Read Trump's Indictment Here

[mudwhistle]

 

[Flopper]

Dude....you're not listening.
He charged him with a crime that has a statute of limitations that has expired over 4 years ago.
And then there's the issue that this isn't even a violation in the first place because he didn't use campaign funds. He used his own money.
When they get to the particulars on this indictment they'll rip it a new asshole.

The loophole that Bragg wlll probably use is Any period following the commission of the offense (2017) during which the defendant was continuously outside this state is excluded from the calculation. Prosecutors are acutely aware of the time clock they work under. No prosecutor is going spend years on a case only to have it thrown out of court before the trial starts.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2023/04/04/Donald-J-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Rather than waiting for your propagandists to tell you what to parrot about it, read it for yourself.

I must warn Trump's fans that it is longer than a tweet, so it may be quite a challenge to your bumper sticker intellectual bandwidth to read all of it for yourself.

Nothing

Burger

 

[Clipper]

View attachment 773226

Daughter of Judge on Trump Case Worked on Biden-Harris Campaign

The daughter of Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing Trump's case, worked on the Biden-Harris campaign, according to a report.

www.breitbart.com

Does The Slug know that Daddy probably already cut him out of his will?

 

[mudwhistle]

The loophole that Bragg wlll probably use is Any period following the commission of the offense (2017) during which the defendant was continuously outside this state is excluded from the calculation. Prosecutors are acutely aware of the time clock they work under. No prosecutor is going spend years on a case only to have it thrown out of court before the trial starts.

Unless you figure you have the judge bought and paid for and the jury bought and paid for.
The fact remains....he's trying to make an assumption that he can get away with calling misdemeanors felonies just because they're, in his mind, an election offense. They're trying to make a case with a witness who has been convicted of perjury, of crimes that are misdemeanors at best and have passed the statute of limitations. If they were gonna bring this case, it should have been done in 2018 while he was president, and then it would have amounted to simply paying a fine.

But that doesn't serve their purposes. They're trying to tie up Trump in one trial after another for the next year and a half. What's especially damning to their case is none of this would have happened if Trump hadn't decided to run for office again. This is pure harassment.

 

[Clipper]

The know perjurer is your star witness. You gottem this time for sure!
Hahaaahahaahaaahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaaaaa

Please refer to Trump's raaaaaaant this evening for your future talking points. You can also reference Trump lackeys such as Mitt Romney, Graham, Jordan, his Fox News goon squad etc. in the future if your're not sure how to defend Trump's crime spree.

They have all the bases covered in order to keep in the good graces of their Dear Leader. Their fear of him is palpable.

 

[Flopper]

Unless you figure you have the judge bought and paid for and the jury bought and paid for.
The fact remains....he's trying to make an assumption that he can get away with calling misdemeanors felonies just because they're, in his mind, an election offense. They're trying to make a case with a witness who has been convicted of perjury, of crimes that are misdemeanors at best and have passed the statute of limitations. If they were gonna bring this case, it should have been done in 2018 while he was president, and then it would have amounted to simply paying a fine.

But that doesn't serve their purposes. They're trying to tie up Trump in one trial after another for the next year and a half. What's especially damning to their case is none of this would have happened if Trump hadn't decided to run for office again. This is pure harassment.

If he has the evidence to convince a jury that the intent of falsifying the documents was to conceal a crime, then it is a felony.

 

[OKTexas]

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2023/04/04/Donald-J-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Rather than waiting for your propagandists to tell you what to parrot about it, read it for yourself.

I must warn Trump's fans that it is longer than a tweet, so it may be quite a challenge to your bumper sticker intellectual bandwidth to read all of it for yourself.

The legal equivalent of throwing shit against a wall hoping something will stick. Any decent judge would trim the list by about 90%.

.

 

[The Duke]

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2023/04/04/Donald-J-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Rather than waiting for your propagandists to tell you what to parrot about it, read it for yourself.

I must warn Trump's fans that it is longer than a tweet, so it may be quite a challenge to your bumper sticker intellectual bandwidth to read all of it for yourself.

Already multiple threads on this, jackass. You ain't the first, either.

 

[scruffy]

To pay off Dennis Davidson's whore, Michael Cohen had to mortgage his house because Davidson, as usual, kept failing to provide the promised money for the payoff.

As such, Cohen lied to the bank about the purpose of the loan.

Dennis Davidson eventually paid Cohen back, with an added bonus, and then falsified his business records to conceal the purpose of the refund to Cohen.

Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Eight Counts, Including Criminal Tax Evasion And Campaign Finance Violations

www.justice.gov

Robert Khuzami, Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515, William F. Sweeney Jr., the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and James D. Robnett, the Special Agent-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (“IRS-CI”), announced today the guilty plea of MICHAEL COHEN to charges of tax evasion, making false statements to a federally-insured bank, and campaign finance violations. The plea was entered followed the filing of an eight-count criminal information, which alleged that COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the IRS, made false statements to a federally-insured financial institution in connection with a $500,000 home equity loan, and, in 2016, caused $280,000 in payments to be made to silence two women who otherwise planned to speak publicly about their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election. COHEN pled guilty today before U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III.

Thid is so much bullshit, if they wanted this to stick they'd have to indict every politician who ever lived.

 

[scruffy]

There was no NDA. It was to pay for a campaign finance violation.

Why is this not sinking into your heads?

BULLSHIT

You and Bragg are both full of shit.

 

[Mac1958]

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2023/04/04/Donald-J-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Rather than waiting for your propagandists to tell you what to parrot about it, read it for yourself.

I must warn Trump's fans that it is longer than a tweet, so it may be quite a challenge to your bumper sticker intellectual bandwidth to read all of it for yourself.

My (wild ass) guess is that this will not have been a good idea.

Being dead serious here, this celebrity-obsessed, short-attention-span country (which is FAR closer to the REAL problem than Trump himself) needs big, knockout swings to stay focused on a court case. This is not like that.

The only way I see most of the country locking on to this one is if the prosecutors lean on the "Catch & Kill" phrase. That's kind of exciting. Like a movie or video game title. Otherwise, this just doesn't look big and clear enough.

We'll see if Bragg screwed the pooch on this.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

He lied on behalf of his client Dennis Davidson.

And there is a paper trail to back up Davidson's crimes. And a recording.

Well I’m sure he won’t lie in the Trump case.

 

[mudwhistle]

If he has the evidence to convince a jury that the intent of falsifying the documents was to conceal a crime, then it is a felony.

Yet he can't even mention the crime.
Every lawyer in the country is saying the same thing, this is a god damned joke.

 

[Lesh]

The one Cohen went to prison for.

Why are your propagandists keeping you mushrooms in the dark?

Mushrooms thrive on the dark

 

[TNHarley]

I've noticed over time that some folks tend to start new threads with the same content when the existing thread isn't necessarily conforming to the direction they prefer it to go.

I imagine that they're hoping a new thread will take off and bury the existing thread and they can redirect dialogue in a manner more conforming to their own desires.

Good theory

 

[g5000]

The legal equivalent of throwing shit against a wall hoping something will stick. Any decent judge would trim the list by about 90%.

.

If you robbed 34 banks, would a judge trim 90 percent of those from the list?

 

[g5000]

My (wild ass) guess is that this will not have been a good idea.

Being dead serious here, this celebrity-obsessed, short-attention-span country (which is FAR closer to the REAL problem than Trump himself) needs big, knockout swings to stay focused on a court case. This is not like that.

The only way I see most of the country locking on to this one is if the prosecutors lean on the "Catch & Kill" phrase. That's kind of exciting. Like a movie or video game title. Otherwise, this just doesn't look big and clear enough.

We'll see if Bragg screwed the pooch on this.

This is just the opening salvo of Trump's legal problems.

 

[Mac1958]

This is just the opening salvo of Trump's legal problems.

Yeah, that the mitigating issue. If the big swings (seditious conspiracy, election tampering) come out in the next month or two, it would push this one back.

 

[g5000]

Yeah, that the mitigating issue. If the big swings (seditious conspiracy, election tampering) come out in the next month or two, it would push this one back.

If Trump isn't careful with his delay tactics, he could find himself on trial during the primaries.

That won't go well for him or the organization formerly known as the Republican Party.