ratings for Jan 6th hearings crushed by reruns of Young Sheldon ..

[CowboyTed]

a rerun of young Sheldon got better ratings a week ago in the same time slot !

Resistance Porn Ratings Fail: Jan. 6 Committee Hearing Crushed by 'Young Sheldon' Rerun

CBS opted to bump a Young Sheldon rerun from its 8 p.m. primetime slot in favor of the Jan 6. committee hearing on Thursday evening. The decision backfired.

freebeacon.com

Highest rated show on TV last year was NFL Sunday Night Football, with nearly nearly 17 million viewers, followed by NFL Thursday Night Football, with around 13.4 million viewers.

The first hearing got 19 - 20 million, alright for CSpan....

 

[marvin martian]

a rerun of young Sheldon got better ratings a week ago in the same time slot !

Resistance Porn Ratings Fail: Jan. 6 Committee Hearing Crushed by 'Young Sheldon' Rerun

CBS opted to bump a Young Sheldon rerun from its 8 p.m. primetime slot in favor of the Jan 6. committee hearing on Thursday evening. The decision backfired.

freebeacon.com

The DemoKKKrats are so, so, so close to making their shows mandatory and illegal to look away from, just like the screens in 1984.

 

[Meister]

Ummm?
Defend what?
Who asked you to defend anything?
Could that be a strawman you've hastily erected?

I say that in jest, but note.......nobody is asking you to defend your assertion the Select Committee's hearings are a 'kangaroo court'.

Rather, what you were queried about was:
What was your opinion of the testimonies of Wm. Barr, Benjamin Ginsburg, and Bill Stempien ....AFTER you had watched and listened to their under-oath testimonies?

And then, as far as your charge that it is "a one sided hearing".....well, take note that yesteray's hearing had plenty....plenty ....of Republicans. In fact, most of the witnesses.....many from Trump's own campaign professionals and the White House.... were Republican....from Ginsburg to Barr to Stempien to any number of White House and campaign lawyers. There were likely far more Republicans at yesterday's hearing than Democrats, or Green Party or whoever.

But back to the topic: What was your opinion of various testimonies after you had watched and listened to 'em?

Oh, You're asking if I wasted my time watching a one sided Kangaroo hearing? Um no, I won't watch something with just half
the news. Now if Pelosi was forced to answer questions from someone other than a democrat or RINO, I may have watched.
In all honesty, I probably was watching the weather channel.

 

[CowboyTed]

Oh please, if anything less and less people will be watching as it's more exciting to watch grass grow. Anybody with a half a brain knows what this is all about. That's why they hired an ABC exec to try and find a way to make it interesting.

Watching people act who are not actors is like guys telling jokes that are not comedians. People just turn them off.

This is not meant to be entertainment, you want people to stay ignorant. Combined the ratings makes it one of the most watched shows of the year... Unlike other events there is no exclusive tv rights deal...

This is going to end with an audience of 12 people who will really matter... It is becoming very clear that Trump broke the law...

 

[CowboyTed]

Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?

They were offered and they refused....

Then when they eventually wanted to join they proposed a material witness... It was rightly refused..

The committee is there to find the truth. They have no powers of prosecution so if the AG decides to press charges then they will have plenty of time to refute the evidence...

 

[Chillicothe]

Oh, You're asking if I wasted my time watching a one sided Kangaroo hearing?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, that is not what was asked of you.
However, you did answer a question that was NOT asked.

You simply did not watch that which you wish to offer the forum an informed opinion on.

Clue: Informed opinions don't work that way. An opinion that is not grounded in the minimal amount of time or due diligence to investigate, experience, or examine.....ain't an opinion. It is a keyboard enema.
I think you know that.

We are disappointed, poster Meister.
If one has an opinion one should strive to make it a quality, informed, knowledgeable opinion.
Otherwise, it ain't really an opinion. It is screechy venting by someone who is unhappy with his lot in life. It is only some kind of undisciplined 'release'.

That doesn't necessarily apply to you personally. It could though, probably.....apply to your avatar.

If you wish to express an opinion then make it one that represents your intelligence, diligence, and sense of responsibility.

Otherwise just drink. Or get a cat. Or go wash your car.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They were offered and they refused....

Then when they eventually wanted to join they proposed a material witness... It was rightly refused..

The committee is there to find the truth. They have no powers of prosecution so if the AG decides to press charges then they will have plenty of time to refute the evidence...

"They were offered and they refused...."


Really, you have to put a little more effort into your lies.

Pelosi rejects GOP picks Jordan, Banks on Jan. 6 committee​

https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2021/07/21
Jul 21, 2021 — WASHINGTON - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday rejected two Republican members for the select committee that will investigate the Jan


In a statement, Pelosi said Democrats in her caucus had raised specific objections to Jordan and Banks “and the impact their appointments may have on the integrity of the investigation.”

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,” she said.

She did not specify what statements and actions she was referring to."

Pelosi rejects Jordan, Banks for Jan. 6 committee

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday rejected two of the Republican picks — Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio) and Jim Banks (Ind.) — for the Jan. 6 select committee. Both GOP lawmakers are staunch al…

thehill.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

They were offered and they refused....

Then when they eventually wanted to join they proposed a material witness... It was rightly refused..

The committee is there to find the truth. They have no powers of prosecution so if the AG decides to press charges then they will have plenty of time to refute the evidence...

I suppose it is a lack of creativity, not just honesty, that your sort simply copies their forebears.


First, they took a page from earlier socialists, the National Socialist German Worker's Party, who burned down their capitol and said the other side did it....

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to ...​

https://www.smithsonianmag.com › history › true-story...
— Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's fire, conspiracy theories are sure to follow. At least, that's what happened in Germany on ...


The exact story of Jan6....





And their other cousins.....who tried political enemies on fake charges.

Great Purge​

Soviet history
Print Cite Share Feedback

Alternate titles: purge trials
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

---

Joseph Stalin
See all media
Date: August 1936 - March 13, 1938Location: Moscow RussiaKey People: Lev Kamenev Karl Radek Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov Leon Trotsky Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda...(Show more)
See all related content →
Summary

Read a brief summary of this topic​

Great Purge, also called purge trials, three widely publicized show trials and a series of closed, unpublicized trials held in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s, in which many prominent Old Bolsheviks were found guilty of treason and executed or imprisoned. All the evidence presented in court was derived from preliminary examinations of the defendants and from their confessions. It was subsequently established that the accused were innocent, that the cases were fabricated by the secret police (NKVD), and that the confessions were made under pressure of intensive torture and intimidation.
The trials successfully eliminated the major real and potential political rivals and critics of Joseph Stalin. The trials were the public aspect of the widespread purge that sent millions of alleged “enemies of the people” to prison camps in the 1930s.

READ MORE ....






Luckily they both had ooodles of brain dead adherents.....you know.....like you.





Have you ever read any history???????


Have you ever read a book???



Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.

He was thinking of you.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Democrats just can't seem to grasp that with inflation at 8% and climbing and with gas prices at historic highs, most people don't give a hoot about the January 6 committee. Nobody where I work has been watching it.

 

[Flash]

This is not meant to be entertainment, you want people to stay ignorant. Combined the ratings makes it one of the most watched shows of the year... Unlike other events there is no exclusive tv rights deal...

This is going to end with an audience of 12 people who will really matter... It is becoming very clear that Trump broke the law...

The audience were stupid Moon Bats, afflicted with the mental illness of TDS and a few political commentators who watched it so they could comment on it.

 

[Meister]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, that is not what was asked of you.
However, you did answer a question that was NOT asked.

You simply did not watch that which you wish to offer the forum an informed opinion on.

Clue: Informed opinions don't work that way. An opinion that is not grounded in the minimal amount of time or due diligence to investigate, experience, or examine.....ain't an opinion. It is a keyboard enema.
I think you know that.

We are disappointed, poster Meister.
If one has an opinion one should strive to make it a quality, informed, knowledgeable opinion.
Otherwise, it ain't really an opinion. It is screechy venting by someone who is unhappy with his lot in life. It is only some kind of undisciplined 'release'.

That doesn't necessarily apply to you personally. It could though, probably.....apply to your avatar.

If you wish to express an opinion then make it one that represents your intelligence, diligence, and sense of responsibility.

Otherwise just drink. Or get a cat. Or go wash your car.

Dude, you're delusional. Talk your crap all you want, I will not waste my time watching something that is a one sided event.
I would say that even if I was a liberal. Nobody was there to refute jack shit. Your OPINION is based on just one side that
wasn't even scrutinized. You heard what your own narrative is. China does that kind of crap.

I bet you're an Adam Schiff fan.

 

[CowboyTed]

"They were offered and they refused...."


Really, you have to put a little more effort into your lies.

Pelosi rejects GOP picks Jordan, Banks on Jan. 6 committee​

https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2021/07/21
Jul 21, 2021 — WASHINGTON - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday rejected two Republican members for the select committee that will investigate the Jan


In a statement, Pelosi said Democrats in her caucus had raised specific objections to Jordan and Banks “and the impact their appointments may have on the integrity of the investigation.”

“With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,” she said.

She did not specify what statements and actions she was referring to."

Pelosi rejects Jordan, Banks for Jan. 6 committee

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday rejected two of the Republican picks — Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio) and Jim Banks (Ind.) — for the Jan. 6 select committee. Both GOP lawmakers are staunch al…

thehill.com

Both are material witnesses in the investigation:
Jim Jordan is obvious...

Jim Banks was actively undermining the committee trying to get information. and committed fraud...

Liz Cheney calls out Jim Banks for falsely signing letter as the ranking member of January 6 committee

GOP Rep. Jim Banks lamented on the House floor that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi prevented him from serving on the House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol on Thursday.

edition.cnn.com

GOP Rep. Tried to Con Cabinet Officials Into Thinking He Was on Jan. 6 Committee

Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) sent letters to Cabinet agencies as "Ranking Member" of the Jan. 6 committee, even though he's not on it.

www.rollingstone.com

Anyway McCarthy was given the opportunity at the start and he rejected thinking that he could block everyone from serving... The committee got two republicans who love their country over their party and wanted the truth... This is what happens when you don't want to participate... Trying to blame others for a massive misstep is pointless at this time...

 

[Meister]

Both are material witnesses in the investigation:
Jim Jordan is obvious...

Jim Banks was actively undermining the committee trying to get information. and committed fraud...

Liz Cheney calls out Jim Banks for falsely signing letter as the ranking member of January 6 committee

GOP Rep. Jim Banks lamented on the House floor that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi prevented him from serving on the House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol on Thursday.

edition.cnn.com

GOP Rep. Tried to Con Cabinet Officials Into Thinking He Was on Jan. 6 Committee

Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) sent letters to Cabinet agencies as "Ranking Member" of the Jan. 6 committee, even though he's not on it.

www.rollingstone.com

Anyway McCarthy was given the opportunity at the start and he rejected thinking that he could block everyone from serving... The committee got two republicans who love their country over their party and wanted the truth... This is what happens when you don't want to participate... Trying to blame others for a massive misstep is pointless at this time...

Pelosi should have been a material witness. Funny how that turned out

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The committee is there to find the truth.

And I'm here to solve world hunger.

The reason Banks and Jordan were refused is because they would have found the truth, but the truth involves the nefarious actions by Piglosi and others on her side.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This is not meant to be entertainment, you want people to stay ignorant. Combined the ratings makes it one of the most watched shows of the year... Unlike other events there is no exclusive tv rights deal...

This is going to end with an audience of 12 people who will really matter... It is becoming very clear that Trump broke the law...

It is? Name that law he broke.

Of course it's meant to be entertainment. You don't hire a CEO from the entertainment industry to handle it if it was not entertainment. Ratings is not what they are after. They wanted it broadcasted by all their fellow Communist stations to try and brainwash the public. If they had the ability, there would be television billboards all across the nation with this thing on.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Highest rated show on TV last year was NFL Sunday Night Football, with nearly nearly 17 million viewers, followed by NFL Thursday Night Football, with around 13.4 million viewers.

The first hearing got 19 - 20 million, alright for CSpan....

And they lost more than half of that audience by the second hearing.

 

[Godboy]

It is? Name that law he broke.

Thats the part they always struggle with. The smart ones just dont respond to that question and pretend like it never happened. The dumb ones will say some dumb shit like "inciting a riot" and then never really explain how he incited the riot. I mean, i guess im preaching to the choir here. Weve all seen this silly nonsense a thousand times.

The ONLY reason this "January 6th Hearing" is happening in Congress is because they know that they cant even get their foot into a courthouse with their "evidence", but their dumbass voters are buying into their horseshit hook line and sinker. Its amusing to watch their hopes and dreams dashed though. They cant touch Teflon Don.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Thats the part they always struggle with. The smart ones just dont respond to that question and pretend like it never happened. The dumb ones will say some dumb shit like "inciting a riot" and then never really explain how he incited the riot. I mean, i guess im preaching to the choir here. Weve all seen this silly nonsense a thousand times.

The ONLY reason this "January 6th Hearing" is happening in Congress is because they know that they cant even get their foot into a courthouse with their "evidence", but their dumbass voters are buying into their horseshit hook line and sinker.

Not at all. They know they don't have anything but trying to tarnish Trump which has been their goal from the beginning. They could care less about any conviction and it keeps their puppets foaming at the mouth at the same time.

If they try to do anything to President Trump in that regards, Shoemaker won't be able to sleep a wink unless they keep the House next year which is 99% against them at this point. He's the guy who incited the assassination attack on Justice Kavanaugh, and there is way more evidence against him than they can dream up against President Trump.

 

[Meister]

And they lost more than half of that audience by the second hearing.

I heard they cancelled the third....due to technical difficulties?

 

[lantern2814]

This is not meant to be entertainment, you want people to stay ignorant. Combined the ratings makes it one of the most watched shows of the year... Unlike other events there is no exclusive tv rights deal...

This is going to end with an audience of 12 people who will really matter... It is becoming very clear that Trump broke the law...

Speaking of ignorant ^^^^^. Another dope who thinks you can combine numbers from multiple networks and use them. No wonder you swallow the debunked shit these clowns are offering