Rayshard Brooks was "Calm, Cordial, and Really Displayed a Cooperative Nature..."



He also said Brooks "never presented himself as a threat".


Is the District Attorney trying to get the office acquitted? Why is he blatantly lying? Who does he think he is kidding? If you want to tell me that the officer was out of danger after the taser was fired and he didn't have to shoot him at that point....fine. I think it's a justified shooting, but if you want to argue that he didn't HAVE to shoot him...I'll listen.

But why are you being a lying piece of shit? Anybody, besides the most ardent of white hate black racist, will see past this nonsense. Calm, Cordial, and Cooperative? When he violently resisted arrest and escalated every single step of the incident? Never presented himself as a threat? When he wrestled and punched the officers and stole their weapon? How can anyone actually believe this?

I ask again...who are the real racists here?

Funny how firing a weapon is now not presenting a threat


they patted him down & the cop knew that taser was not life threatening to him especially after it was rendered useless. that's when he shot brooks in the back.


A taser will render you helpless.


yep. howverrrrrrrrrrrrr............ after discharging twice - it cannot be used again. hence the useless part. when he was running away, turned & discharged the taser - that was the 2nd time - hence again the useless part.

he was shot, in the back, twice, after the cop knew the taser was not going to do a damn thing.


Wrong.
He did have a shot left in the taser.
You can see him fire it here....


the 2nd time the taser was shot was the time that brooks shot it & it was rendered unfunctional at that point. . the DA not only concluded that - but got confirmation from the manufacturer of that taser.


I already told you where you can see him fire the taser.
But keep your head up your ass.
 
Atlanta Fire Department releases new photos of 2nd suspect in Wendy's arson
Published 1 day ago
Atlanta
FOX 5 Atlanta


WendysArson1.jpg


ATLANTA - Atlanta officials have released photos of another suspect who is believed to have set fire to a southwest Atlanta Wendy's that was the site of the deadly shooting of 27-year-old Rayshard Brooks.

On Tuesday afternoon, officials shared new images of one of the two suspects at a press conference at a fire station on Manford Road. Both suspects believed to be connected to the crime are white women.

Earlier photos of a suspect showed an individual wearing black clothing and a face covering.
The new surveillance photos show another suspect, a woman without a mask who is wearing a black with a purple shirt on her waist and a necklace. She is carrying a blue bag and a water bottle.
[...]

Arson1-1.jpg

Atlanta Fire Department releases new photos of 2nd suspect in Wendy's arson

:eusa_whistle:


Not shocking
There are a lot of wigger enablers out there.
Usually the womens are a bit fatter than that though.
 


He also said Brooks "never presented himself as a threat".


Is the District Attorney trying to get the office acquitted? Why is he blatantly lying? Who does he think he is kidding? If you want to tell me that the officer was out of danger after the taser was fired and he didn't have to shoot him at that point....fine. I think it's a justified shooting, but if you want to argue that he didn't HAVE to shoot him...I'll listen.

But why are you being a lying piece of shit? Anybody, besides the most ardent of white hate black racist, will see past this nonsense. Calm, Cordial, and Cooperative? When he violently resisted arrest and escalated every single step of the incident? Never presented himself as a threat? When he wrestled and punched the officers and stole their weapon? How can anyone actually believe this?

I ask again...who are the real racists here?

Funny how firing a weapon is now not presenting a threat


they patted him down & the cop knew that taser was not life threatening to him especially after it was rendered useless. that's when he shot brooks in the back.


A taser will render you helpless.


yep. howverrrrrrrrrrrrr............ after discharging twice - it cannot be used again. hence the useless part. when he was running away, turned & discharged the taser - that was the 2nd time - hence again the useless part.

he was shot, in the back, twice, after the cop knew the taser was not going to do a damn thing.

But but but the same DA that charged the police, claimed about two weeks ago that "taser is use of deadly force according to Georgia law" when referring to police using it against violent rioters.


but but but the ' fired ' taser was the same as a gun without bullets & the cop knew it when brooks was shot in the back. THAT is the point.

they patted him down earlier - without resistance - & found he had no other weapons. soooooooooooo.....

These two police officers will be completely exonerated. Only an idiot would steal a cop's taser, tase a second one and give him a concussion as a result, and then shoot the taser at the officer's head while running, and expect to live through that. Perhaps you should try it? Is there a Wendy's or McDonalds left standing close to where you live? :cuckoo:
 


Did you even watch that video?
The guy didnt even know where he was and he was all over the place. First he didnt know what he was drinking,then it was a pina colada and half a margarita.
The guy couldnt keep his story straight and he kept trying to deflect the conversation to his gf and daughter.

When they tried to put him in cuffs he started fighting.

Thats it,end of story.


he was drunk. there's no disputing that. he was compliant in all the field tests they made him do - when all they had to do was give him the breathaliser from the start. that would have been the end of it.

they played with him & never said he was under arrest until all of that happened.


So they gave him a chance to prove he wasnt intoxicated and you bitch about it.
And what makes you think it would have turned out any different if they'd gave him the breathalyzer first?
Besides thats not how they do it. They always give field sobriety tests.


uh-huh. the first cop smelled alcohol & that alone is reason to do a breathalyzer. the field tests are used if said breathalyzer isn't functioning or not available. why? why you say? because 'opinion' - even a professional one does not match what the breathalyzer does; which records the legal, or not legal limit of the one taking it; & shows the results beyond a reasonable doubt aka game over. field tests will be used in conjunction if the driver shows they are slightly under the limit & they wanna judge how impaired he is.

brooks willingly took it. & they didn't utter a word that he was under arrest per their own protocol which is a

fail fail fail on the cops part.

bigley.


Bullshit.
They always give field sobriety tests which of course are recorded to bolster the prosecution's case.
They told him to put his hands behind his back,he resisted.
End of story.


bullshit. & at no point did they say he was under arrest. that was completely against their own policy.

end of story.
 
Atlanta Fire Department releases new photos of 2nd suspect in Wendy's arson
Published 1 day ago
Atlanta
FOX 5 Atlanta


WendysArson1.jpg


ATLANTA - Atlanta officials have released photos of another suspect who is believed to have set fire to a southwest Atlanta Wendy's that was the site of the deadly shooting of 27-year-old Rayshard Brooks.

On Tuesday afternoon, officials shared new images of one of the two suspects at a press conference at a fire station on Manford Road. Both suspects believed to be connected to the crime are white women.

Earlier photos of a suspect showed an individual wearing black clothing and a face covering.
The new surveillance photos show another suspect, a woman without a mask who is wearing a black with a purple shirt on her waist and a necklace. She is carrying a blue bag and a water bottle.
[...]

Arson1-1.jpg

Atlanta Fire Department releases new photos of 2nd suspect in Wendy's arson

:eusa_whistle:


Not shocking
There are a lot of wigger enablers out there.
Usually the womens are a bit fatter than that though.

will you be calling them part of antifa too? :auiqs.jpg:
 


Did you even watch that video?
The guy didnt even know where he was and he was all over the place. First he didnt know what he was drinking,then it was a pina colada and half a margarita.
The guy couldnt keep his story straight and he kept trying to deflect the conversation to his gf and daughter.

When they tried to put him in cuffs he started fighting.

Thats it,end of story.


he was drunk. there's no disputing that. he was compliant in all the field tests they made him do - when all they had to do was give him the breathaliser from the start. that would have been the end of it.

they played with him & never said he was under arrest until all of that happened.


So they gave him a chance to prove he wasnt intoxicated and you bitch about it.
And what makes you think it would have turned out any different if they'd gave him the breathalyzer first?
Besides thats not how they do it. They always give field sobriety tests.


uh-huh. the first cop smelled alcohol & that alone is reason to do a breathalyzer. the field tests are used if said breathalyzer isn't functioning or not available. why? why you say? because 'opinion' - even a professional one does not match what the breathalyzer does; which records the legal, or not legal limit of the one taking it; & shows the results beyond a reasonable doubt aka game over. field tests will be used in conjunction if the driver shows they are slightly under the limit & they wanna judge how impaired he is.

brooks willingly took it. & they didn't utter a word that he was under arrest per their own protocol which is a

fail fail fail on the cops part.

bigley.


Bullshit.
They always give field sobriety tests which of course are recorded to bolster the prosecution's case.
They told him to put his hands behind his back,he resisted.
End of story.


bullshit. & at no point did they say he was under arrest. that was completely against their own policy.

end of story.


So there's a cut off time for them to tell him he's under arrest?
Quote where thats a state law and be sure and link it.
 
Police followed all proper procedures. After 40 minutes of talking cordially, suspect failed a sobriety test and they told him they're arresting him, and proceeded to do so without being abusiv. It was only then that suspect resisted arrest, turned violent, stole the taser, tased one officer giving him a concussion, and tried to tase another one until his ass got shot. There is no way in hell any objective judge or jury will convict the officers. They were doing their job, in fact they didn't need to talk to the suspect that long, before they give him a sobriety test. Suspect even admitted he had been drinking.

Unless arresting Blacks or defending yourself from deadly force while trying to arrest Blacks is now somehow illegal.
 
Last edited:
So there's a cut off time for them to tell him he's under arrest?
Quote where thats a state law and be sure and link it.

the DA explicitly said that they did not & that per the protocol, they are supposta. it's in the video of the presser & you are welcome to listen to it & hear it for yerself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top