Rachel Maddow’s Brain Numbing Attack on David Horowitz

Freewill

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2011
31,158
5,073
1,130
Here is a expose on how the democrat party has not helped the black family it hurts the black family. Remember one of the very first things Obama did as President? He ended the school voucher program for Washington inner city blacks. Can anyone, anyone, tell me that welfare has helped the majority IN THE LONG RUN? Yes, people need help when things happen beyond their control. Yes, we should help them get back on their feet. But what we are doing today is not helping but hurting the majority. Clearly when Biden said "they'll but you all in chains" he was clearly stating his white position of superiority.

Any way, from the article:

Rachel Maddow?s Brain Numbing Attack on David Horowitz | FrontPage Magazine

And that’s all he said. The issues are there – accountability, standards and rewards for teacher performance. The policy is there. But the moral outrage is missing. The victims are missing and the culprits aren’t named. It’s not the “educational establishment” that’s ruining the lives and blocking the opportunities of African American and Hispanic children. It’s the Democrats – they are the educational establishment in every failing public school district. The Democrat teacher unions and the Democrat Party that supports them are destroying the lives of African American and Hispanic students whose parents are too poor to put them in private schools – the same private schools where Democrat legislators and union leaders send their own children.

Democrats will fight to the death to prevent poor parents from getting vouchers to provide their children with the same education that well-heeled Democratic legislators provide for theirs. This is a moral atrocity. This is an issue to get angry about and mobilize constituencies over. This is an issue that could drive a Gibraltar size wedge through the Democratic base. But Republicans are too polite to do that.

This is merely the most obvious atrocity that Democrats are committing against America’s impoverished minorities. Subverting family structures through a misconceived welfare system, encouraging food stamp dependency, providing incentives to bring into this world massive numbers of children who have no prospect of a decent life just to earn a welfare dollar. These are the corrupt fruits of Democratic welfare policies which are spiraling out of control. Republicans criticize these programs as “wasteful.” They need to start attacking them as destructive, as attacks on the human beings who are ensnared by them.

The way for Republicans to show they care about minorities is to defend them against their oppressors and exploiters, which in every major inner city in America without exception are Democrats. Democrats run the welfare and public education systems; they have created the policies, ruin the lives of the recipients of their handouts. It’s time that Republicans started to hold Democrats to account; to put them on the defensive and take away the moral high ground, which they now occupy illegitimately. Government welfare is not just wasteful; it is destructive. The public school system in America’s inner cities is not merely ineffective; it is racist and criminal.
 
Here is a expose on how the democrat party has not helped the black family it hurts the black family. Remember one of the very first things Obama did as President? He ended the school voucher program for Washington inner city blacks. Can anyone, anyone, tell me that welfare has helped the majority IN THE LONG RUN? Yes, people need help when things happen beyond their control. Yes, we should help them get back on their feet. But what we are doing today is not helping but hurting the majority. Clearly when Biden said "they'll but you all in chains" he was clearly stating his white position of superiority.

Any way, from the article:

Rachel Maddow?s Brain Numbing Attack on David Horowitz | FrontPage Magazine

And that’s all he said. The issues are there – accountability, standards and rewards for teacher performance. The policy is there. But the moral outrage is missing. The victims are missing and the culprits aren’t named. It’s not the “educational establishment” that’s ruining the lives and blocking the opportunities of African American and Hispanic children. It’s the Democrats – they are the educational establishment in every failing public school district. The Democrat teacher unions and the Democrat Party that supports them are destroying the lives of African American and Hispanic students whose parents are too poor to put them in private schools – the same private schools where Democrat legislators and union leaders send their own children.

Democrats will fight to the death to prevent poor parents from getting vouchers to provide their children with the same education that well-heeled Democratic legislators provide for theirs. This is a moral atrocity. This is an issue to get angry about and mobilize constituencies over. This is an issue that could drive a Gibraltar size wedge through the Democratic base. But Republicans are too polite to do that.

This is merely the most obvious atrocity that Democrats are committing against America’s impoverished minorities. Subverting family structures through a misconceived welfare system, encouraging food stamp dependency, providing incentives to bring into this world massive numbers of children who have no prospect of a decent life just to earn a welfare dollar. These are the corrupt fruits of Democratic welfare policies which are spiraling out of control. Republicans criticize these programs as “wasteful.” They need to start attacking them as destructive, as attacks on the human beings who are ensnared by them.

The way for Republicans to show they care about minorities is to defend them against their oppressors and exploiters, which in every major inner city in America without exception are Democrats. Democrats run the welfare and public education systems; they have created the policies, ruin the lives of the recipients of their handouts. It’s time that Republicans started to hold Democrats to account; to put them on the defensive and take away the moral high ground, which they now occupy illegitimately. Government welfare is not just wasteful; it is destructive. The public school system in America’s inner cities is not merely ineffective; it is racist and criminal.

So Democrats fight against Pell grants and Republicans are all for them?
 
The best thing about being rachel maddow is that no one pays any attention to her anyway.
 
See I started this thread without comment. I was hoping some left winger could explain who in the hell is Maddow.

April 15, 2013

Hell she can't even come close to Hannity and Piers Morgan does almost twice as well, that is really bad.

Cable News Ratings for Monday, March 25, 2013 - Ratings | TVbytheNumbers

Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity 4,000 1,303 1,970
CNN PIERS MORGAN LIVE 2,653 1,312 1,559
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show 1,501 557 875
CNBC TREASURE DETECTIVES 167 93 122
HLN Dr. Drew ON CALL 642 241 370
 
Last edited:
So, once again the content is not addressed, except by one liberal and nothing but character attacks. So lets say Horowitz is everything that the left has flung at him, doesn't change what he said.

If the Republicans want to win again they need to tell the TRUE story of the party of the KKK and the party of Lincoln.

The program that Obama killed wasn't Pell Grants it was D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program. If you would like to read what he did you can read it here. But first, pretend that you are reading about what GWB did and not Obama.

PostPartisan - Why is Obama killing off D.C.'s voucher program?
 
What?

From two people watch to three?

She is a moron.

I have always wondered if she is a Transgendered Fred Savage.

$rachel-maddow-4-sized.jpg $savage.jpg


The best thing about being rachel maddow is that no one pays any attention to her anyway.
Her ratings are way up!
 
Maddow's attack is an example of lefties dragging out the race card when they are desperately afraid about a backlash about the old revolutionary left including Ayers, Dohrn and Boudin who used to make bombs just like the ones the Boston bombers used. Horowitz is famous for exposing the history of the radicals who have taken over higher education and the last thing the modern left wants to do is defend these monsters.
 
.

The Left is pretty touchy about Horowitz for two reasons: He was a hardcore lefty when he was a kid and likes to tell stories from those days, and he's very aggressive on exposing what's happening at our colleges. Very unpopular guy with the lefties.

From Front Page's site: The bottom line is this: If Republicans want to persuade minorities they care about them, they have to stand up for them; they have to defend them; and they have to show them that Democrats are playing them for suckers, exploiting them, oppressing them, and profiting from their suffering.

Agreed. But the Republicans won't be able to do this unless and until they marginalize the loons more effectively. But yeah, this is the approach I'd love to see them take.

.
 
.

The Left is pretty touchy about Horowitz for two reasons: He was a hardcore lefty when he was a kid and likes to tell stories from those days, and he's very aggressive on exposing what's happening at our colleges. Very unpopular guy with the lefties.

From Front Page's site: The bottom line is this: If Republicans want to persuade minorities they care about them, they have to stand up for them; they have to defend them; and they have to show them that Democrats are playing them for suckers, exploiting them, oppressing them, and profiting from their suffering.

Agreed. But the Republicans won't be able to do this unless and until they marginalize the loons more effectively. But yeah, this is the approach I'd love to see them take.

.

I think the loon thing is blown way out of proportion. It is part and parcel of the what I call the liberal storyline. It is what they do. In one hand they will say that welfare is sucked up by mostly those in blue states. Insinuating that it is Republicans thus white people. Then if welfare reform is even suggested the word racism is spewed. So they play it both ways and apparently a whole lot of people don't notice. The Welfare state we are becoming does not just effect blacks, it effects people of all color. But the liberal left will play the race card every time expressing their white superiority, which of course is the definition of racism. "they will put you all back in chains!!!!" How in the hell do we elect such racists? If a Republican would have made such and asinine statement the NAACP would still be howling and rightfully so. I guess having a black friend in the WH makes up for a lot of latent racism.

There is nothing the Republican party can do about loons, they are what they are. The best they can do is distance themselves. Tell the truth about the party of Lincoln vs the party of slavery. The truth will make us free not the story lines that are ginned up by the MSM. But it won't be easy. Considering any such endeavor will be met by stiff opposition by the liberal MSM. But it is what must be done for the future of the country. That plus sound fiscal policy one that brings jobs back to America and stops the flood of low skill labor taking the jobs Americans can do. We should be doing EVERYTHING we can to promote corporation building in American not China or India.

Personally I think more of blacks then apparently do the liberals. I believe that giving them a fair shot on an even playing field they will be and can be successful as has been shown.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xryXpK042pQ]Examining Black Loyalty to Democrats - YouTube[/ame]
 
.

The Left is pretty touchy about Horowitz for two reasons: He was a hardcore lefty when he was a kid and likes to tell stories from those days, and he's very aggressive on exposing what's happening at our colleges. Very unpopular guy with the lefties.

From Front Page's site: The bottom line is this: If Republicans want to persuade minorities they care about them, they have to stand up for them; they have to defend them; and they have to show them that Democrats are playing them for suckers, exploiting them, oppressing them, and profiting from their suffering.

Agreed. But the Republicans won't be able to do this unless and until they marginalize the loons more effectively. But yeah, this is the approach I'd love to see them take.

.

I think the loon thing is blown way out of proportion. It is part and parcel of the what I call the liberal storyline. It is what they do. In one hand they will say that welfare is sucked up by mostly those in blue states. Insinuating that it is Republicans thus white people. Then if welfare reform is even suggested the word racism is spewed. So they play it both ways and apparently a whole lot of people don't notice. The Welfare state we are becoming does not just effect blacks, it effects people of all color. But the liberal left will play the race card every time expressing their white superiority, which of course is the definition of racism. "they will put you all back in chains!!!!" How in the hell do we elect such racists? If a Republican would have made such and asinine statement the NAACP would still be howling and rightfully so. I guess having a black friend in the WH makes up for a lot of latent racism.

There is nothing the Republican party can do about loons, they are what they are. The best they can do is distance themselves. Tell the truth about the party of Lincoln vs the party of slavery. The truth will make us free not the story lines that are ginned up by the MSM. But it won't be easy. Considering any such endeavor will be met by stiff opposition by the liberal MSM. But it is what must be done for the future of the country. That plus sound fiscal policy one that brings jobs back to America and stops the flood of low skill labor taking the jobs Americans can do. We should be doing EVERYTHING we can to promote corporation building in American not China or India.

Personally I think more of blacks then apparently do the liberals. I believe that giving them a fair shot on an even playing field they will be and can be successful as has been shown.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xryXpK042pQ]Examining Black Loyalty to Democrats - YouTube[/ame]


There are two problems with the GOP's loons: First, they're just loud. They're stuck in absolutist mode and really want to be heard. Second, the media will always, always jump all over every ill-advised, lame and absolutist thing these people say because it fits the media's goals. So the least the GOP should do is sit down with these people and school them on the damage they do.

The GOP is operating from a deep, deep hole when it comes to this issue, and the only way they'll be able to improve their situation is to get on the same page regarding Horowitz's strategy. They can't be afraid to have the PC Police call them racists, they have to be absolutely prepared to fight back when it happens. The Left has been speaking with a strong voice on this issue for decades, it's been extremely effective, and combating it effectively won't happen overnight.

But it had better start pretty freakin' soon.

.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7iSEUEKI_M&list=PL8C94E735BE457E7A&feature=player_embedded#]PJTV: Rand Paul Needs to Clear the Air About Private Sector Discrimination - YouTube[/ame]!
 
Both political parties count on suckers to stay in business. The secret to their success is each party has teeny-tiny kernals of truth in its shit, and those kernals somehow induce zombie-like states that numb partisans to the stink. An important difference in party dogma is nutball dogma is all about the bottom two tiers of Maslow's Needs Hierarchy, while fake-liberal dogma comes out of the top two tiers and trickles down. The battle is fought in the center tier.

Fake-liberal fascist kernals of truth assume man's law and derive from social injustice. One is hard pressed to find a DP program after the mid-1970s not based in some real or imagined social injustice. Best example: welfare destroyed families because it was structured to redress women's dependence on men. Who is surprised that men bailed as quick as government picked up the tab? From affirmative action to disregard for other people's money, fake-liberals have plenty to answer for.

Nutball kernals of truth assume natural law and derive from primordial instincts. "So what?" is perhaps the best description of the nutball code. Then comes God - hard to find an atheist among committed nutballs. The resulting dogma is no less shaped by humans than liberal dogma, but the fantasy is a higher power approves nutball dogma. When amoral nouveaux took over in 1981 the social responsibility mask of self-righteousness was torn off; power and wealth became worthy in their own right, and the last vestige of social responsibility, religion, became the merest of foils for naked greed.

Both today's partisan fantasists would be hilarious in EITHER of their own perfect worlds. Alas, we do not live in any form of perfect world.

Bloodless entities, corporations, bought control of both parties by 1980. Education unions, lawyers unions, insurance corporations and finance corporations control the Democratic Party, while finance corporations, medical corporations, second wave energy corporations and to a lesser extent heavy industry, controls the Republican Party. Finance is the common bond and the reason for both "too big to fail" and bailouts every few years since the first round 1987-1990.

To tie this in to Rachel Maddow and David Horowitz, who cares? Each is a mouthpiece for a gaggle of degenerates claiming moral high ground no living member ever stood on. Fuck them.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top