the fucking question posed in the O/P or start your own thread.

1) Their attorney's office.

2) Not likely.

3) I understand there are statutes restricting interference with elections in these cases, but I have not researched it. Have at it.
Looks like they took their best defense from Trump: the, "we do it, too!" defense.
 
3) I understand there are statutes restricting interference with elections in these cases, but I have not researched it. Have at it.


Don't bother researching any of your bullshit.......

Since the average length of an investigation by a special counsel is over 900 days, do you think any elections cycles are crossed over that period of time? ......Yes or No?


upload_2018-5-10_22-3-0.png
 
That's not research. That's cutting and pasting someone's graph.

There may well be statutes concerning elections.
 
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.
Mueller can’t prove collusion
The Russians told him let’s get it on
Good luck with your boy
Russia interfering with our election does not require collusion to be breaking our laws....
 
Special Counsel should keep the investigation going until they've completed it...if it's before fine, if it's after fine.
 
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.
Mueller can’t prove collusion
The Russians told him let’s get it on
Good luck with your boy
Russia interfering with our election does not require collusion to be breaking our laws....
Produce the evidence
The Russians “want” their day in court.
 
It is rumored that the Mueller investigation will (or should) be halted this summer, so as not to appear that the investigation represent a negative impact on the upcoming midterm election cycle for GOPers.
(Of course the investigation would resume AFTER the election.)

So, the question is a simple one: Should Mueller's team take the summer off, or is the public’s right to know more important in expediting the query without interruptions?

Try to be objective and bear in mind IF during the Watergate or Whitewater investigations a break occurred.
Mueller can’t prove collusion
The Russians told him let’s get it on
Good luck with your boy
Russia interfering with our election does not require collusion to be breaking our laws....
Produce the evidence
The Russians “want” their day in court.
They will......the Grand Jury has seen the evidence and they decided indictments should b issued by Mueller.

In discovery, the defendant will see the evidence.
 
No keep it going. The only thing it's revealing, is the democrat corruption.

Want to see a list of ALL those "democrats" who have been charged or indicted with corruption???.......Take a look

Criminal charges

As of February 22, 2018, the Special Counsel has publicly initiated criminal proceedings against 19 people—five U.S. nationals, 13 Russian nationals, and one Dutch national—and three Russian organizations. The Special Counsel has used two different federal grand juries to issue indictments: one located in the District of Columbia (D.D.C.) and another located in the Eastern District of Virginia (E.D. Va.).

Accused

Date charged

Charge(s)

Case status

Jurisdiction

Ind.

George Papadopoulos

October 3, 2017

1 count: false statements

Pleaded guilty on October 5, 2017[294]

D.D.C.

[295]

Rick Gates

October 27, 2017[A]

2 counts: conspiracy against the United States and false statements

Pleaded guilty on February 23, 2018[4]

D.D.C.

[297]

February 22, 2018

18 counts: filing false tax returns (×5), failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts (×4), bank fraud conspiracy (×5), and bank fraud (×4)

Charges dismissed without prejudice on February 27, 2018[298]

E.D. Va.

[299]

Paul Manafort

October 27, 2017https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017–present)#cite_note-301

5 counts: conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading FARA statements, and false statements.

Pleaded not guilty on February 28, 2018[300]

D.D.C.

[301]

February 22, 2018

23 counts: assisting in the preparation of false tax returns (×5), subscribing to false tax returns (×5), filing a false amended return, failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts (×3), bank fraud conspiracy (×5), and bank fraud (×4)

Pleaded not guilty on March 8, 2018[302]

E.D. Va.

[299]

Michael Flynn

November 30, 2017

1 count: false statements

Pleaded guilty on December 1, 2017[303]

D.D.C.

[304]

Richard Pinedo

February 2, 2018

1 count: identity fraud

Pleaded guilty on February 2, 2018[305]

D.D.C.

[306]

Alex van der Zwaan

February 16, 2018

1 count: false statements

Sentenced to 30 days in prison and a $20,000 fine on April 3, 2018[307]

D.D.C.

[308]

Dzheykhun Aslanov

February 16, 2018

8 counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraudand bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft (×6)

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Anna Bogacheva

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Maria Bovda

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Robert Bovda

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Mikhail Burchik

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Mikhail Bystrov

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Concord Catering

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Concord Management and Consulting LLC

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Pleaded not guilty on May 10, 2018.[310]

D.D.C.

[309]

Internet Research Agency LLC

February 16, 2018

8 counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraudand bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft (×6)

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Irina Kaverzina

February 16, 2018

7 counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, and aggravated identity theft (×6)

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Aleksandra Krylova

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Vadim Podkopaev

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Sergey Polozov

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Yevgeny Prigozhin

February 16, 2018

1 count: conspiracy to defraud the United States

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Gleb Vasilchenko

February 16, 2018

8 counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, aggravated identity theft(×6)

Outside US jurisdiction

D.D.C.

[309]

Vladimir Venkov

February 16, 2018

7 counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, and aggravated identity theft (×6)

Outside US jurisdiction
 

Forum List

Back
Top