DigitalDrifter
Diamond Member
I didn't realize the negro leagues were part of the MLB.
What's next, will they add girl's softball too?
What's next, will they add girl's softball too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasn't really as "racist" as a lying biographer made him out to be.Gibson now replacing the racist Ty Cobbs record is priceless.
Trans leagues!I didn't realize the negro leagues were part of the MLB.
What's next, will they add girl's softball too?
Not entirely true. That would mean that every player in the Negro Leagues were many times better than the then Major Leagues. A percentage could have made the Major Leagues from that era. So those stats could be padded. Of course, it does not matter anymore as the sport destroyed the sanctity of old men talking about who was great when they started with the strikes and free agency turned it into rent a player.Superior players stats posted.
what does it matter?.....their stats were no different than MLB with as many games played which was around 70 games give or take some,no outrageous stats.......and the league ended like 70 years ago....Fine...but where is the consistency in the keeping of the statistics? Who kept the stats for the Negro League games as opposed to the MLB games?
thats right...Cap Anson put an end to letting non whites play when they were talking about letting them play...he was the real racist.....He wasn't really as "racist" as a lying biographer made him out to be.
Records are recorded in different leagues to be kept separately. No records should ever be combined like this, its oil and water. That is what matters.what does it matter?.....their stats were no different than MLB with as many games played which was around 70 games give or take some,no outrageous stats.......and the league ended like 70 years ago....
they are just putting their stats in the mix like they do with the guys from the 1800's and the dead ball era stats.....those numbers shouldnt be mixed in either with modern baseball stats....I didn't realize the negro leagues were part of the MLB.
What's next, will they add girl's softball too?
they also include pre 1920 stats....those stats should not be in there either...Records are recorded in different leagues to be kept separately. No recordss should ever be combined like this, its oil and water. That is what matters.
MLB has accepted this farce, that is what matters.
No one questions how great a player Josh Gibson was, or the systemic racism that kept Black players from playing in the Majors 100 years ago. But this is an absurd rewriting of history. Why not make Sadaharu Oh the all-time home run leader with 868 home runs even though he only played in the Japanese leagues? That would be just as ridiculous.Gibson now replacing the racist Ty Cobbs record is priceless.
Exactly.No one questions how great a player Josh Gibson was, or the systemic racism that kept Black players from playing in the Majors 100 years ago. But this is an absurd rewriting of history. Why not make Sadaharu Oh the all-time home run leader with 868 home runs even though he only played in the Japanese leagues? That would be just as ridiculous.
He was just a mean sumbitch, a super competitive dude. He probably reflected the typical racist attitudes of 100 years ago, no more or less.He wasn't really as "racist" as a lying biographer made him out to be.
Actually, they were more honest back then then we are today.He was just a mean sumbitch, a super competitive dude. He probably reflected the typical racist attitudes of 100 years ago, no more or less.
At only 600 or so games, would they even realistically qualify for a place in the record books? You do have to have a minimum number of at bats, plate appearances, etc.so what, the Baseball Reference guide lets you know where and when they played and who they played for....and in spite of what skewy says when you look at the guide you can see how many games they played....and any baseball fan will say 3,000 games trumps 600 games....for the top number.....
no ...they are doing what they did with the old timers from the 1800's.....they shouldnt be there for the same reason....most dont have enough games played.....its all done for comparisons......cobb for the amount of games he played is still number one.....and you can see all this in the registers stats....At only 600 or so games, would they even realistically qualify for a place in the record books? You do have to have a minimum number of at bats, plate appearances, etc.
It's classic over compensation for the way things were centuries in the past.no ...they are doing what they did with the old timers from the 1800's.....they shouldnt be there for the same reason....most dont have enough games played.....its all done for comparisons......cobb for the amount of games he played is still number one.....and you can see all this in the registers stats....