Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was vicious to the liberals in defending Trump all night on twitter. then he comes up with that dud dead speech. i can not defend a man who won't fight for himselfAnother thread on the indictment text. Awesome. I assume this is the updated version?
Are you watching the coverage of legal experts weigh in? Obviously not. Try not to be so retarded in public.BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
You made up some bullshit and thought you were being clever.
Too bad.
LOL Trump's only begun to bitch slap the filth Democrats on this. They will regret picking this fight.I was vicious to the liberals in defending Trump all night on twitter. then he comes up with that dud dead speech. i can not defend a man who won't fight for himself
Just admit it, your DA is a joke, his case is a joke and soon the idiot Dems will move on to their next 'get Trump' scheme.Good luck with that.
I find it ironic the Republicans are trying to weaponize the federal government.
So why not make that clear in the indictment?Yes, I know why. Because everyone on the planet, excepting Trumptards, know that other crime is the one Cohen went to prison for.
You live in a fantasy land, you have no case.Karma is very busy bitch slapping the shit out of Trump.
Not according to Alvin Bragg. Even he admits that the indictment paperwork is vague. He said by law he doesn’t need to explain all the charges, so he’s choosing to be vagueIt is clear. Crystal.
So you wanted him to come out screaming so that biased judge issues a gag-order on him.I was vicious to the liberals in defending Trump all night on twitter. then he comes up with that dud dead speech. i can not defend a man who won't fight for himself
The handling of the Stormy Daniels payoff is the violation of election law. That is not what he is charged with. He is charge with falsifying documents to cover up that violation. When documents were issued is irrelevant. It makes no different when documents were issued.Nope.
He has a signed statement from Stormy Daniels that she never received a penny from Trump. The $130K was something Michael Cohen supposedly did on his own without Trump's knowledge.
You can't retroactively charge Trump with something that #1 isn't illegal and #2 he had no knowledge of.
You're just taking the word of a convicted perjurer on all of this.
Every lawyer in the country said this BS indictment should be thrown out before it gets to trial. It will be lucky to last until the Dec 4th hearing.
they can gag one of us, but they can't gag us allSo you wanted him to come out screaming so that biased judge issues a gag-order on him.
A tape recording which is not likely to be admissible. But even if it is admissible, discussing the payment isn’t incriminatory. One is allowed to discuss paying for an NDA since it’s not a crime.Trump and Cohen are on tape discussing the payoff to Daniels.
As for lying, that's rich. All Trump does is lie, every time he opens his mouth.
Cohen lied at Trump's direction.
Dude....you're not listening.The handling of the Stormy Daniels payoff is the violation of election law. That is not what he is charged with. He is charge with falsifying documents to cover up that violation. When documents were issued is irrelevant. It makes no different when documents were issued.
The evidence of violation of election law will not be presented till the trial so we have to wait for that but I don't think that is going be the problem for the DA. I think it is going to be tuff proving that Trump sighed the documents with intent to cover up the election law violation.
New York election law statue of limitations is irrelevant because Trump is not being charged with violation the New York election law. He is being charges with a state statue that covers falsifying business documents. That means that the DA is going have to show that Trump was violating NY election law at time and that violation is the basis for the business document falsification.The NY law is a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations expired 3 years ago. To get around that the DA had to tie this to Federal election laws and upgrade to a felony. But the whole premise of the case is that Trump defrauded voters. But those federal election laws don't even require Trump to file the statements at issue until months AFTER the election hence no opportunity to defraud anyone.
This case is DOA.
Did you get your law degree mail order? Intent to defraud is where this case does a belly flop. Tissue?New York election law statue of limitations is irrelevant because Trump is not being charged with violation the New York election law. He is being charges with a state statue that covers falsifying business documents. That means that the DA is going have to show that Trump was violating NY election law at time and that violation is the basis for the business document falsification.
Wrong. It isn’t a violation of election law to execute an NDA. And paying for the NDA is legal and it hasn’t got a damn thing to do with the election law.The handling of the Stormy Daniels payoff is the violation of election law. That is not what he is charged with. He is charge with falsifying documents to cover up that violation. When documents were issued is irrelevant. It makes no different when documents were issued.
The evidence of violation of election law will not be presented till the trial so we have to wait for that but I don't think that is going be the problem for the DA. I think it is going to be tuff proving that Trump sighed the documents with intent to cover up the election law violation.
