So you don't understand the greenhouse effect? What's so difficult about it?A quick reading of the first and last pages leaves me not understanding the OP's original question's initial reply: what's his point? I mean besides the gobbledygook word soup he employs for obfuscation.
At first it seemed he didn't understand the difference between long and short wave radiation and now he's insisting someone believes heat is moving from a cold body to a warmer one.
Can someone describe his point?
The main point is that SSDD thinks objects stop radiating if they are near another object that is as warm or warmer.
The other side thinks all objects radiate fully at all times.
In the usual manner, you completely miss the point...the point was that there is no greenhouse effect as described by climate science...but thank's as always for playing...see the front desk for your parting gift.
The GHE is more difficult to explain than you would think when arguing with someone like SSDD who demands undeniable proof for every step in the logic chain.